Talk:Jonathan Howe
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Where in part-time job is Jonathan Howe?--Martin925 00:29, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
- He looks a bit like Tony Hawk. --Homestar tiger
QOTW
He might have also helped make the Quote of the Week template too, because the XML Sources say "love, jonathan" at the end. 
Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Halosche?!? Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- I just added it. Is that okay? Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. — Defender1031*Talk 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know why no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- In a year and a half, no one has replied, except for one person who said no one agrees with me and didn't even bother to explain why. Again, even if no one agrees, I'd like to know why, and it still warrants a discussion. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 21:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- I agree this should be added in. I've noticed that some references throughout the wiki use weasel words since a lot of the time we as outsiders can't be totally sure, so wording like "A signature in the XML seems to imply..." would be fine. -- Bleu Ninja
06:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- I agree this should be added in. I've noticed that some references throughout the wiki use weasel words since a lot of the time we as outsiders can't be totally sure, so wording like "A signature in the XML seems to imply..." would be fine. -- Bleu Ninja
- In a year and a half, no one has replied, except for one person who said no one agrees with me and didn't even bother to explain why. Again, even if no one agrees, I'd like to know why, and it still warrants a discussion.
- If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know why no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash.
- Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. — Defender1031*Talk 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year.
- It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone?
- I just added it. Is that okay?
