Template talk:delete
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(suggestion) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | :I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) | ::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| - | ::I agree with [[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]]. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. {{User:Supuhstar/sig}} | + | :::I agree with [[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]]. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. {{User:Supuhstar/sig}} |
| + | ::::If a troll marked a bunch of pages like that, it would be rather easy to tell. Plus, we might just make it inaccessable to anon IPs so that won't happen as much, so I stand for the proposal. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 17 March 2007
I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? —Gafaddict 
(Talk | Contribs.) 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --Stux 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus. -- Tom 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with Gafaddict. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. —Supuhstar*
- If a troll marked a bunch of pages like that, it would be rather easy to tell. Plus, we might just make it inaccessable to anon IPs so that won't happen as much, so I stand for the proposal. -Brightstar Shiner 16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Gafaddict. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. —Supuhstar*
- The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus. -- Tom 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
.gif){kind=small}
