Talk:Big Ol' Tree
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Redirected from Talk:Big Old Tree)
[edit] Merge?
I may be out of line here, but should we merge this with the The Stick article? This is a character variation (if you will) of the Stick, no? CoveredinSuudzu 05:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- The Thnikkaman is the same thing. A variation of Bubs. No merge. Sam the Man
- Well, the Thnikkaman is a recurring, talking character. The Big Old Tree only appeared once very briefly and may never appear again. If it does re-appear, then it certainly deserves its own page, but for now, it may just all well be merged with The Stick. Loafing 12:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with covered and loaf on this one. Merge. DeFender1031 12:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not quite significant enough for its own article. Merge. Heimstern Läufer 15:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- El merge-o. For reasons already mentioned. --DorianGray 17:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not quite significant enough for its own article. Merge. Heimstern Läufer 15:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with covered and loaf on this one. Merge. DeFender1031 12:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the Thnikkaman is a recurring, talking character. The Big Old Tree only appeared once very briefly and may never appear again. If it does re-appear, then it certainly deserves its own page, but for now, it may just all well be merged with The Stick. Loafing 12:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, since we're basically in agreement, what can we do next? CoveredinSuudzu 18:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with the merge, and it looks like there's clear consensus to take the info from this page and add it to The Stick. Do you feel like doing it? I think it could just go as a second paragraph at the beginning of the article. Trey56 18:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll do that. I'm not sure of the proper protocol for doing so, however. Do we need to get several people to support merging it with the article, or what? BTW, I think we should condense this article into a paragraph and insert it into the The Stick article and then delete the article completely. CoveredinSuudzu 21:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)