Talk:Jibblies 2 Teaser
From Homestar Runner Wiki
[edit] Channel ID
This toon's channel ID is JBZ. Any ideas why? Homestar-Winner (talk) 21:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Probably won't know until the toon is released. --DorianGray 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I know JBz is a candy made by Jelly Belly. Figured there might be a connection because of halloween. 74.173.153.110 01:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- The answer is jibblies (you don't have to believe me, but that was gonna be my guess). — It's dot com 22:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- I know JBz is a candy made by Jelly Belly. Figured there might be a connection because of halloween. 74.173.153.110 01:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Toon title
I know that Ween Toon 2007 comes from the toons menu, but I don't think that's it. I think that's just a placeholder for the real toon we get next week, and I think this toon should be moved back to something with the word Teaser in it, like Ween Toon 2007 Teaser or something. — It's dot com 22:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Second. Some people may think that it's the actual Halloween toon. Homestar-Winner (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Then we could stick "teaser" next to the link that is on the main page to avoid confusion. I don't know what they're going to do with the WT2007 entry on the toons menu once the main toon comes out, but I can say with some confidence that the toon will not be given this name. They never call a toon "Ween Toon 200X". As far as I see it, Ween Toon 2007 is the most official name we have for this thing. Anything else would just be... unofficial. I think of it as referring to the 2007 Halloween toon, not being a placeholder for it. —BazookaJoe 22:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think the entire entry is a teaser. It's not just the title; everything else is a placeholder, too, from the running time (6:66) to the description ("Who knows what this toon is about?!"). Depending on how all the dust settles next week and whether TBC keep this toon linked, I think it should eventually be called "(Real Name of Halloween Toon) Teaser". — It's dot com 23:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please, 6:66 is a reference to the devil, not the toon's running time. Nah, just kidding, i think it's a placeholder. — Defender1031*Talk 23:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think you're on to something there, DeFender. Even if you are just kidding. 6:66 just to be funny. I could see that. Or, maybe it is a placeholder and they orchestrated a toon with a running time of 6:66 (also, just to be funny). Either way. That would be nice. Over six minutes of any kind of toon would be great.
OptimisticFool 23:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that 6:66 is an intentional joke; I'm just saying they made a joke at all because they needed a placeholder. — It's dot com 23:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think you're on to something there, DeFender. Even if you are just kidding. 6:66 just to be funny. I could see that. Or, maybe it is a placeholder and they orchestrated a toon with a running time of 6:66 (also, just to be funny). Either way. That would be nice. Over six minutes of any kind of toon would be great.
- I can live with that if the dust settles that way, but as far as what we call it in the meantime... meh. This I guess? Why not? We can fix the confusion issue by putting "teaser" on T:whatsnew. —BazookaJoe 23:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please, 6:66 is a reference to the devil, not the toon's running time. Nah, just kidding, i think it's a placeholder. — Defender1031*Talk 23:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think the entire entry is a teaser. It's not just the title; everything else is a placeholder, too, from the running time (6:66) to the description ("Who knows what this toon is about?!"). Depending on how all the dust settles next week and whether TBC keep this toon linked, I think it should eventually be called "(Real Name of Halloween Toon) Teaser". — It's dot com 23:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Then we could stick "teaser" next to the link that is on the main page to avoid confusion. I don't know what they're going to do with the WT2007 entry on the toons menu once the main toon comes out, but I can say with some confidence that the toon will not be given this name. They never call a toon "Ween Toon 200X". As far as I see it, Ween Toon 2007 is the most official name we have for this thing. Anything else would just be... unofficial. I think of it as referring to the 2007 Halloween toon, not being a placeholder for it. —BazookaJoe 22:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
How about Halloween 2007 Teaser?--Darkangel 
02:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- We should leave it be until the actual toon comes out. If there's a naming conflict then we could this one to Ween Toon 2007 Teaser or something. suǝʇʇıʞ ƃuıɥɔund05:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Has anyone actually watched the toon till 6:66? It may have something at the end... or it could just be a satanic referance. Also, I agree with Darkangel. —Guard Duck talk 05:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- 6:66 isn't a real time, and the toon doesn't last that long. The frame count is too low. —Shwoo 07:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Has anyone actually watched the toon till 6:66? It may have something at the end... or it could just be a satanic referance. Also, I agree with Darkangel. —Guard Duck talk 05:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't put anything past TBC, so i watched for 8 min and you guys were right. It probably is a joke on their part, because that would be a 7:06 min toon (obviously) and that might actually be the reason there is no new sbemail..... this week anyway. Stinkoblade 23:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, if you had used a Flash seek bar, you'd see that the toon ends after Coach Z finishes his hoots and the crickets fade out. —BazookaJoe 00:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I think we should call it "Ween Toon 2007 Trailer", then put this article into the official page. Just a thought...~16_BIT_MARIO1
00:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
And, on an unrelated subject, I'm pretty sure that Homsar is Cartmen.
i think it should be called "holloween 2007 teaser trailer" — 207.200.116.197 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
- So it's a trailer for the teaser? Again, we should wait until the dust settles after the real toon comes out. Shall we take the {{rename}} template off the page until then? —BazookaJoe 00:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Whats wrong with calling it Ween Toon Soon, since thats what the main page calls it? Wylie 03:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's like how we don't call Marshie vs. Little Girl, "puppetween!" (which is on the main page). The toons menu has always been our source for official titles. —BazookaJoe 03:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I reckon Ween Toon 2007 should be called Halloween Toon 2007 Preview — 220.239.22.203 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
I think it should be calles Ween Teaser 2007-DIZZYZAP478
- Here's what I think: Leave it until the actual toon comes out, and call this "______ Teaser." Or, if this disappears after the actual toon is released, make this a section on the main toon's article. --Jnelson09 20:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
BAD COMMANDO NAME INDEED!!Seriously man!Try...Ween teaser 07 or Hallow-teaser or even T3H H4LL0W33N T33ZUH!!1!...well not that last one. -Rad
you guys!I saw the toon and it's about Jibblies and called Jibblies 2.Rinop 17:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
He or she is saying that this is "Jibblies Part 1". However I don't think it is, as the only reason the Ween Toon was called "Jibblies Part 2" is so TBC could set up a joke at the end of said toon. MJN SEIFER 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
