Talk:Papa Cardgage's Puddin' Patch
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Inclusion
Keep since Place and Carrot and Kazoo Hill already have articles as well. Bad Bad Guy 02:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect this is a frivolous article and it shouldnt have its own page if it is mentioned at a later date then it shall be brought back. I also think that those other two shouldn't have a page of their own. Redirect it to licensed --Wichesbrew82 02:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Doesn't bother me that we have this article. What does bother me has to do with the outline of the body... what happened to that guy's leg!? Yikes!
OptimisticFool 03:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
According to the inclusion guidelines, things closely associated to one character belong on the character page. This should be merged to Senor Cardgage, if it isn't there already.- Qermaq - (T/C)
03:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think this is all that closely associated with Senor C. (he never even appears there, after all, just is heard). I also rather disagree with the idea of merging a place into a character article. Support keeping. Heimstern Läufer
03:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, per arguments by Heimstern. Places and characters should be separate. And I don't think it should be redirected to the email, either. The article is short, but redirecting it there wouldn't do justice to the information in it. — It's dot com 03:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Heimi, I would ask you to consider that Papa Cardgage is Senor himself, that he is running a shady daycare, and his voice indicates his definite presence (and, possibly, the presence of another, or others) even if he does not visually appear. Fits his character. I can understand a reluctance to merge a place to a character page, but consider all other such places closely allied to a character (Strong Badia, the various Houses, The King Of Town's Grill, etc) all have multiple appearances and as such merit an article. - Qermaq - (T/C) 03:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think places require multiple appearances (whatever may appear on HRW:Inclusion guidelines, it's not really in keeping with our practices to require as much, as examples given by Bad Bad Guy show). Heimstern Läufer 03:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think places require multiple appearances (whatever may appear on HRW:Inclusion guidelines, it's not really in keeping with our practices to require as much, as examples given by Bad Bad Guy show). Heimstern Läufer
- I don't think this is all that closely associated with Senor C. (he never even appears there, after all, just is heard). I also rather disagree with the idea of merging a place into a character article. Support keeping. Heimstern Läufer
- Doesn't bother me that we have this article. What does bother me has to do with the outline of the body... what happened to that guy's leg!? Yikes!
- Redirect this is a frivolous article and it shouldnt have its own page if it is mentioned at a later date then it shall be brought back. I also think that those other two shouldn't have a page of their own. Redirect it to licensed --Wichesbrew82 02:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Actually, after re-reading the guidelines I cited, I see that "(a)ny item that is part of a character's outfit or is closely related to that character (Coach Z's Z, The Poopsmith's Shovel) does not merit a page and should be merged into that character's biography page, unless it has played major roles in toons or gags." This does play a major role, so I withdraw my previous suggestion and move to keep. - Qermaq - (T/C) 
03:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep—We have all kinds of pages on places that only appeared once in passing, such as Neuconsin, Istanbul, Cubeland, Moses MaloneLand, and Airplane. And in response to Qermaq's since-withdrawn argument, there's really no absolute definitive proof that the puddin' patch has anything to do with Senor Cardgage. It seems extremely likely, but he's not seen or directly mentioned in the email or on the walls of the building. We only hear a voice that we assume is his. Maybe Papa Cardgage is Senor's dad...--.
Johnny Jupiter! talk cont 03:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh come on. He is that sketchy, and he gives me nightmares. I acknowledge there is some argument that this is his father's place, and he is there as a child, but I gotta say, my first reaction was that it was Senor's place, and I think that was what TBC intended. - Qermaq - (T/C) 04:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think assuming it's his dad is more speculatory than assuming it's Senor. Incidentally, keep but decap "Puddin' Patch" to normal words. --DorianGray 04:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. I wasn't necessarily saying I thought it was his dad. It is pretty well clear that it's supposed to be Senor. I was just saying that the daycare isn't that closely related to Senor Cardgage to merit merging.--.
Johnny Jupiter! talk cont 05:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. I wasn't necessarily saying I thought it was his dad. It is pretty well clear that it's supposed to be Senor. I was just saying that the daycare isn't that closely related to Senor Cardgage to merit merging.--.
- I think assuming it's his dad is more speculatory than assuming it's Senor. Incidentally, keep but decap "Puddin' Patch" to normal words. --DorianGray 04:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely keep: most places get their own pages, and this one played an important role in the sbemail.
Trey56 09:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely keep: most places get their own pages, and this one played an important role in the sbemail.
[edit] Human Drawing
I think the drawing of the human Senor Cardgage face is the real Senor Cardgage. --Dewey Finn 22:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, rock 'n' roll man, but that is senseless speculation! --Shake 17:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Guff
Who the heck is Guff? Maybe we should make an article for him. The Pony man 18:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Nah, there's nowhere near enough info to make an article. It's a Sesame Street-esque character drawn on a cement wall. We don't even know if Guff is its name. It could just be a word on a shirt. --DorianGray 19:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Door
I just was watching licensed, and I noticed that either the door on the building seems to be in an odd rectangle shape. Probably just a mistake on TBC's part, but should we take note of it here or within the email itself? DevonM(talk·cont-ribs) 19:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Candyman Movie
Am I the only one who was reminded of the movie Candyman by this part?
