Talk:Video Game References
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Move) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Format) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
We already have Nintendo, Atari, and Intellivision pages. I just added Sega. Do we really need this? [[User:StarFox|StarFox]] 20:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC) | We already have Nintendo, Atari, and Intellivision pages. I just added Sega. Do we really need this? [[User:StarFox|StarFox]] 20:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::[[In Search of the Yello Dello|I think I has the solution!]] Just add a second "See Also" <small>[[Teen Girl Squad Issue 10|(or something like that)]]</small> section linking to the Nintendo, Sega, Sega Tapes, Atari, Intellivision, etc. pages. :D Eh? [[Eh! Steve|Steve?]] {{User:Neox/sig}} 02:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | ::[[In Search of the Yello Dello|I think I has the solution!]] Just add a second "See Also" <small>[[Teen Girl Squad Issue 10|(or something like that)]]</small> section linking to the Nintendo, Sega, Sega Tapes, Atari, Intellivision, etc. pages. :D Eh? [[Eh! Steve|Steve?]] {{User:Neox/sig}} 02:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Format == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The breakup of "Strong Bad Email" vs. "Other appearences" seems arbitrary. I think a breakup of "References to specific video games" and "References to video games in general" is probably a better format. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:43, 5 November 2009
Contents |
Other pages
Nintendo and Atari 2600 have most of the videogame references on the site. Should the pages be merged, maybe? —Shwoo 01:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I kinda like them separated, actually... Haven't worked out why yet, though. --DorianGray
- I like them separate, in large part because there are so many references on each page (well, especially Nintendo). Perhaps this could be a "portal page" to the larger reference pages (Nintendo, Atari, Floppy Disk Container, others?) with any miscellaneous references (e.g. Turbografx) listed on it. Trey56 06:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm with Shwoo. Otherwise, there's not really any point to this article! Neox ONION BUBS!
Move
I don't really like Video Games (Allusions) very much...
Suggest move to Other Video Games or something along those lines. Bluebry 06:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I entirely agree — how about Miscellaneous video game references? This would match the title of the category Category:Video game references. Trey56 18:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- That would work, though the title is a bit long. Maybe we need a disambiguation page titled Video Game References that points to the various pages? wbwolf (t | ed) 18:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why not merge this and the Nintendo, Atari, Intellivision, etc. pages together? Neox ONION BUBS! 23:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- That page might be a bit too big, especially considering the length of the Nintendo page... how's about Misc Video Game References?Disco Pwahty 1975
- That name sounds eerily similar to those of the previously suggested Miscellaneous video game references and Video Game References. Neox ONION BUBS! 02:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- That page might be a bit too big, especially considering the length of the Nintendo page... how's about Misc Video Game References?Disco Pwahty 1975
- Why not merge this and the Nintendo, Atari, Intellivision, etc. pages together? Neox ONION BUBS! 23:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphan
This page is an orphan. I'm too lazy to figure out how I should link it. Help please? free 21:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- There you go, little buddy. I linked to it in several "See Also" sections, since that seemed simplest. --DorianGray 22:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Separate Page
We already have Nintendo, Atari, and Intellivision pages. I just added Sega. Do we really need this? StarFox 20:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think I has the solution! Just add a second "See Also" (or something like that) section linking to the Nintendo, Sega, Sega Tapes, Atari, Intellivision, etc. pages. :D Eh? Steve? Neox ONION BUBS! 02:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Format
The breakup of "Strong Bad Email" vs. "Other appearences" seems arbitrary. I think a breakup of "References to specific video games" and "References to video games in general" is probably a better format. — Defender1031*Talk 05:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)