User talk:Will
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Kaption Kontest) |
(→Vandalizing Uncyclopedia) |
||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
::::::I put this discussion in the wrong place, honestly. Seriously, don't vandalize the Uncyclopedia (though I'm not totally sure what that would entail... serious information?) I just wanted to bring it up on this Wiki, and this place had a discussion about Uncyclopedia and Yelt. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | ::::::I put this discussion in the wrong place, honestly. Seriously, don't vandalize the Uncyclopedia (though I'm not totally sure what that would entail... serious information?) I just wanted to bring it up on this Wiki, and this place had a discussion about Uncyclopedia and Yelt. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I'm sorry, I really am. What I did was completely unnacceptable. I also realize that in no way did the Unencyclopedia do anthing to me, but rather a couple of users did. I just find it so arrogant. Calling sysops dicks, and that sort of thing made me really angry, and for a minute I didn't realize that I wasn't editing hrwiki; then it would be much more appropriate to be angry (not to vandalize, but rather to talk it out). I apologize to everyone on the Unencyclopedia, I really do. {{User: Seriously/sig}} 01:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | :::::::I'm sorry, I really am. What I did was completely unnacceptable. I also realize that in no way did the Unencyclopedia do anthing to me, but rather a couple of users did. I just find it so arrogant. Calling sysops dicks, and that sort of thing made me really angry, and for a minute I didn't realize that I wasn't editing hrwiki; then it would be much more appropriate to be angry (not to vandalize, but rather to talk it out). I apologize to everyone on the Unencyclopedia, I really do. {{User: Seriously/sig}} 01:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | dude, uncyclopedia is funny especially the hrwiki parody on there. dont forget that we are here because we love homestarrunner.com, a very funny place. — {{user:Yourmomgoestocollege/sig}} 12:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:55, 13 February 2006
I have made an Archive recently. Come and check it out if you want.
sig
can anyone create me a sig? i never undertand the directions. if you need my password i could give it to you, just make it cool. note: these are the people i'd like most to help me: thunderbird, abdiviklas, its dot com, gnome o' fury, and teh frossty one. Seriously 20:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm flattered that you'd ask me to help. First of all, though, I really, really would never give my password to anybody! (Besides which, no one would actually need it to make your sig. You'd have to go into "preferences" yourself, but that isn't too hard.) Secondly, I'm afraid I don't really have time. Somebody else might very well (maybe you could arange some kind of trade; you see stuff like that often, with users with drawing skills making pics for others in exchange for fanfics and so on), or better yet, take a shot at doing it yourself; I'll bet you'll find it easier than it looks. One other thing: some brand-new guidelines about what a sig should be have been posted at HRWiki:Signature. —AbdiViklas 20:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- If you link to the same page you are currently on, the link will become bold. See: User talk:Seriously. —FireBird|Talk 20:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- SWEET!!! so, how do i get it in action? Seriously 20:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Start by clicking "edit" on this section; find the code Venusy left and copy it. Go to User:Seriously/sig, delete what's there already, and paste it. Finally, go to your Preferences, put "{{User:Username/sig}}" in the "Your nickname (for signatures)" box, and check the checkbox for "Raw signatures." Then just use ~~~~ as usual, except now it will leave a trail of day-glo customization! —AbdiViklas 20:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- SWEET!!! so, how do i get it in action? Seriously 20:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thanks for my cool new sig, guys! Seriously (Talk) 22:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think I should probably explain the edit I made to your sig - firsly,
<font color="blah">
is deprecated in favour of<span style="color:blah">
. Next, one of the tags was<font font color="purple">
- the extrafont
was in the way. The<font>
tag arround the bullet wasn't closed, and there was no space after the bullet (which made it look lopsided). Finally, I combined the color and the font face into one tag for the "other stuff" link (you can do that, and it simplifies matters). Just ask me if you have any questions... --phlip TC 12:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
WikiTroll
Seriously, you're not really leaving Ciberdude alone as per Dot com's instructions if you address him in your edit summaries. Let other people deal with his WikiTroll edits. I assure you, we will. Heimstern Läufer 22:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- You were instructed not to reply to him, and to let the sysops handle it. You were given plenty of warnings, but instead you got into an edit war where you directly addressed Ciberdude444, which is exactly what you were instructed not to do. See you in a week. — It's dot com 00:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- i hate to rub it in, but isn't it kind of ironic that this was all done on wikitroll? 69.162.201.219 00:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's like raieeaaain on your wedding day. But rubbing it in isn't particularly helpful or necessary. —AbdiViklas 06:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- i hate to rub it in, but isn't it kind of ironic that this was all done on wikitroll? 69.162.201.219 00:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Dot com
Well I never said anything personal against him or anything like that. He has been a little less than pleasant toward me, just cos I happen to strongly disagree with him, so I'm not exactly going to be all cheery with him. Oh well. Yeltensic Save the guestbooks 03:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Even so, you should respect him. If he has just counterpointed your opinion and said his argument like he did, that gives you no reason to be like that. He also might just be mad at you because of your ridiculously profane comments that are barely censored. He can block you, and I might not be the one to say this, but I suggest you realize the trouble you could be in if you gave him another reason to be mad at you. So instead of talking to me about this, why don't you head on over to his talk page? Seriously (Talk) 20:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, but that's really not necessary. — It's dot com
I came to this talkpage cos my original post here was in response to your comments about all of this. Yeltensic Save the guestbooks 20:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Yay!!!!!!
I have special news!!!! One hundred pages now have my sig on them!!!! Seriously (Talk) 21:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Not anymore....--Trendy Totebag 02:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Yeltensic Save the guestbooks 21:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Dang man, how did you trick out your pagethingy like that.--Trendy Totebag 16:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC) You mean my sig? I didn't! Venusy helped me out! Seriously (Talk) 22:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Stop talking to troublemakers
Stop talking to troublemakers. It just puts more gas on the fire. Don't call them stupid. Don't tell them we're going to get them. If I remember correctly, it was your insistence in telling Ciberdude that he was a troll that started that whole feud. Let the sysops handle the troublemakers. — It's dot com 00:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. I understand. I am just fed up at the overflowing amount of yeltensics. Seriously (Talk) 00:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, Seriously, it is frustrating. But it doesn't do any good to threaten or insult vandals and trolls (this applies to any troll or vandal, not just Yeltensic). Sometimes, that's just what they're looking for, and at any rate, it won't stop them. Since we aren't sysops, the best thing we can do is revert and, if necessary (i.e., if the sysops don't already know), report on WikiTroll. Note that since Yeltensic isn't actually committing vandalism on the pages, we really should just leave this one up to the sysops. Heimstern Läufer
01:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, Seriously, it is frustrating. But it doesn't do any good to threaten or insult vandals and trolls (this applies to any troll or vandal, not just Yeltensic). Sometimes, that's just what they're looking for, and at any rate, it won't stop them. Since we aren't sysops, the best thing we can do is revert and, if necessary (i.e., if the sysops don't already know), report on WikiTroll. Note that since Yeltensic isn't actually committing vandalism on the pages, we really should just leave this one up to the sysops. Heimstern Läufer
Thanks for Welcoming Me
Thank you for welcoming me! What's a bit ironic, though, is that the person you warmly welcomed just now is the same person you listed as a WikiTroll and have insulted now and then. CMB stands for Christopher Michael Bensko. But thanks anyway. CMB 00:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I knew it. Dot com, see what this guy just wrote. This is ridiculous. Seriously (Talk) 00:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I find it rather interesting that I've always been pretty nice to you, Seriously, but you seem quite fond of insulting me. ThisDude 01:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
In the end, yelt, I'm just disappointed. You seemed like a pretty good user at first. Then, you became obsessed with the guestbooks and started putting offensive messages that were barely censored. Then, you went even further and made a page called save the guestbooks. Again. Again. And again. Finally you got blocked. I thought that would be the end, but no. Even when you go blocked, you just wouldn't give up. You've created more than 5 usernames, you know. That's bad. real bad. You are just ruining your reputation further. Soon, you will never have a chance to even salvage the broken pieces of your reputation, because you will be blocked indefinitely. Just give up, do your time, and come back on the wiki with a clean slate when you are unblocked. It's not too late. Seriously (Talk) 01:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Will, you buttkisser. And I mean that in a nice way. Once again, your opinions on and off the wiki have changed dramaticly. Or did they?--Trendy Totebag 02:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Sig II: Son of "Sig"
CAN SOMEBODY PLEASE SHOW ME HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENT FONT ON MY SIG!!!!!Seriously (Talk) 01:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Bands of today
I must agree with you that the bands of today, aren't so great. (no offense to anyone out there). It seems like it's meant to make you depressed. I don't want that. I DO like comedy music, though (it exists). Bluebry 02:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
True dat, Bluebry. You get cupcakes. The question is: do you like the bands I like, or do you just hate the bands I hate too? Seriously (Talk) 01:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- No, I just don't like the bands of today. They do seem like they want to get you depressed. They get me depressed, at least. Bluebry 02:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Re: Strong Bad Typemails
I agree with what you're saying. Can you offer any suggestions as to where I could post such a discussion?
--President Cold One 01:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Ah, thank you for posting this. I suggest the talk page on Strong Bad Email. That's the most relevant place to the actual emails, since you haven't just done one strong bad email with the typing, you've done about twenty. Well, good luck. Seriously (Talk) 12:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Flood
Seriously, please take a look away from your signature and notice that you are flooding Special:Recentchanges. To the right of the "Save page" button, there is a "Show preview" button. This shows what the page or section will look like when you save it, without actually saving it. Please use "Show preview" from now on. — Lapper (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry. I still dont' know how to make a freakin' font.....Seriously (Talk)
- like this (look at the text code for this post) the part where it says impact can be replaced with any font u desire — Your Mom Gosh!
12:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Psst... psssssst.....
{whispering} Hello there Seriously. See that little button next to "Save page"? It's called "Show preview". I think you might want to click on it and see what it does. Talk atcha later. — It's dot com 12:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, dot com, looks like Lapper beat you to the punch. — Has Matt? (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like we both hit the [ + ] button at the top, and so even if we posted at the same time, we wouldn't get a conflict. In any case, the message we were each trying to convey bears repeating. — It's dot com 12:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Parody Cool People
I love your parody list of cool people. Can you make my name Roy 27 instead of Roy 99? Just a suggestion. -Marth 99 17:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, I worked hard on it. And yes, i will. Seriously (Talk)
- Actually, you know, interestingly enough, there was actually a troll by the name of BlueJay who targeted Jay a while back. Check the WikiTroll archive for more details. --DorianGray
- Yeah, that's where I got it. I don't mean anything offensive by that, though. Maybe I should change it. Seriously (Talk) 19:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe. How about Kay? =3 --DorianGray
- Yeah, that's where I got it. I don't mean anything offensive by that, though. Maybe I should change it. Seriously (Talk) 19:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, you know, interestingly enough, there was actually a troll by the name of BlueJay who targeted Jay a while back. Check the WikiTroll archive for more details. --DorianGray
Thanks
Thanks for the message. Just a little naseau. (is that spelled right?) Bluebry 01:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
What did I say to you again? I forgot. and what does that french word mean? Seriously (Talk) 02:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Signature
Hi Seriously, I see you're working on your signature. I'm sure you're aware of our signature standards. It's not a big deal if it's a tiny little bit over the size limit, but your signature is currently over twice the allowable size. Please make sure that when you're finished, it's within the size limit. I've included your sig and the sig box below, as a handy reference while you work on it. I would suggest rewording, or <small> or <sub> tags, or both. Thanks. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 04:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Woah. I'll fix it. Sorry. Seriously (Talk) 04:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Is it good now? Seriously (Talk) 04:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Well sure, just see for yourself. Feel free to monkey around with it, just remember: Think outside the box, create inside it. (Man, that's a bad pun) ;) ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 04:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Ah, i didn't mind the pun. Seriously (Talk) 04:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Please choose something you can live with for a while and then keep it that way. What makes a signature special in real life is that it is recognizable because it, in general, stays the same over time. Here on the wiki, a signature should not be changed very often, simply because it's kind of like a logo that people use to identify you. (If a company changed its logo every day, people would have a hard time figuring out what they're buying.) Talk atcha later. — It's dot com 05:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
images
Authorless Books. Some images had bad resolution, so I reuploaded them to give them good resolution on that page. Everything from rampage. Bluebry 18:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Got it. Seriously (Talk) 18:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, grood. Bluebry 19:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism of User:The thing
Just don't do it, please. Thanks. —BazookaJoe 00:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Somehow, I had a feeling someone would hate me doing that. Sorry. Seriously (Talk) 00:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I don't hate you. I'm here to remind you that you're here for this, not this. —BazookaJoe 00:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Babel
I noticed you were trying to put the following babel tower on your page...is this what you were trying to do? hope this helps, Trey56 16:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I just want to put it on my userpage. Can you dot that for me?
- I just put it on your page...if you want to move it above the thermometer thing, just cut the section I added and put it above the "wikistress" line. If you want to add new babel blocks, just copy the section of code from HRWiki:Babel and paste it below the lowest {{babel...}} but above the |}. Hope this helps,
Trey56 16:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I will rejoice at your coolness! Seriously (Talk) 17:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for adding me to CPOTW!
Trey56 17:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, don't feel bad at my making fun of my name. See cool people list for everyone's nicknames. Seriously (Talk) 17:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Barnstars
I'd caution you against using barnstars, because several people don't support them and feel that they should be kept to the fanstuff wiki. So be careful we don't want everyone starting to do that and wind up with the guestbook situation and before you know it...no more barnstars. I R F
22:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Got it. I'ma go change the description. Too bad there won't be any real awards. Seriously (Talk) 23:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- another suggestion, if you intend on doing this for awhile, perhaps make a sub-page that has the pictures and captions from previous days. You could copy the code from here.
I R F
18:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Nah, I'm too lazy. Thanks, though. Seriously (Talk) 00:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Consider yourself awesome
Gee, Seriously, I think you're really cool. I noticed earlier on our talk page you said that you would like it if I were to help you with your sig. Now, I know I didn't help then (I really wish I could), but I'm flattered. Seriously, you are truly cool and awesome. Check out my userpage, and see yourself on my cool grapes people list! ♥ teeeffoh! 17:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I have checked out your userpage.... a lot of times. However, I only asked you to make me a sig because your sig is really cool. However, I did copy the cheatbot picture from your userpage and I think you are honestly one of the nicest people on the wiki. Thanks for putting me on your list. Seriously (Talk) 18:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- True dat. Double true. (The ultimate test: what is that from?) Seriously (Talk) 19:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- God, that was a funny movie. Check out Yourmomgoestocollege. He's pretty sweet. Seriously (Talk) 19:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
User:ohW .rD
Earlier we were the only ones on the wiki. that wuz weird. --TheThingé 20:21, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
only? That's suprising......Y'know, I'm disappointed at the sysops for leaving us alone at such a stupid time. But we did fight vandalism, and that's what matters. Seriously (Talk) 21:14, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Kaption Kontest
Your caption contest is cute. However, in light of this and the whole issue, would you mind moving it over here? (Or better yet, onto a Fanstuff page?) You could then link to it from your user page. And, my submission: {in Storybook voice} Strong Bad then won the IronicMan Competition by lifting everything else on the screen with one of his tiny hands. Giant Pac-Man Homestar wasn't impressed. —AbdiViklas 03:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- I can't stand the fact that even these have to go. But no matter how stupid and unnecessary this rule is, I'll do it. Goodbye awesome caption contests. Except one thing: Could people just do it on my Archive? That would be great....Seriously (Talk) 13:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- AbdiViklas is right: That whole page is fanstuff. You need to move it to the fanstuff wiki and mark the current page for deletion. You are more than welcome, however, to continue your caption contest there. — It's dot com 05:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I understand. However, I am not moving it to Fanstuff, because, well, I never really liked fanstuff. Whatev. I'll mark it for deletion. Seriously (Talk) 12:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Vandalizing Uncyclopedia
Seriously, I am very disappointed in you. Vandalizing Uncyclopedia just to get back at them for the HRWIKI page is completely unacceptable. I wish you had realized that it was only a few people who are not big Uncyclopedia contributors — not Uncyclopedia itself — that put anti-HRWiki material on that page. Vandalizing any wiki for any purpose is not what HRWikians do. HRWiki users should be considered model wikians who would never stoop down to the level of vandalizers for revenge. Your behavior, however, shattered my trust in your ability to positively represent the people of the Homestar Runner Wiki. —BazookaJoe 01:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not condoning Seriously's actions, but even for the Uncyclopedia, Yelt crossed the line. Not on the HRWIKI page, but on his own User page. He linked to several H*R Wiki pages specifically telling people to vandalize them. (Specifically, the user pages of five significant members, four of whom are sysops.) --Jay (Gobble) 01:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia should not be vandalized for Yelt's actions. —BazookaJoe 01:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it should. As I said, not condoning Seriously's actions. I'm just bringing this to attention. --Jay (Gobble) 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm... That does explain why some random people that seem not to be Yelt come here and do just that... --DorianGray
- People have been vandalizing the HRWiki since it's inception, and will continue to vandalize it long after Seriously's actions at uncyclopedia. But that's not important right now. The problem is that returning evil for evil just isn't the HRWiki way, period. ⇔Thunderbird⇔
- I put this discussion in the wrong place, honestly. Seriously, don't vandalize the Uncyclopedia (though I'm not totally sure what that would entail... serious information?) I just wanted to bring it up on this Wiki, and this place had a discussion about Uncyclopedia and Yelt. --Jay (Gobble) 01:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I really am. What I did was completely unnacceptable. I also realize that in no way did the Unencyclopedia do anthing to me, but rather a couple of users did. I just find it so arrogant. Calling sysops dicks, and that sort of thing made me really angry, and for a minute I didn't realize that I wasn't editing hrwiki; then it would be much more appropriate to be angry (not to vandalize, but rather to talk it out). I apologize to everyone on the Unencyclopedia, I really do. Seriously (Talk) 01:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I put this discussion in the wrong place, honestly. Seriously, don't vandalize the Uncyclopedia (though I'm not totally sure what that would entail... serious information?) I just wanted to bring it up on this Wiki, and this place had a discussion about Uncyclopedia and Yelt. --Jay (Gobble) 01:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- People have been vandalizing the HRWiki since it's inception, and will continue to vandalize it long after Seriously's actions at uncyclopedia. But that's not important right now. The problem is that returning evil for evil just isn't the HRWiki way, period. ⇔Thunderbird⇔
- Hmm... That does explain why some random people that seem not to be Yelt come here and do just that... --DorianGray
- I'm not saying it should. As I said, not condoning Seriously's actions. I'm just bringing this to attention. --Jay (Gobble) 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia should not be vandalized for Yelt's actions. —BazookaJoe 01:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
dude, uncyclopedia is funny especially the hrwiki parody on there. dont forget that we are here because we love homestarrunner.com, a very funny place. — Your Mom Gosh! 12:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)