Talk:Strong Bad Losing His Edge

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Discussion: keep)
(→Discussion)
Line 7: Line 7:
::::I said that to myself when I first saw this page. Then again, I don't really think anyone is really going to be looking for this, so i don't think a redirect is necessary. Basically, '''Dill beat''' it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
::::I said that to myself when I first saw this page. Then again, I don't really think anyone is really going to be looking for this, so i don't think a redirect is necessary. Basically, '''Dill beat''' it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
:::::I disagree. While these are blatant lies exposed, this is a totally separate gag. Strong Bad being obviously lame is noteworthy and deserves its own article. Being cool is such an integral part of how SB portraits himself. '''Keep''' but '''rename'''{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
:::::I disagree. While these are blatant lies exposed, this is a totally separate gag. Strong Bad being obviously lame is noteworthy and deserves its own article. Being cool is such an integral part of how SB portraits himself. '''Keep''' but '''rename'''{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 +
::::::Hmm...how about the name "Strong Bad Admits"  or something like that? I know it's not great, but it's the best I can think up.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 00:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:32, 5 August 2008

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Discussion

Is this necessary? BBG 03:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, yes, it could be. That is, if we rounded up more facts. I like the idea personally. --TheYellowDart—(t/c) 04:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I second that. Although, maybe the title could be changed to not generalize the article. Like, "Strong Bad Contradicting Himself". DevonM(talk·cont-ribs) 04:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
This is pretty much a rehash of Blatant Lies. I don't think this page is needed. Dr. Clash 22:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I said that to myself when I first saw this page. Then again, I don't really think anyone is really going to be looking for this, so i don't think a redirect is necessary. Basically, Dill beat it. — Defender1031*Talk 22:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I disagree. While these are blatant lies exposed, this is a totally separate gag. Strong Bad being obviously lame is noteworthy and deserves its own article. Being cool is such an integral part of how SB portraits himself. Keep but rename Loafing 22:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Hmm...how about the name "Strong Bad Admits" or something like that? I know it's not great, but it's the best I can think up.--NintenEthan 00:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Losing_His_Edge"
Personal tools