Talk:Crisps, A-Soy!
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (reply) |
Guard Duck (Talk | contribs) (how about someone actually answers?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Why don't you sign your posts?--[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 17:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | :Why don't you sign your posts?--[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 17:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Why don't you look at the page history and realize that this conversation is over two years old? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 18:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ::Why don't you look at the page history and realize that this conversation is over two years old? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 18:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::If anyone actually, you know, wants an ''answer'' to this question, this page exists because, according to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion guidelines]], "page content relating to a H*R-specific item or location needs only one appearance in Homestar Runner toons, as long as it played an important role in the plot." I suppose one could argue that Crisps, A-Soy! didn't exactly play all that important of a role, but hey, if we have [[C'mon! It's FOG!]] and [[Air Cardgage]], we might as well have this. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 18:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 18:31, 5 April 2009
why does this deserve an article?
- Why don't you sign your posts?--Jellote 17:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why don't you look at the page history and realize that this conversation is over two years old? — MichaelXX2
18:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- If anyone actually, you know, wants an answer to this question, this page exists because, according to the inclusion guidelines, "page content relating to a H*R-specific item or location needs only one appearance in Homestar Runner toons, as long as it played an important role in the plot." I suppose one could argue that Crisps, A-Soy! didn't exactly play all that important of a role, but hey, if we have C'mon! It's FOG! and Air Cardgage, we might as well have this. —Guard Duck talk 18:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why don't you look at the page history and realize that this conversation is over two years old? — MichaelXX2
