Talk:Bubs's Shady Business Practices
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (a little more just to complete the thought) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Questionable Medical Coverage) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ::I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Thanks for the little tidbit that's worth adding. You're right. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | :::Thanks for the little tidbit that's worth adding. You're right. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Questionable Medical Coverage == | ||
| + | |||
| + | What section would the questionable medical coverage from [[Donut unto others]] go under? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 2 May 2010
Rename?
I say move to "Bubs's Bad Business Practices" per Doomy Tales. — Defender1031*Talk 20:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, "Shady" has a much nicer ring. "Bad" can mean a lot of things (evil, bad quality, poorly run), and I think they chose it just for the Pulp Fiction reference. "Shady", on the other hand, conveys the right nuance. It's a word that's used in the canon with regularity, too. In Broken Compy Menu, Homestar asks, "What kinda shady Bubs business you running here anyways?" — It's dot com 21:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --Stux 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the little tidbit that's worth adding. You're right. — Defender1031*Talk 21:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --Stux 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Questionable Medical Coverage
What section would the questionable medical coverage from Donut unto others go under? — Defender1031*Talk 21:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
