Talk:Killing Dogs

From Homestar Runner Wiki

3 instances is not "many". This article shouldn't be here. Bub 04:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Three instances is the usual minimum for such an article. And it's a notable thing too. Loafing 04:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Bubs though... But since it has three examples and all, I suppose it's okay. If this article is going to stay, can someone at least change the name..."Hurting dogs" or something... It just doesn't sit right with me the way it is currently... kai lyn 04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind the article as it is, but you people want it, it will be fine to merge it as a new header in Dogs. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 04:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

That's a good idea. Loafing

That's a wicked good idea. (By the way, I meant to say "Bub" before... I'm tired, and going to bed riiiiight nooooowwww... *(yawn)* Nighty night all! Pleasant wiki-ing! (Can't wait for tomorrow's Sbemail!) kai lyn 04:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. It's an activity running gag that is likely to be referenced again. Being in a new header in Dogs would not be smart (to me) because it would lose it's "running gag" category. No merge. TheYellowDart—(t/c)

Li'l Brudder

Does Li'l Brudder deserve mention? 72.75.6.40 02:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I think so — at very least in a "See also" section. Good idea. Trey56 03:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Why? He's not dead, and nobody tried to kill him. I simply don't see any connection at all. Loafing 03:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I'm not saying there's enough connection to list it in the appearances section, but in the bold part of the lead paragraph it includes "hurting dogs", and I figured it wasn't unreasonable to think of Li'l Brudder as a "hurt dog". But I see what you're saying about him having nothing to do with "killing dogs". Trey56 03:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)