Talk:Fully Human Characters

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Minor humans

What about minor characters like the guitar player from for kids and the hot '60s looking girls and SBASAF personnel from space program? Do entries on this page have to have more prominent roles? Trey56 05:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

You could create a "minor characters" category. Retromaniac 22:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Biscuit Hands

If Biscuit Dough Hands Man has biscuits for hands, he wouldn't be CLEARLY a human, would he? Homestar-winner 11:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I agreee. He's human "except for...". This theory could be applied to a lot of characters, most notably, Strong Mad and the members of TGS.--.Johnny Jupiter! ^talk _cont 21:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I just saw he was on there, and i thought that just b/c he has a human head and torso doesn't trump the fact that his hands of biscuit dough and his short, small legs which make him not "Clearly Human". The Knights Who Say Ni 20:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Page title

Is there something better than "Clearly human characters" that we could consider? I realize it's subtly different from "Human characters", but it just seems not-quite-right to me. — It's dot com 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought about that when I made Human characters as a redirect. It kinda reminds me of how "Obviously Phony Aliases" was changed to "Aliases Used in Prank Calls". I think we should change it to "Human characters" or something similar. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Possibly "Human-like Characters"? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

"Humanoid characters?" --Jnelson09 22:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Humanoid Characters? C'mon. That sounds like their robots. In my opinion, it should be "Human-like Characters", like TSG3 said. Sam the Man 14:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Strong Bad could be considered a humanoid character... DEI DAT VM^┌_{datvm center}\^{super contra}_┘ 14:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep the title! HAJ 17:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

How about just we just drop the "Clearly" and have Human Characters? – The Chort 11:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree fully. DrPepper42 19:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I think human references or something of that nature would be good Homsarstrongbad150 22:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I know this discussion has been dead for almost a year now, but I'd like to bring it up again, just because the word "Clearly" jumps out at me. I think a move to Human Characters would work nicely. —Guard Duck ^talk 23:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Human Characters. Makes more sense, anyway. Besides, is Crack REALLY that clear. For all we know, his legs could be Da Huuuuuuudge-like.--Jellote wuz here 23:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

And for all we know, Strong Bad could have a pair of human hands underneath his boxing gloves. It doesn't really matter. It also looks like the majority of us wants "Human Characters," is that right? — MichaelXX2 18:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I totally agree,it should be just "Human Characters" Rondleman! Stuff I did.Talk. 01:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)