Talk:Air Cardgage
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Minor item?
With two incidental appearances, does this have enough for a page? At very least, this page needs to be cleaned up with an image. Personally, I'd rather see this redirected. wbwolf (t | ed) 03:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Heck no at all. I imagine seeing this on the items page. As I quote from every running gag talk page that has been deleted: "It needs to have three really good references and not two coincidental ones." Merge with items. — MichaelXX2
03:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Homestar Runner Wiki was made for everything Homestar Runner. Air Cardgage has been shown more than once on the site. So it should get it's own page shouldn't it?
- Look, it takes THREE GOOD REFERENCES TO MAKE A PAGE LIKE THIS, IN CASE YOU FAILED TO READ MY POST. IT IS NOT NEEDED. — MichaelXX2
19:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Let's not get carried away, Michael, there have certainly been exceptions to that rule. In this case, however, its appearances have been minor enough for it to only be allowed a slot on the items page. —Guard Duck talk 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Look, it takes THREE GOOD REFERENCES TO MAKE A PAGE LIKE THIS, IN CASE YOU FAILED TO READ MY POST. IT IS NOT NEEDED. — MichaelXX2
- Homestar Runner Wiki was made for everything Homestar Runner. Air Cardgage has been shown more than once on the site. So it should get it's own page shouldn't it?
Look at the junkyard page. It only has one reference and it is barely seen and yet it still has its own page. I even think it is just behind the fence. Kevo411
- First of all, MichaelXX2, WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING? Secondly, according to the Inclusion guidelines (which I want you to have a read over), a H*R-specific item or location "needs only one appearance in Homestar Runner toons, as long as it played an important role in the plot." The three references rule only applies to possible running gags. I'm leaning towards a keep and a major cleanup, simply because I didn't know that Senor Cardgage had his own brand of shoes and wouldn't have known this if this article hadn't been created. Also, we've kept articles on minor items which few appearnces before, (i.e. C'mon! It's FOG!). – The Chort 19:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I think this page is being judged on its current appearance and not on its merits. It would make a fine page. I also think people need to gain a better grasp of the "three appearances" rule. — Defender1031*Talk 19:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Completely agree with Defendemup Dan -128.103.10.200 20:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was reminded of The Blue Ones article after I posted the note. So, maybe something like this? wbwolf (t | ed) 20:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think it looks good. -128.103.10.200 20:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- You know, I've seen items far more insignificant than this one get pages, which have survived the "pending deletion" process multiple times. Hamburger Shampoo, for instance. However, this one seems legit. It's been seen twice, and had decent screen time in its debut. The "three appearances" rule only needs to apply to running gags. I say keep. -YK
00:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- You know, I've seen items far more insignificant than this one get pages, which have survived the "pending deletion" process multiple times. Hamburger Shampoo, for instance. However, this one seems legit. It's been seen twice, and had decent screen time in its debut. The "three appearances" rule only needs to apply to running gags. I say keep. -YK
- I think it looks good. -128.103.10.200 20:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was reminded of The Blue Ones article after I posted the note. So, maybe something like this? wbwolf (t | ed) 20:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Completely agree with Defendemup Dan -128.103.10.200 20:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I think this page is being judged on its current appearance and not on its merits. It would make a fine page. I also think people need to gain a better grasp of the "three appearances" rule. — Defender1031*Talk 19:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Reverts
Someone named wbwolf keeps saying my Air Cardgage page is untrue. But I don't understand what is untrue. Can you tell me what if there are any lies?
- Well, the price you're giving is untrue, but aside from that, you're giving minor details that are not relevant to the shoes at all and just clutter the article and make it hard to read. — Defender1031*Talk 17:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- In Diorama Strong Bad buys the shoes and a price tage comes up with $378.99 on it. So the price is correct.
- But in the easter egg, they're priced 249.99.99.99... hmm... Well that IS something that should be resolved. As for the rest of it, the details are still clunky and irrelevant. — Defender1031*Talk 18:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- How's this one?
- I think the wording that those who have worked on the page came up with is superior. I did add the price difference thing though. — Defender1031*Talk 18:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- How's this one?
- But in the easter egg, they're priced 249.99.99.99... hmm... Well that IS something that should be resolved. As for the rest of it, the details are still clunky and irrelevant. — Defender1031*Talk 18:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I do apologize for coming off too harshly. I had forgotten that the $378.99 price tag come up during the toon itself. However, the other problem I had with the reverts was removing all of the links and formatting that was done to improve the page, as well as the implication that Cardgage made the shoe (when it is clear he was just asked to endorse them). wbwolf (t | ed) 00:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- In Diorama Strong Bad buys the shoes and a price tage comes up with $378.99 on it. So the price is correct.
yes, wrestling
When Strong Bad and Mad are the Facepaint Connection in yes, wrestling, take a look at the two shapes at the top of his head. They look a LOT like the Air Cardgage logo. yes, wrestling was the sbemail directly before diorama, so is this just a coincidence? Or is it worth noting? Bleu Ninja 16:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- I would say coincidence, especially since they aren't the same colour (red vs. blue). wbwolf (t | ed) 16:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Holodomor was no secret IN WINNIPEG
Seventy seven long ago and half a world way, Tens of thousands of people were dying daily from a man-made famine created and executed by a foreign government in a country famed for its agricultural plenty. And readers of the Winnipeg Free Press knew interesting it.
The end up was Ukraine. and furthermore Winnipeg, Home to a large local of Ukrainian immigrants, Became a battleground between the people who were desperately trying to let the world know what Stalin was doing to their old country and the local communists who dismissed the reports of forced starvation as propaganda.
That battle was waged in public meetings and church halls and did not go unseen by this newspaper, Which in 1933 carried four or five reports on what has come to be known as the 1932 33 Holodomor genocide.
Stalin's campaign of forced collectivization began five years earlier and 1932 33 were the final nail in the coffin years that culminated eco-friendly tea's health benefits decade of genocidal Bolshevik policies towards Ukrainians.
Your sample of has come to an end.
We hope you really have enjoyed your trial! To please read on, We recommend our Read Now Pay Later regular membership. Simply add a type payment and pay only 27 per article.
For unrestricted access to the best local, nation's, And online news and much more, Try an All Access Digital ongoing:
we appreciate you supporting the journalism that our community needs!
Your demo has come to an end.
We hope may well enjoyed your trial! To keep reading, We recommend our Read Now Pay Later golf club. Simply add some form of payment and pay only 27 per article.
For any number of access to the best local, country wide, And global marketplace news and much more, Try an All Access Digital membership:
be grateful for supporting the journalism that our community needs!
Daily publication replica e Edition
News Break our leading iOS appIntroductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month properly tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month as for months 4 6, $10.99/month to make months 7 9, $13.99/month intended for months 10 12. ultimate standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month leads off after first year <a href=https://ukrainianwomenonlinedating.blogspot.com/2019/06/wonderful-dating-city-in-ukraine-kyiv.html>ukraina dating</a>.