Talk:Air Cardgage

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Contents 1 Minor item? 2 Reverts 3 yes, wrestling 4 asiame.com scam

Minor item?

With two incidental appearances, does this have enough for a page? At very least, this page needs to be cleaned up with an image. Personally, I'd rather see this redirected. wbwolf (t | ed) 03:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Heck no at all. I imagine seeing this on the items page. As I quote from every running gag talk page that has been deleted: "It needs to have three really good references and not two coincidental ones." Merge with items. — MichaelXX2 03:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Homestar Runner Wiki was made for everything Homestar Runner. Air Cardgage has been shown more than once on the site. So it should get it's own page shouldn't it?

Look, it takes THREE GOOD REFERENCES TO MAKE A PAGE LIKE THIS, IN CASE YOU FAILED TO READ MY POST. IT IS NOT NEEDED. — MichaelXX2 19:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Let's not get carried away, Michael, there have certainly been exceptions to that rule. In this case, however, its appearances have been minor enough for it to only be allowed a slot on the items page. —Guard Duck ^talk 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Look at the junkyard page. It only has one reference and it is barely seen and yet it still has its own page. I even think it is just behind the fence. Kevo411

First of all, MichaelXX2, WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING? Secondly, according to the Inclusion guidelines (which I want you to have a read over), a H*R-specific item or location "needs only one appearance in Homestar Runner toons, as long as it played an important role in the plot." The three references rule only applies to possible running gags. I'm leaning towards a keep and a major cleanup, simply because I didn't know that Senor Cardgage had his own brand of shoes and wouldn't have known this if this article hadn't been created. Also, we've kept articles on minor items which few appearnces before, (i.e. C'mon! It's FOG!). – The Chort 19:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree. I think this page is being judged on its current appearance and not on its merits. It would make a fine page. I also think people need to gain a better grasp of the "three appearances" rule. — Defender1031*Talk 19:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Completely agree with Defendemup Dan -128.103.10.200 20:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I was reminded of The Blue Ones article after I posted the note. So, maybe something like this? wbwolf (t | ed) 20:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it looks good. -128.103.10.200 20:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

You know, I've seen items far more insignificant than this one get pages, which have survived the "pending deletion" process multiple times. Hamburger Shampoo, for instance. However, this one seems legit. It's been seen twice, and had decent screen time in its debut. The "three appearances" rule only needs to apply to running gags. I say keep. -YK 00:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Reverts

Someone named wbwolf keeps saying my Air Cardgage page is untrue. But I don't understand what is untrue. Can you tell me what if there are any lies?

Well, the price you're giving is untrue, but aside from that, you're giving minor details that are not relevant to the shoes at all and just clutter the article and make it hard to read. — Defender1031*Talk 17:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

In Diorama Strong Bad buys the shoes and a price tage comes up with $378.99 on it. So the price is correct.

But in the easter egg, they're priced 249.99.99.99... hmm... Well that IS something that should be resolved. As for the rest of it, the details are still clunky and irrelevant. — Defender1031*Talk 18:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

How's this one?

I think the wording that those who have worked on the page came up with is superior. I did add the price difference thing though. — Defender1031*Talk 18:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I do apologize for coming off too harshly. I had forgotten that the $378.99 price tag come up during the toon itself. However, the other problem I had with the reverts was removing all of the links and formatting that was done to improve the page, as well as the implication that Cardgage made the shoe (when it is clear he was just asked to endorse them). wbwolf (t | ed) 00:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

yes, wrestling

When Strong Bad and Mad are the Facepaint Connection in yes, wrestling, take a look at the two shapes at the top of his head. They look a LOT like the Air Cardgage logo. yes, wrestling was the sbemail directly before diorama, so is this just a coincidence? Or is it worth noting? Bleu Ninja 16:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I would say coincidence, especially since they aren't the same colour (red vs. blue). wbwolf (t | ed) 16:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

asiame.com scam

The man called me again and instructed me that he can not make it Thursday and will call me subsequent week. We had a date set up for Thursday, and my son who's grown man sabotaged the entire date by calling him on the cellphone telling him to not name on this quantity. Plan on assembly at a public place for a set time. For others, it will take more time. Also, there is a catch right here: don’t be afraid to take step one if you end up confident. However, sometimes it is smart to wait for a number of hours or perhaps a day before sending something simply to ensure that you are positive of what you wish to say, particularly, if it is vitally personal. I insisted on no less than paying for the dinner domestically and for tickets to concerts, tourist points of interest here, and surprisingly even the waitress/waiter would say 'let the gentleman pay ma'am' (after i instructed him I'd pay, he still took his bank card out, and the waitress would take his on a regular basis). And enough to search out out what sorts of dates they wish to take her out on.

If you're on a courting app to search out somebody who's severe about meeting new individuals, this methodology will entice the fitting matches and ship the others packing. Then the dating site matches you day by day with about three to seven potential suitors based mostly in your objectives, values <a href=https://twitter.com/asiameofficial/>asiame.com</a> and different standards. I have been practising your visualization methods every day (fairly enjoyably I would say) and haven't any drawback with that half. Most of us have skilled courting a one that did not treat us well, however it is important to to not make a habit of falling for such individuals. People who ghost are folks you want nothing to do with anyways. Are you keen not to accept such remedy once more in the future? I'll also explain why the examples are so successful, too. Here's the question, why is it that I get so few responses from males by way of on-line dating? My finest guess is that the men you're approaching will not be the males you need to draw. Listed below are some ideas for ladies to navigate the online relationship scene effectively. Any ideas you could possibly share with me Terry?

He mentioned he's getting embarrassed before the waiters 'coz I wished to share the expenses, and strongly insisted on me to not take out my credit card the subsequent time. Have you ever tried asking him what it's going to take to alter that? All customers must be not less than 18 to join the network, and over four million people have taken the plunge into this dynamic courting pool. It's puzzling as well as frustrating to say the least. A rich man like women’s who's at all times dressed nicely. Interestingly, I read relationship recommendation everywhere that, if a man would not pay on a date, or agrees to share expenses with you, he's not price it blah blah. After our date, I thanked him for taking me out, and offered to pay my share of the bills, and he gently said it's okay. We offered to fix completely every little thing. We reside in different places, and we even had an informal talk about one of us shifting to his/my metropolis if things really bought up to now, based on the type of jobs we'd get. You can even add a considerate comment about what they mentioned.

I should add right here that a number of years again I went via a brutal and nasty divorce, and I've been very reticent about getting involved with anyone for a while. If I try this to a man, won't he feel the same manner I felt with the man who let me spend on a regular basis. Turned out, we each did not really feel we're right for each other after the date (we had different pursuits, he is type A, and I'm not and different such things and we had no chemistry intellectually or emotionally (we did not get physical, although he made an gentle advance, I didnt give any encouragement). Or are you in search of a man to make you're feeling worthwhile? Are you on the lookout for that "friendship that has caught hearth," as Ann Landers (I think it was she, although it may have been her sister, Dear Abby) used to say? It's meant for another person, who's out there, and who could or will not be profiled on an Internet relationship site. It's your entrance on this world of online relationship. By providing personalised recommendation, boosting confidence, and providing real-time communication ideas, RIZZ AI Chat empowers you to put your finest foot ahead within the courting world.