Editing Talk:Babies
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
Current revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:<s>Babies are very common. (sorry for the late reply, i didn't notice you had edit conflicted me) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)</s> | :<s>Babies are very common. (sorry for the late reply, i didn't notice you had edit conflicted me) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)</s> | ||
::I think you're misunderstanding the message of the Spoons page, DeFender. Just because an object is common in the real world does not mean it can't have an article. If it is used in situations beyond what would be considered normal in real life (things like "my baby got stole", "wave o' babies", or "babies having babies"), than it may be deserving of a page. Right now I'm neutral on this article, though. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 01:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | ::I think you're misunderstanding the message of the Spoons page, DeFender. Just because an object is common in the real world does not mean it can't have an article. If it is used in situations beyond what would be considered normal in real life (things like "my baby got stole", "wave o' babies", or "babies having babies"), than it may be deserving of a page. Right now I'm neutral on this article, though. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 01:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
- | :::I know that, and until you just said it, I didn't realize that they were used in any way other than normal, but now that i think about it... very very little girl... the baby from PQ, yeah, it is used in an unusual way... '''keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} | + | :::I know that, and until you just said it, I didn't realize that they were used in any way other than normal, but now that i think about it... very very little girl... the baby from PQ, yeah, it is used in an unusual way... '''keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:12, November 6, 2007 (UTC) |
::::'''Delete'''. Even if this is enough to warrent an article, then we should have "seniors", "cats", "dogs", etc. Babies just seems too general to warrent an article. {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 03:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | ::::'''Delete'''. Even if this is enough to warrent an article, then we should have "seniors", "cats", "dogs", etc. Babies just seems too general to warrent an article. {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 03:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::Don't be silly. Cats and dogs doesn't appear enough to warrant an article. [[Bears]] and [[prawns]] are. And for this article: Keep it for all the reasons above. Notablity by weirdity. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | :::::Don't be silly. Cats and dogs doesn't appear enough to warrant an article. [[Bears]] and [[prawns]] are. And for this article: Keep it for all the reasons above. Notablity by weirdity. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |