Talk:Cake

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Cake)
(Cake)
Line 13: Line 13:
:Actually, that's not a bad idea. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
:Actually, that's not a bad idea. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
::Agreed. [[User:Retromaniac|Retromaniac]] 22:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
::Agreed. [[User:Retromaniac|Retromaniac]] 22:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
This way we can also keep all the chocolate cake quotes :F I third this ideas. [[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:53, 14 February 2007

Delete

Not enough appearances nor important enough to be a running gag. Heimstern Läufer 22:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not done yet. Retromaniac 22:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I'm done. Is it better now? Retromaniac 22:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Heck, if Jerome can survive with one appearance off the site and one on the site,I say keep. Dr. Clash 22:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there's any relation between these appearances: One is an actual piece of chocolate cake, one is someone confusing something else for chocolate cake, and the last is Homestar deciding he's an ant. It therefore doesn't seem worthwhile to keep this article. Heimstern Läufer 22:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, per Heimstern. --DorianGray 22:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't really have a problem with it. We tend to have a lot of food and drink articles, and three mentions of chocolate cake may not be noteworthy, but it isn't irrational. — Lapper (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Cake

Why not expand into a general Cake article? Searching cake brings up quite a few responses. Dr. Clash 22:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually, that's not a bad idea. --DorianGray 22:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. Retromaniac 22:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

This way we can also keep all the chocolate cake quotes :F I third this ideas. Gerkuman 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools