| Current revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | {{tbd}} |
| | == Not needed == | | == Not needed == |
| | This is self-contained within SBTF and all the information that could possibly be put here is already there. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | This is self-contained within SBTF and all the information that could possibly be put here is already there. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
| Line 4: |
Line 5: |
| | ::No, it would not. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | ::No, it would not. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
| | ::: Now, now, Fender, let's not be hasty. Let's give it a try first. It may end up better than you expect. It's better than having on for each item, now isn't it. And, by the way, I know what your thinking, but no. These do deserve more than just a picture in the items gallery. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 01:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | ::: Now, now, Fender, let's not be hasty. Let's give it a try first. It may end up better than you expect. It's better than having on for each item, now isn't it. And, by the way, I know what your thinking, but no. These do deserve more than just a picture in the items gallery. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 01:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
| - | ::::But ''why'' they deserve more than just a pic is what I want to know. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 01:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::: Because, Free, they play a crucial role in SBTF. Each one is unique and has a a bit of info on it. But as it stands now, I can't be sure if it is enough. Let's just give it a chance before deciding. Me, I'm neutral at this point. Let's fill up the page and discuss from there. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 01:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | An image for each of the artifacts would be cool, and a better description. | | An image for each of the artifacts would be cool, and a better description. |
| - | :Replying to Jay: OK, didn't know if it had any markings on it is what I meant. Replying to topic: I, like Jellote, am neutral at this point as to whether this article stays or goes. {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 03:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Honestly, I wouldn't mind this page if it had pics. Or perhaps some page(s) for [[User:DorianGray/Items in SBCG4AP|all the items in Strong Bad's Cool Game For Attractive People]] (similar to [[Peasant's Quest Items]])? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 03:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::I'm with Dorian. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 00:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::That's a great idea, Dorian, and I really like your concept article so far. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 12:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Suggestion... ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Someone should put this article in the items category.h
| |
| - | :Done. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 07:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == No Images ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Is some one going to put images on this article? Without it the page is... lacking. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 06:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Images would be nice. I can't get any though. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Irredisregardless, I don't think this page should exist. But a bunch of important people do so I'm not sure my lowly opinion counts. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 06:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::So you're saying that you need someone to boot up the ol' SBCG4AP and get some images? I think I know a guy... - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 18:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::: I presume you mean yourself? I don't have the game. Or a Wii anymore. I gots me a Gamecube. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 13:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::: Also, CJI Fridays, I was wondering what you think about the [http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Category:Articles_for_Discussion Articles for Discussion]. You got any leads? I'm trying to get these cliffhangers resolved. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 13:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::: ye ye ye. The question is, what images are we looking for? The backpack icon? You can't really get a good screenshot of the icon without digging through the files probably. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 13:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::: Or we could delete the article considering it's covered in its respective game. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 13:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::::: But who doesn't want a page about a... Homsar.... ''binder''...
| |
| - | ::::::: Yeah, I guess we can delete. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 13:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::::::Wait, why don't we just make it redirect to the SBCG4AP episode page instead of deleting it? What if someone looks it up and needs help finishing the game, so they look up "homsartifacts" looking for the walkthrough or stuff? - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 15:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::::::Which page? The main one? Doesn't really mention them. The responses? They're all in different places. The walkthrough? Maybe. Yeah, probably the walkthrough. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 15:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Undelete ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | I don't think this page should have been deleted. (Well, not technically deleted, but still.) I think it has potential. See [[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/Pages#Homsartifacts|this draft]] I wrote. It tells the reader everything they need to know about these important items, all contained within a single page instead of spread throughout multiple response pages. These artifacts are important to the plot, unlike, say, [[Hamburger Shampoo]], or the dozens of other obscure item articles we have, and a lot of information is given about each item throughout the game. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 04:35, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| - | :You should transfer the draft here.-[[Special:Contributions/50.234.189.37|50.234.189.37]] 12:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::I would, but this page has been deleted once already, so I thought it would be better to ask for approval. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 04:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::I feel like editing this page would prompt more people to give their input, tho. Worst case it gets tbd’d again. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.76.16|107.77.76.16]] 23:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::I disagree with 2009 Defender up above. This definitely merits a page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::I also disagree with 2009 Defender up above. But I also disagree with 2015 me. This is worthy of a page, probably. ...yeah, definitely probably. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 00:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
