Talk:Guillotine
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Hmm...this article seems too minor. It has a very short appearance in one and only one toon, so why should we keep it? -Brightstar Shiner 20:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Brightstar, you of all people should know that we have wheel-barrows full of these articles. If we delete this one, we would have to delete them all (which I would have no problem with, but you know how it is). — Lapper (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
It's about as relevant as Stalker Spray, The Cheat's Soldering Iron, etc. I'm biased, seeing as I created it, but I say keep. Dr. Clash 21:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think if someone had no problem with deleting all these minor articles this wiki would not be a complete knowlege base. As a matter of fact, a wiki needs basically every article as possible. Definately no delete. TheYellowDart—(t/c) 21:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- If this was a democracy, I'd vote to delete the article.--Mycroft Holmes 22:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, I suggest we keep it. Items that appear only once are still often worth an article; it's the running gags that need more appearances to be worthwhile. Heimstern Läufer 22:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- This article is no more than a Real World Reference moved to an article. IMHO, it does NOT deserve a separate article after just a single appearance.--Mycroft Holmes 22:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep based on precedent as stated above. Mycroft, are you suggesting we wholesale clean house of any item or character article where the subject has one or two appearances? - Qermaq - (T/C) 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- In the best of all possible worlds, I'd say that each article refering to a very very minor item or character be re-examined. I understand that is not a realistic goal. Not every word and item needs a separate article. Sometimes a RWR is more than sufficient. --Mycroft Holmes 23:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep based on precedent as stated above. Mycroft, are you suggesting we wholesale clean house of any item or character article where the subject has one or two appearances? - Qermaq - (T/C) 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- This article is no more than a Real World Reference moved to an article. IMHO, it does NOT deserve a separate article after just a single appearance.--Mycroft Holmes 22:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, I suggest we keep it. Items that appear only once are still often worth an article; it's the running gags that need more appearances to be worthwhile. Heimstern Läufer 22:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- If this was a democracy, I'd vote to delete the article.--Mycroft Holmes 22:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, um...okay. We can keep it, I guess. Articles linked to from Items and such tend to be short and sweet like this one anyway. I was off the wiki for a while, came back, saw all these people arguing here and thought, "Did I provoke this?" But really, short articles are okay once in a while and I do know that, since about 65% of what I do around here is argue in stub talk pages about deletion. While we're here, is there anything else we can add to this page to make it a little less "lacking"? -Brightstar Shiner 23:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like on the longer side to me compared to a lot of other articles, including ones I've made myself. :-) TheYellowDart—(t/c) 23:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
More bias, but I'd say it's fine. It's got more than Stalker Spray, anyway, and everyone thinks that's fine. Dr. Clash 23:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)