Talk:Keyswordtar

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Redirected from Talk:Key-sword-tar)
Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Delete?

As there is no real key-sword-tar, does it merit its own page? Or should this be merged with Bubs' Keytar, possibly renaming that page Keytar? Qermaq 00:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind a bit of discussion on renaming several of the "[Character]'s [Item]" type pages to just the item (It's been bugging me for a while, I just haven't got around to saying anything about it), but I think this page has enough content to be a page of it's own. Thunderbird 00:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
My concern, though, arises from the similarity here as with Lazor Gun, which is currently proposed for deletion. This is only slightly more "real" than the Lazor Gun, in that it's an actual wood-and-paint version of one while the Lazor Gun is just imaginary. But it's still not real to the H*R universe. Qermaq 00:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Hmmm. Items have always been a very iffy category. There's not really any offical standard or anything in the way of Items yet, but the way I like to see it is this: If it's used 3 or more times, a page doesn't hurt. If it's part of a series of pages, such as Music Players or Computers, then it also doesn't hurt. In this particular case, I think this article should stay. Despite it being just a drawing of such; It fits in both in the category of Instruments and Weapons, which are both good sized series...es. (A good, yet still managable number of items). Therefore if it comes down to votes, I feel this item should stay as-is. As a side point, I strongly feel that Items needs cleanup and revision, but I'm not really up to trying to fix it at this time. But I'ma adding it to my to-do list right now. Thunderbird 00:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me if I sound stupid, but what exactly needs cleaning up in Items? It seems fine to me. Has Matt? (talk) 00:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This should be deleted. It was shown barely, and only once. Bluebry 00:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Edit Conflict: Keep. This was shown only once but not barely, it was an important joke in the toon, and I personally think it's cool! As mentioned many times before, there is nothing wrong with having small pages in the wiki. On a different note, Thunderbird, if the Items page is to be cleaned up, the Characters page would need a similar makeover (subpages perhaps?). However, I'm not clear as to what you think should be fixed in items. --Stux 00:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
I vote to keep it. It's a neat article, and everything Thunderbird said is true. --DorianGray
The reason why I think Lazor Gun should be deleted and not this is that if we create a page for the Lazor Gun, why not just create pages for all of the hands Strong Bad has on in that email? If Buckethand was deleted in the past, then in my humble opinion, Lazor Gun should go as well. Has Matt? (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
I didn't know there had been a page for Buckethand! Yeah it's definitely more important than Lazor Gun... is there at least a mention of it in the Items page or anywhere else besides the SB email itself? --Stux 00:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Your logic makes sense, Hass Matt?. Hadn't thought of it that way. I agree with what you posted above. Qermaq 00:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
In Items, the main problems I see is such things as Movies and TV Shows being there. Not only are they clearly not "Items", but Tv Shows already has a perfectly fine, and more complete page. Same with this, once again clearly not an item. Another problem is here. Half of the "Misc." section are already in this section. The Proud Anselmo??? What's he doing in the Items section? Those are the kind of problems with the page. Make no mistake, it's a pretty good page, but there are obivous problems with the whole setup. But I digress, I'm getting off topic. The question at hand is if this page should stay or not, and for the reasons I stated in my above comment I have to say it should. Thunderbird 01:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Ok so, The Items cleanup discussion has been copied here. Any further discussion on that topic should go on that page. I have also replied to your last comment in that page as well. As for this, like I said before, I don't think we need to put it up for deletion. --Stux 01:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unable to edit

Umm...this is sorta minor (and my first editing thingy) so this is probably something I missed and no big deal, but I wanted to add that the key-sword-tar could be a parody of Sora's Keyblade in the Kingdom Hearts series, but when I click edit it only lets me edit the references section. Is the article being locked for some reason? Lunais 00:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rename

Based on today's Weekly Fanstuff caption, should we rename this page to Keyswordtar and update all appearances of this word? OptimisticFool 20:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The one word version looks better anyways. --DorianGray 20:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Another yes vote. Ding! Homestar Coderhomestar-coder-sig.gif 20:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

When TBC give us the word, no sense delaying it. =] OptimisticFool 21:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools