Talk:stupid stuff

From Homestar Runner Wiki

[edit] DVD Question

What does the editor mean by "You can't make a round with the cheatcakes song anymore"? And what do they mean by "Now we know that the Cheat speak translates into They Go To Prison!"? It still says "Those People Go To Prison!" and I still don't know what "You can't make a round" means. -Homsar999 17:55, 14 Nov 2004

If you read the description of the normal easter egg for the online version of the toon, you could see what was meant by "a round." This is a really late response, but you know. --TheNintenGenius 20:32, 24 Jan 2005 (MST)

A round is when there's people singing the same stuff at slightly different times. -Miss Free Country USA

The disk case reads HyperBlade. That is my favorite game of all time. No game needs a sequel as much as that game. -Helios Rex

[edit] Scientist Uniform STUFF

Arguement where does strong bad get that scientist uniform? he grabs it off his keyboard, it seems, but i didnt see a uniform there before!-Homsar7^{(Hom · Sar)}

First of all, for instructions on how to STUFF facts, see HRWiki:STUFF. Second of all, that kind of thing happens all the time in cartoons, which makes it less notable. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bread and Butter

Strong Bad says that saying stupid stuff is Homestar's bread and butter, could this be a rferrence to Homestar's obbsesion with bread? I know bread and Butter is a commonly used expression, but he could have said other things that would get the point across just as well. Andrew911 03:20, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Another Glitch?

When The Cheat brings out the plate of Cheatcakes, the edge of the Cheatcakes went behind the edge of the Compy (it may sound ordinary, but watch it again, you'll see). Should we include this as a glitch? LongLiveCoachZ 02:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't see it, it looks like it's layered correctly to me... can you be more specific? If you've got the seek bar thing going, can you tell me a frame number? --phlip ^T_C 02:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Er, I sort of can't install anything on my computer. If you have an email address, I can email it to you...? Just an idea. LongLiveCoachZ 02:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] She blinded me with a popular song

• Homestar's "Science!" is said in the same way it interjected in the Thomas Dolby song, "She Blinded Me With Science".

The only thing connecting these two things is a single word, not enough for a reference in my opinion, and yes, i HAVE heard the song. — Defender1031*Talk 17:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

It's said very similar though. VERY similar. Even the emphasis and tone. Bluebry 17:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't think they're that similar, and even if they were, i wouldn't say that it's enough proof. — Defender1031*Talk 17:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, if I say "alrighty then" in my normal, suave, debonair tone that makes the ladies be all like "Oh Bluebry!", then it's not a reference to Jim Carrey. BUT if I say "alrighty then" in the same style as Jim Carrey, it is most definitely a reference to Jim Carrey. Bluebry 17:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

And as i said, i just don't hear enough of Jim Carrey in there to warrant attempting to save the dolphins' mascot... Or something... — Defender1031*Talk 17:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

He's pretty flexible, so he's in there, but hard to find. Just try to find that ring. And, um... <Ace Ventura reference>. Bluebry 17:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Haha, seriously though, i don't hear enough of a similarity, but why don't we go ahead and STUFF it? — Defender1031*Talk 18:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

STUFF sounds fine. Let's STUFF this stuff already! Bluebry 18:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll get right on it. — Defender1031*Talk 18:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I personally don't think STUFFing is necessary since I thought it was a lot more obvious than that. As Bluebry said, the tone inflection and everything are exactly the same. As in Jim Carrey's "already then" the "Science" part is one of the signatures of the song (and the song has many). The song was and still is distinctive enough to be recognizable. Anywho, do what you must. --Stux 18:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)reply

Well, I DON'T think it's obvious, and i'm not planning on backing down until and unless the votes are all for it, so i STUFFed it to get it over with. — Defender1031*Talk 18:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Stux: Yeah, considering Def and I just faded into Jim Carrey references instead of the real discussion (which pretty much went nowhere), STUFFing seemed to be the right thing to do. Bluebry 18:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

That's right... you know it's voting time when a conversation degenerates into a meaningless string of "Alrighty then"s. — Defender1031*Talk 18:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, I wouldn't call that set of already thens "meaningless". What may seem obvious to me isn't obvious to everyone (as I previously believed) which makes STUFFing appropriate, but that doesn't preclude me from being righ— I mean fair. ^_^ --Stux 18:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Closed STUFF