Talk:Baby Trogdor

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(what to do? it shouldn't be here but where should it be?)
Line 16: Line 16:
::::::::::::Oww, twelve colons. I'd say we '''put this information under a new section''' of the Trogdor page. Like, under one of those double equal sign things. {{User:Shadow Scythe of Strongbadia?!/sig}} 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
::::::::::::Oww, twelve colons. I'd say we '''put this information under a new section''' of the Trogdor page. Like, under one of those double equal sign things. {{User:Shadow Scythe of Strongbadia?!/sig}} 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Bringing the conversation back over here... It seems that this has been forgotten. there seems to be consensus that this doesn't merit its own page, but not what to actually do with it. There's only one way to settle this. '''Dance contest!''' er, I mean, '''More discussion!''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Bringing the conversation back over here... It seems that this has been forgotten. there seems to be consensus that this doesn't merit its own page, but not what to actually do with it. There's only one way to settle this. '''Dance contest!''' er, I mean, '''More discussion!''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
: I thought it was pretty clear that the information should be '''merged''' with the Trogdor article.  So... is anyone going to do it? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:33, 12 July 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Merge

Merge with Trogdor. Already useless. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man

I wouldn't call this information useless. The fact that this character was created just for the store is unique. The other problem is that I don't see where this could go in either Trogdor or Store Baby Clothes. What say the rest of ye? --Stux 19:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it should stay here. It definitly merits its own page. --Jangles5150 19:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the content on Store Baby Clothes is enough. From my point of view, Baby Trogdor was simply a stylized version of Regular Trogdor created solely for the baby clothes. Since he hasn't appeared in any toons or games, he's not really a character, just a single graphic. So, I think this page should be deleted and changed into a redirect to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. Trey56 20:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Good point, Trey. We could also turn it into a disambig, pointing to both Trogdor and the Store. Loafing 20:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Loafing has a good idea. Agree with the Bread-man!--Jangles5150 20:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I say it should just be merged with Trogdor.Enigma 18:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Bear in mind that Baby Trogdor could make an appearance on the site. You never know with TBC. – The Chort 18:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
If that is ever the case we can just revert the page back and add new info. --Stux 18:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Already mentioned on Trogdor. Redirect to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. – The Chort 16:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Loafing. Create a disambiguation page pointing to both Trogdor and Store Baby Clothes. If it turns out that they do put it on the site (which they may very well do), then I say we go with Stux's idea and revert and add new info. Isaac Smith (T · C)
I say merge with Trogdor. It is him, after all. — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 18:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Oww, twelve colons. I'd say we put this information under a new section of the Trogdor page. Like, under one of those double equal sign things. --Shadow Scythe 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Bringing the conversation back over here... It seems that this has been forgotten. there seems to be consensus that this doesn't merit its own page, but not what to actually do with it. There's only one way to settle this. Dance contest! er, I mean, More discussion! — Defender1031*Talk 03:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was pretty clear that the information should be merged with the Trogdor article. So... is anyone going to do it? wbwolf (t | ed) 05:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Baby_Trogdor"
Personal tools