Talk:Baby Trogdor

From Homestar Runner Wiki

This is the talk page of an article that has been merged with Store Baby Clothes. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

[edit] Merge

Merge with Trogdor. Already useless. Sam the Man

I wouldn't call this information useless. The fact that this character was created just for the store is unique. The other problem is that I don't see where this could go in either Trogdor or Store Baby Clothes. What say the rest of ye? --Stux 19:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it should stay here. It definitly merits its own page. --Jangles5150 19:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I think the content on Store Baby Clothes is enough. From my point of view, Baby Trogdor was simply a stylized version of Regular Trogdor created solely for the baby clothes. Since he hasn't appeared in any toons or games, he's not really a character, just a single graphic. So, I think this page should be deleted and changed into a redirect to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. Trey56 20:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Good point, Trey. We could also turn it into a disambig, pointing to both Trogdor and the Store. Loafing 20:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Loafing has a good idea. Agree with the Bread-man!--Jangles5150 20:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I say it should just be merged with Trogdor.Enigma 18:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Bear in mind that Baby Trogdor could make an appearance on the site. You never know with TBC. – The Chort 18:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

If that is ever the case we can just revert the page back and add new info. --Stux 18:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Already mentioned on Trogdor. Redirect to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. – The Chort 16:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Loafing. Create a disambiguation page pointing to both Trogdor and Store Baby Clothes. If it turns out that they do put it on the site (which they may very well do), then I say we go with Stux's idea and revert and add new info. Isaac Smith (T · C)

I say merge with Trogdor. It is him, after all. — ^Sam_{Fisher (Come in, Lambert.)} 18:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Oww, twelve colons. I'd say we put this information under a new section of the Trogdor page. Like, under one of those double equal sign things. --Shadow Scythe 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Bringing the conversation back over here... It seems that this has been forgotten. there seems to be consensus that this doesn't merit its own page, but not what to actually do with it. There's only one way to settle this. Dance contest! er, I mean, More discussion! — Defender1031*Talk 03:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was pretty clear that the information should be merged with the Trogdor article. So... is anyone going to do it? wbwolf (t | ed) 05:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

That was one option mentioned. Another was redirecting to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. Which do we do? — Defender1031*Talk 06:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I stick with my decision to redirect to Store Baby Clothes#tshirt_baby_trogdor. There is a lot more appropiate and relevant information about Baby Trogdor in that article than in Trogdor. The latter currently contains almost nothing about Baby Trogdor, save for a sole picture of said offspring at the bottom. If anyone ever wanted to find out more about Baby Trogdor, they should immediately be directed to his origins, in other words, the baby clothes in the Store. – The Chort 15:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Chorty. Redirect to store thingy. — Defender1031*Talk 17:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

{doesn't read the rest of page} First off, I don't think this is a character. It's just T-shirt art. So I think delete or merge to store whatever. Bluebry 17:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry, please DO read the rest of the page. There is consensus that this shouldn't be here, this section of the thread is dealing with what way to get rid of it, not whether to do so. — Defender1031*Talk 17:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)