Talk:Bubs's Shady Business Practices
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Guybrush20X6 (Talk | contribs) (→Questionable Medical Coverage) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Questionable Medical Coverage: nice) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
What section would the questionable medical coverage from [[Donut unto others]] go under? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | What section would the questionable medical coverage from [[Donut unto others]] go under? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | :How about "Insurance fraud"? [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 21:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | How about "Insurance fraud"? [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 21:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | + | ::I like it, but maybe just "Fraud" as it'll allow for a wider range of offenses. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:53, 2 May 2010
Rename?
I say move to "Bubs's Bad Business Practices" per Doomy Tales. — Defender1031*Talk 20:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, "Shady" has a much nicer ring. "Bad" can mean a lot of things (evil, bad quality, poorly run), and I think they chose it just for the Pulp Fiction reference. "Shady", on the other hand, conveys the right nuance. It's a word that's used in the canon with regularity, too. In Broken Compy Menu, Homestar asks, "What kinda shady Bubs business you running here anyways?" — It's dot com 21:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --Stux 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the little tidbit that's worth adding. You're right. — Defender1031*Talk 21:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, "Shady" sounds much better! (And shadier too). --Stux 21:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Questionable Medical Coverage
What section would the questionable medical coverage from Donut unto others go under? — Defender1031*Talk 21:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- How about "Insurance fraud"? Guybrush20X6 21:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I like it, but maybe just "Fraud" as it'll allow for a wider range of offenses. — Defender1031*Talk 21:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
