Talk:Questionable Products and Services

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 03:34, 12 May 2010 by DorianGray (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Questionable deletion

Previously, it had three entries. One of which was the Questionable Water from Halloween Potion-ma-jig. I deleted the questionable entry because the article is about questionable services, and I don't see how questionable water is a service. And now this running gag is has two entries. Unless the article gets a name change, it looks like it'll be Del Taco'd. --209.148.176.136 20:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Then the page needs a rename, not a delete. — Defender1031*Talk 20:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we could move this page to "Questionable things" or something less specific. I really think the word "questionable" is a noteworthy running gag. Guybrush20X6 20:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I won't question that! Either Questionable Things, or just "Questionable. They both fit. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 01:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I may be the only one who feels this way, but in my opinion, "Things" doesn't go well in the title of an article. Is there a word more specific than "Things" but less specific than "Services" that could be used? Shine Sprite (complain) 06:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Questionable Nouns?--Jellote wuz here 13:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Nouns is even worse than "things". It really just means "things" but could also be "person" or "place" too. — Defender1031*Talk 13:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

We've got articles like Best/Worst X Ever, East/West X, Pasty White X, Sweet Lady X, X, I mean X, I mean X, Ow! My X!, Not X .. why not Questionable X ? OptimisticFool 15:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

That's used only as a last resort when NOTHING else will fit... IMO "things" is better than X here. But come on people, we can do even better than that! — Defender1031*Talk 15:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Going out on a limb here... questionability? If that is a word, that may be the best title for such a page.--Jellote wuz here 01:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I like the name the way it is, as it shows exactly what the page is about. Simplifying the name (Questionable, etc.) makes it too ambiguous and sets it up for just being a list of times the word "questionable" was used. --DorianGray 03:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Questionable_Products_and_Services"
Personal tools