| Current revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | == Discussion ==
| + | {{tbd}} |
| | This is a character trait of Cheerleader and should be in her article. And it already is. This article does not add interesting information to that, in my opinion.'''delete'''{{User:Loafing/sig}} 20:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | | This is a character trait of Cheerleader and should be in her article. And it already is. This article does not add interesting information to that, in my opinion.'''delete'''{{User:Loafing/sig}} 20:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC) |
| | :To be fair, [[Strong Bad's Ladies]] is likewise an element of his character, but it has its own article. True, part of that is that he's a much more central character than Cheerleader. Still, I'm unconvinced at this point that we should delete this article and would lean toward keeping now. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | | :To be fair, [[Strong Bad's Ladies]] is likewise an element of his character, but it has its own article. True, part of that is that he's a much more central character than Cheerleader. Still, I'm unconvinced at this point that we should delete this article and would lean toward keeping now. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC) |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | I like this artcle.I agree with Heimstwen Laufer and vote '''keep.''' --[[User:Mariofan1000|Mariofan1000]] 10:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | | I like this artcle.I agree with Heimstwen Laufer and vote '''keep.''' --[[User:Mariofan1000|Mariofan1000]] 10:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
| | :To elaborate on my opinion above, as well as to explain why I disagree with Loafing's original rationale that the article adds nothing to what we already have in Cheerleader's bio: The detailed list of appearances is quite informative, in my opinion, and that would definitely be lost if this were deleted or merged. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | | :To elaborate on my opinion above, as well as to explain why I disagree with Loafing's original rationale that the article adds nothing to what we already have in Cheerleader's bio: The detailed list of appearances is quite informative, in my opinion, and that would definitely be lost if this were deleted or merged. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
| - | ::Yeah, the high amount of detail has me leaning very strongly towards '''keep'''. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 21:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::''{Edit conflict}'' This is a component of a very distinctive personality trait for Cheerleader, one that isn't shared by the rest of the girls, and one that many of the comics end up revolving around. I say '''keep'''. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 21:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::I say '''merge''' with [[Cheerleader]]. Look {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=630560#Cheerleader.27s_Boys how much better}} this looks on Cheerleader's own little page. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::Actually, this article makes perfect sense to have as a separate one. There is a lot of information here and is constantly popping up in TGS toons. Broadness? Eh, it is honestly about as broad as Strong Bad's Ladies. We should '''keep''' this as a separate article. Merging it Cheerleader would just be too much. Should we merge Strong Bad's Ladies as well then? --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 22:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::I didn't think it looked ''that'' much better on Cheerleader's page, since it kinda came out of right field. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::::I agree. Michael, your post is premised on "how much better it looks" when really, it looks worse in my opinion. This article is distinctive enough to '''keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::::I tried [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=630575 adding] the intro and picture, but it still doesn't look better than it does on its own. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | This article's fairly interesting (how else are you going to tell how often Cheerleader mentions boys, and what context?), and makes a nice parallel to [[Strong Bad's Ladies]] to boot. I'd like to see it stick around. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 10:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :At this point it seems clear that the consensus is to keep. Removing tag and closing discussion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == A Crush on Every Boy ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | May I ask the author, MHarrington, why he added that to the "Appearances" list of Cheerleader clearly did not say it? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 21:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Not trying to speak for MHarrington here, but is it even remotely possible that there was just some temporary confusion over the scope of the article? I imagine the internal monologue upon seeing the revert: "Oh, right. Just Cheerleader, not the whole Teen Girl Squad." Given that it was just one edit (not a series of reverts and re-reverts), and that you should be assuming good faith, I don't think this rises to the level of needing a thread here on the talk page. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
