Talk:Drive-Thru Whale
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (Reverted edits by Sam the Man (Talk); changed back to last version by It's dot com) |
(→Delete?: added my view, asked for reasoning behind deletion) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::::::::::::There are tons of items on [[Items]] that've only been seen once, anyway. Heck, [[Doreauxgard]]'s only been seen once, and look how we treat him. Definitely '''KEEP'''. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 21:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ::::::::::::::There are tons of items on [[Items]] that've only been seen once, anyway. Heck, [[Doreauxgard]]'s only been seen once, and look how we treat him. Definitely '''KEEP'''. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 21:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::::'''Keep''', for above reasons. Additionally, I wouldn't be surprised if this fellow shows up again in another toon, if only as a cameo. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | :::::::::::::::'''Keep''', for above reasons. Additionally, I wouldn't be surprised if this fellow shows up again in another toon, if only as a cameo. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::::::::::I also say keep it. It's an important enough element of the toon to merit its own page. A rewrite might not be a bad idea though. Has anyone posted a clear, specific reason why it's even been nominated for deletion??? ([[User:Some kind of scientist|Some kind of scientist]] 21:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 21:28, 19 March 2007
Delete?
Please don't delete this! I spent a long time on this. I always create stuff and it always gets deleted. I'll do anything if you don't delete this. It is one of the main reasons in a toon. It fits all the things a page needs to have. It even has it's picture. If it was part of the comment, I can change it.
- I agree. I don't know why the delete template was put up without comment, anyway. It's a major part of a toon, and I see no reason to delete it.
Dr. Clash 19:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I see no reason to remove the delete tags without a full discussion. — It's dot com 19:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think it fits all the things it needs to have. Even Dr.Clash Agrees with me. Why would you delete. Even ask Dr.CDlash or anyone else (maybe not Phlip ) and they will agree that it should not be deleted.
Sam the Man
- I know there's no reason to remove the tags wothout discussion, but is there a reason to put them there without discussion, either.
Dr. Clash 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- 1) Stop begging not to have your page deleted. That's very, very annoying. Nonetheless... 2) I think this is a perfectly legit article. It's an item that plays a major part in Drive-Thru. So, DON'T DELETE --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe don't delete it. I haven't decided yet. But at the very least, it needs a serious rewrite. --DorianGray 20:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Find a place to merge it to until it gets another appearance. --Crazyswordsman 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Originally I was going to add a mention to The Field, but there doesn't seem to be any room for that... --DorianGray 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Look I'm not whining anymore but all the people agree. You should consider it, It's dot com.
Sam the Man
- You aren't whining?! "Please don't delete this! I spent a long time on this. I'll do anything if you don't delete this.". That certainly sounds like whining. --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is it okay if delete to be deleted tag?
Sam the Man
- Nope. Let an administrator do it. — It's dot com 21:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I say delete it. I mean, I'll wait to see if it comes up again, but I don't think that we really need this page.--
DongleGoblin 21:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's significant enough for article in my mind since it's a central part of the short. I don't think we need to hold specific items like this to the same standard as generic items (i.e., pizza, ducks etc.) or running gags in terms of needing multiple appearances. Heimstern Läufer
21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- There are tons of items on Items that've only been seen once, anyway. Heck, Doreauxgard's only been seen once, and look how we treat him. Definitely KEEP.
Dr. Clash 21:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, for above reasons. Additionally, I wouldn't be surprised if this fellow shows up again in another toon, if only as a cameo.
Trey56 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I also say keep it. It's an important enough element of the toon to merit its own page. A rewrite might not be a bad idea though. Has anyone posted a clear, specific reason why it's even been nominated for deletion??? (Some kind of scientist 21:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC))
- Keep, for above reasons. Additionally, I wouldn't be surprised if this fellow shows up again in another toon, if only as a cameo.
- There are tons of items on Items that've only been seen once, anyway. Heck, Doreauxgard's only been seen once, and look how we treat him. Definitely KEEP.
Dr. Clash 21:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's significant enough for article in my mind since it's a central part of the short. I don't think we need to hold specific items like this to the same standard as generic items (i.e., pizza, ducks etc.) or running gags in terms of needing multiple appearances. Heimstern Läufer
- Is it okay if delete to be deleted tag?
- You aren't whining?! "Please don't delete this! I spent a long time on this. I'll do anything if you don't delete this.". That certainly sounds like whining. --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Look I'm not whining anymore but all the people agree. You should consider it, It's dot com.
- Originally I was going to add a mention to The Field, but there doesn't seem to be any room for that... --DorianGray 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Find a place to merge it to until it gets another appearance. --Crazyswordsman 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe don't delete it. I haven't decided yet. But at the very least, it needs a serious rewrite. --DorianGray 20:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- 1) Stop begging not to have your page deleted. That's very, very annoying. Nonetheless... 2) I think this is a perfectly legit article. It's an item that plays a major part in Drive-Thru. So, DON'T DELETE --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know there's no reason to remove the tags wothout discussion, but is there a reason to put them there without discussion, either.
Dr. Clash 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think it fits all the things it needs to have. Even Dr.Clash Agrees with me. Why would you delete. Even ask Dr.CDlash or anyone else (maybe not Phlip ) and they will agree that it should not be deleted.
- I see no reason to remove the delete tags without a full discussion. — It's dot com 19:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)