Talk:Drive-Thru Whale

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 22:32, 19 March 2007

Delete?

Please don't delete this! I spent a long time on this. I always create stuff and it always gets deleted. I'll do anything if you don't delete this. It is one of the main reasons in a toon. It fits all the things a page needs to have. It even has it's picture. If it was part of the comment, I can change it.

I agree. I don't know why the delete template was put up without comment, anyway. It's a major part of a toon, and I see no reason to delete it. Dr. Clash 19:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I see no reason to remove the delete tags without a full discussion. — It's dot com 19:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it fits all the things it needs to have. Even Dr.Clash Agrees with me. Why would you delete. Even ask Dr.CDlash or anyone else (maybe not Phlip ) and they will agree that it should not be deleted. Sam the Man

I know there's no reason to remove the tags wothout discussion, but is there a reason to put them there without discussion, either. Dr. Clash 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

1) Stop begging not to have your page deleted. That's very, very annoying. Nonetheless... 2) I think this is a perfectly legit article. It's an item that plays a major part in Drive-Thru. So, DON'T DELETE --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 19:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe don't delete it. I haven't decided yet. But at the very least, it needs a serious rewrite. --DorianGray 20:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Find a place to merge it to until it gets another appearance. --Crazyswordsman 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Originally I was going to add a mention to The Field, but there doesn't seem to be any room for that... --DorianGray 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Look I'm not whining anymore but all the people agree. You should consider it, It's dot com. Sam the Man

You aren't whining?! "Please don't delete this! I spent a long time on this. I'll do anything if you don't delete this.". That certainly sounds like whining. --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Is it okay if delete to be deleted tag? Sam the Man

Nope. Let an administrator do it. — It's dot com 21:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I say delete it. I mean, I'll wait to see if it comes up again, but I don't think that we really need this page.-- DongleGoblin 21:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep. It's significant enough for article in my mind since it's a central part of the short. I don't think we need to hold specific items like this to the same standard as generic items (i.e., pizza, ducks etc.) or running gags in terms of needing multiple appearances. Heimstern Läufer 21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

There are tons of items on Items that've only been seen once, anyway. Heck, Doreauxgard's only been seen once, and look how we treat him. Definitely KEEP. Dr. Clash 21:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep, for above reasons. Additionally, I wouldn't be surprised if this fellow shows up again in another toon, if only as a cameo. Trey56 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I also say keep it. It's an important enough element of the toon to merit its own page. A rewrite might not be a bad idea though. Has anyone posted a clear, specific reason why it's even been nominated for deletion??? (Some kind of scientist 21:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC))

Say that to Phlip. He was the one who nominated it for deletion. Sam the Man

KEEP. I don't think I need to restate what has already been said. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Character?

Should the drive-thru whale be considered a character? Specifically, do we think that the source of the voice is (a) the whale itself, (b) someone inside the whale, or (c) someone somewhere else whose voice comes through the loudspeaker inside the whale. Relevant to this discussion are the following pieces of data:

1. The whale speaks as if it is merely a loudspeaker.
2. In one scene, the camera looks out from the inside of the whale's mouth.
3. The whale eats the lobster.
4. The whale launches itself into Outer Space.

#1 seems to suggest conclusion (c), #2 and #4 seem to suggest conclusion (b), and #3 seems to suggest conclusion (a). I realize that any result we come up with is going to be speculation, but I think it's a necessary thing to discuss so that we know whether to classify it as a character, an unseen character, or an item. Trey56 22:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is tough, as it doesn't fit neatly into one category. I'd say "Character" is the best fit. It seems self-aware enough to interact with other characters, and clearly has its own wants and needs in life--specifically to cause dismemberment and eat a space lobster.(Some kind of scientist 22:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC))