Talk:The Cheat Gnawing

From Homestar Runner Wiki

[edit] Keep or What?

This should be merged with The Cheat. Sam the Man 21:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Wow, how fast does information spread around here? :) I wrote this like, tow seconds ago! user:haldo

I patrol recent changes. Anyway, I can see that this was made. This is the same thing as The Cheat Smoking, which got merged. Sam the Man 21:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The Cheat Smoking still exists as part of a larger Smoking article, not as part of The Cheat's bio. So it's not exactly a correct comparison. Heimstern Läufer 21:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Er, what do you mean? Gnawing and smoking are two different things! Wait, WHAT? Sam, my man, You WORK HERE?? I...I thought only Joey Day did that! user:haldo BTW, You're still awesome.

Yeah, in a way. I work for Recent Changes. Sam the Man 21:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Haldo: No, anybody can (and is encouraged to!) patrol Recent Changes to make sure that no poor edits or vandalism are added to any articles. Hope that helps! Trey56 21:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey there, people, look up "Gnaw." Since ther are enough apperences, an article named "Gnawing" could be considered an inside joke. user:haldo

Hmmm, currently, there are three appearances, and the first one listed doesn't actually fit it with the other two. Just gnawing on something certainly isn't notable enough, while "gnaw-sculpting" is. However, there seem to be only two occurances of this, which isn't enough according to our guidelines. Loafing 22:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and don't forget cheatday. user:haldo PS, I already added it.

And who could forget, strong bad would rather gnaw his leg off Than inverveiw Homsar. or when those fans had a Squirrel gnaw the cheat into a pumkin. or that it only takes 3 occurences to make a running gag. C'mon! I could SO make a legit page titled "gnawing"!!

Delete. This sort of falls under the category of Spoons. I also agree with Heinstern's comment above. Also, Haldo, we rarely decide if an article is necessary or not based on number of appearances. ^{The Goblin!!} 04:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it falls under HRWiki:Spoons as it currently stands. If it was just Gnawing, perhaps, but as it focuses specifically on The Cheat, I think it's somewhat more notable. --DorianGray 22:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

On the other hand, unusual waves would probally be a spoon. user:haldo (wait, what the crap?? am I moking my own article??)

Personally, I think we should keep this article. There are three referances to it, after all, and it takes three to make an inside joke. —Guard Duck ^talk 04:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, we do not decide if an article it able to be kept based on the number of appearences. We do it by relevance. There are a lot of objects that show up once, but are very important, and get an article. ^{The Goblin!!} 04:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

This is a good article. I don't see any reasons to delete it. It fit in the Inclusion guidelines quite well. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 06:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep. OptimisticFool 08:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  09:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)