HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 26 (Jun 23-29): I agree)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2280 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]  
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 24]] (Jun 9-15) ===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
I'm up for an important place. There always been '''[[The Field]]''', '''[[The Stick]]''' and '''[[Homestar Runner's House]]'''? However, [[The Field]] would '''drastically''' need an intro cleanup, and [[The Stick]] would need an intro cleanup too. [[Homestar Runner's House]] is the best choice, so I'd go with that. That's '''always''' been around since like '''day 5'''. Unless anybody else can think of something else, I'm for Homestar's House. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:Of the three, I'd say we do [[Homestar Runner's House]]. Of course, The Stick and especially The Field have been around forever, but as you said they need to be updated, so the armless white guy's abode would be the best bet. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
:Maintenance coming in: We're going to far out in terms of dates right now. We're now talking about eleven weeks ahead of today; we really should keep the discussions a little closer than this. Go ahead and discuss this one, but could we please not add any more weeks for a bit? Thanks. Resume discussion. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
:Oh, and if I might make a bit of a plug: I'm working on a subpage about guidelines for FAS: [[User:Heimstern Läufer/FAS]]. I welcome comments and improvements, especially from any regulars in the discussion here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
::Sure, Homestar's House is cool. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 25]] (Jun 16-22) ===
+
===Redirects===
-
[[A Folky Tale]]? Full-length toon with quite a bit of content, not to mention funny. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:I hate to burst your bubble, but if we're going to be featuring A Jorb Well Done for Week 20, then maybe we should do something else, so that we don't have to worry about exhausting everything instantly. I think that's what you said about "Homestar and Marzipan's Relationship". I would like to feature this, though; just not so soon. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::Well, the comparison is not exactly valid. There are many toon articles that can be featured, but few relationship articles. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Well, alright, I guess we can do it, then. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::Wait, I got a better idea. Why don't we just do [[Saddy Dumpington]], the character? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 21:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
:::::I like that idea.  Not many Strong Sad variants get featured, and this article has an extensive write up (more than enough to act as a teaser and justify the More) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::::::And besides, when I said something about exhausting the toons, I meant big toons. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
:::::::Sure. Just keep in mind Folky Tale for a future FA. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::::::Saddy Dumpington is a fine choice. His character is equal in significance to [[A Folky Tale]] (a writeup about either one would cover pretty much the same content), so if people like the idea of featuring the character better, I say let's go for it. And we can even put a watch link for A Folky Tale at the end of the writeup! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 26]] (Jun 23-29) ===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
How about [[Summer Short Shorts]]? It would have to be summer by now. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:Sounds like a fine idea to me. (Although interestingly enough, my local school district only gets out of school this very week, so summer will only be beginning here!) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::It kind of fits since summer starts on June 21'st. sounds like a good idea! {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 02:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 27]] (Jun 30-Jul 6) ===
+
==Article discussions==
-
Since we already featured [[Happy Fireworks]], how about [[Cardboard Marzipan]]? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 21:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I guess we could do that. Another thing we should try is [[Fireworks]]. Of course, that one would need to be updated drastically. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 21:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah, which is too bad, since Fireworks is definitely better connected to July 4th. But then, there's no obligation to do a July 4th article, so there's no harm in doing a one with a loose connection like Carboard Marzi. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 24 April 2008
+
-
:::On the other hand, if we're going to do Saddy two weeks prior, this could be a bit of an overdose of character variations. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::As an alternative, how about something tangentially related?  Like how Homestar Runner wants to dress up as Uncle Sam in [[Strong Bad Is A Bad Guy]]?  (I know, I know, it's a stretch....) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::It's a stretch, but I see no reason not to do it anyway. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 28]] (Jul 7-13) ===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
Have we featured [[The Announcer]] yet? If so, how about [[Homestarloween Party]]? --[[User:Technochocolate|Technochocolate]] 03:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC) <font color=white>Or specially marked.</font color>
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Getting pretty far out in advance again; let's not go any further than this week for a bit, OK?
+
-
:We haven't featured The Announcer yet. That article could possibly use some expansion before featuring, but it's a possibility. [[Homestarloween Party]]'s been featured (and we usually save Halloween toons to be featured at Halloween, anyway). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah, let's slow down a little bit, huh? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 08:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Ten weeks is enough. I think we have 12 now. Let's hold it to 10 - guideline suggestion? Question mark? The Announcer works for me. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::First, The Announcer sounds reasonable to me, but secondly, let's slow ''way'' down a little bit, huh? We keep getting too far out ahead. Let's add more once we get below five or six weeks ahead (by then, the first 26 weeks will likely be in the archives and it'll be time for weeks 27 through 52). In the meantime, if it's any comfort to you, we can keep discussing ideas for the weeks that are already on here. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Oh, and by the way, in regards to the Halloween toons, can I be the first to make a suggestion there, please? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::If someone could expand '''[[Irregular Loading Screens]]''', then it would be a great choice. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 19:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 29]] (Jul 14-20) ===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
One of the [[Thy Dungeonman]] games. [[User:Empaire|Empaire]] 12:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:How about an actual person? Say, [[Missy Palmer]] or [[Ryan Sterritt]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::As important as Missy is to H*R, her write up is a bit thin.  Ryan's page is actually of decent length.  May I also suggest [[Y-O-U]] as a possibility (their contributions have been key a number of TBC's musical projects).  {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 06:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::No. It is one of the Dungeonman games or else. Since we have already featured the Dungeonman himself and [[ye flask]], it makes sense to feature one of the Dungeonman games. [[User:Empaire|Empaire]] 10:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Umm, no, it's not "one of the Dungeonman games or else". You don't get to make decisions like that. I'd say we ought to feature Ryan, personally. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I like the idea of featuring [[Ryan Sterritt]] too. And we should expand Missy's article sometime; she should be featured at some point. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 30]] (Jul 21-27) ===
+
==General discussion==
-
Since it has been talked quite a bit, why don't we feature [[techno]] for this week? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I'm down. Oh, wait, I mean, the system is down. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 31]] (Jul 28-Aug 3) ===
 
-
How about [[Lowercase i's]]? That's becoming a quite large inside joke. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 22:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:Sure, Lowercase i's would be good. That one has a decent amount of text anyway. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 32]] (Aug 4-Aug 10) ===
 
-
Since we haven't done one in a while, how about a TGS issue? I'm thinking [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 1|the first one]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:I would advise against us featuring TGS 1 for this reason: It's a subset of the email [[comic]]. Therefore, it makes more sense to feature that email instead, as it helps show where TGS came from and gives us the first episode.
 
-
:As an alternative, perhaps TGS 11, since it has a summer theme? Alternatively, we could wait a few weeks and do TGS 4, with its back-to-school theme. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::I like the idea of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 11]] being featured for this week.  TGS as a whole has not been featured enough. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::Okay, let's just do [[comic]], then, huh? I agree that TGS isn't shown more often, but let's try to save some of the post-tenth issue ones (i.e., Issue 11) for later. Besides, wouldn't it be overkill to have two summer-themed toons in a short timespan, since I proposed Summer Short Shorts at one point? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::In agreement. Let's do the email comic. It'll be just like featuring a TGS comic, but this shows where it came from. (I actually didn't know until now) [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 01:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::::If we're going to do techno two weeks before, I don't think we should do another email this week. I don't see any reason we can't do two summer-themed cartoons, but if we don't want to, I still suggest delaying TGS a few weeks and doing Issue 4 (partly because we haven't featured many early TGS episodes). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::I say we shouldn't do any more summer themed Featured Articles. If any school people are at all like me (and I know some are), they will be thinking "Aww man, we hafta go back to school again soon!" by August. I think [[comic]] would be a good idea. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::And I still say two emails separated by only one week is too many in such a short timespan. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
(KOs colons and throws them into an active volcano) Not really... We have nearly 200 SBEmails total. I doubt that many have been featured. There are more SBEmails than anything else. It's not a big deal. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 13:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:Yeah. I'm surprised we haven't featured emails more often! So we should not complain about having emails close together. Besides, there was one time where was an entire week's worth of Tandy 400 emails, I seem to recall. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
Sorry to burst your bubble guys, but [[comic]] was featured for week 31, 2005. How about the [[locker room]]?  [[User:Hazzard4123|Hazzard4123]] 18:05 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:But that was actually just an article on the series as a whole. I'm talking about the actual email. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::So was I. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 00:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example:

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Personal tools