|
|
(includes 1821 intermediate revisions) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | <div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center"> |
| + | '''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.''' |
| + | </div> |
| {{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}} | | {{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}} |
- | Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|featured article nominations]]. | + | |
| + | [[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| + | |
| + | Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]]. |
| | | |
| ==Checklist== | | ==Checklist== |
- | {{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}} | + | {{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}} |
| *Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard. | | *Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard. |
| *At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache]. | | *At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache]. |
- | *[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image. | + | *[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image. |
- | *Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up. | + | *Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up. |
| *Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page. | | *Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page. |
- | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history]. | + | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history]. |
| *Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history]. | | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history]. |
- | |}<br/> | + | |}<br/> |
| | | |
| ==Discussion archives== | | ==Discussion archives== |
- | <center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | + | <center> |
| + | {| {{standardtable}} |
| + | ! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52 |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2005 |
| + | | |
| + | | |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2006 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2007 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2008 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2009 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2010 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2011 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 2012 |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]] |
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]] |
| + | |} |
| | | |
- | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
| |
| | | |
- | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]] | + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | |
- | | + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] | |
- | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] | | + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]] |
- | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]] | + | |
| </center> | | </center> |
| | | |
- | ==Article discussions== | + | ==Featured Article Queue== |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 50]] (Dec 8-14) ===
| + | {| {{standardtable}} |
- | So, it's gettin' '''really''' cold out (probably), so why don't we do [[winter pool]]? Perfect for this kind of probable weather. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 14:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | ! Week !! Article !! Discussion |
- | :I dunno, it's still not actually winter at this point, not until the 21st. This seems a bit more suited to sometime in January to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}} |
- | ::We could do that the first week of January. How about we do some [[Old-Timey]] character for this week instead? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}} |
- | :::(Heim: Winter doesn't start until December 21??? Sewiously??? {{User:Acam30/sig}} 19:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC))
| + | {{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}} |
- | ::::Yes, winter doesn't start until the 21st. Anyway, I was thinking of an [[Old-Timey]] character, like maybe [[The Sneak]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}} |
- | :::::Let's use something radio related, like [[Radio Sightings]].--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |} |
- | ::::::No, that one does ''not'' have enough information for it to be a worthy article. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::True. [[Radio Sightings]] is only a list. I was thinking about the email [[radio]], but I'm not sure if we should use another email yet.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 02:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::::Let's save [[radio]] for another time. Anyways, I can dig [[The Sneak]] for this week. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::::Just to make it known, i don't think any of the sightings pages will ever make good FAs. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::::::On the topic of winter, [[winter pool]] seemingly took place ''before'' winter came, as there was very little snow, as if winter was a week or so away. But, if we say "no" to it, I'd say that, while I personally think that [[Fluffy Puff Air-Puffed Sugar Delights]] would be a cool Old-Timey FA, The Sneak is fine by me. No futher comments against the flow from me, I promise. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 01:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::::::Hey, I'm cool with [[The Sneak]]. I can't wait for the opportunity to use radio, though.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 03:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::::::: Hmm... How about since its 2 weeks before christmas, how about we do the email [[nightlife]]? it's 2 emails before winter pool , anyway...
| + | |
- | :::::::::::::...I find it a little out of the ordinary that you wuold suggest that at this point in the conversation. I'm wondering what other reason you have for your little interjection. (Also.... I thought we agreed on [[The Sneak]]? {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::::::::::Nah, let's save [[nightlife]] for another time.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 03:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::::::::::Before we do nightlife, we should do "Club Technochocolate". Not now, though. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 51]] (Dec 15-21) === | + | ===Redirects=== |
- | Winter '''FINALLY''' hits this week, so I think the time is right for [[winter pool]]. Any takers? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: |
- | :We frequently do a Decemberween feature this week (like with Halloween, we've traditionally done two features for D'ween). Mind you, I don't have any ideas about what we could feature that's D'ween-related, so if no one thinks of a good one, I'm cool with the pool. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | <pre> |
- | ::Have we featured [[Decemberween In July]] yet? I kinda like that one. (Nice rhyme by the way Heimi.) {{User:Acam30/sig}} 02:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}} |
- | :::D-Ween in July is a sort of short article, in addition, i'd think it'd be better suited to some day in july when people are dreaming of winter... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | </pre> |
- | ::::And in fairness, we have featured a short from "Decemberween In July" around this time some time ago, which was "That Time of Year". Anyway, we could try another toon that was featured then. I'm thinking [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 6]]. How about that one? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | Example: |
- | :::::I think that's a pretty good idea. We could do [[winter pool]] in January then. (Note to Game dude386, I'm really not trying to ignore your suggestions; it's just that we like to do seasonal FAs sometimes, and this is a good chance. Plus it's not that long until January!) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | <pre> |
- | ::::::I also support TGS 6. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 22:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}} |
- | :::::::A little close after featuring [[Whats-her-face]], but on the whole, why not? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 02:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | </pre> |
- | ::::::::Well, it's not like it hasn't happened before. For Week 4 of this year, we had So and So, followed three weeks later by TGS Issue 12. So this has happened before. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 52]] (Dec 22-28) ===
| + | Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well. |
- | Since we featured Summer Short Shorts previously (coincidentally, about halfway through the year!), I think the Decemberween article we should feature is the follow up to this one: [[Decemberween Short Shorts]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :I would be in support of that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::I was gonna suggest that one for last week but I wasn't sure if we'd featured it yet. I would be in support of that also. (No mocking tone intended Heimi ol' buddy.) {{User:Acam30/sig}} 15:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::: I suggest a Decemberween themed email, how about [[what I want]] ? [[User:Sp0ng3b0b|Sp0ng3b0b]] 10:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::what I want has been done already. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 11:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::Even if it was available, it would have to be a minor article before the major article, which was exactly how it was done when it ''did'' receive its own article. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | So, [[Decemberween Short Shorts]]? {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 23:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :Yeah, I think so, and not just because of Decemberween, either, but also because we did Summer Short Shorts, too. That was exactly halfway through the year, for Week 26! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 1]] (Dec 29-Jan 4) === | + | ==Article discussions== |
- | For this week, and the start of the new year, I decided that we should ''finally'' use That Game Dude's suggestion that has been proposed for several weeks but kept getting bumped off: the email [[winter pool]]. Now that all of the major holidays are out of the way, I think we can do that one at last. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :I'd be a hypocrite to say no. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 20:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::After all, what better way to ring in the new year than to sink into a pool full of gelatin? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::I have to agree with you on that one Heimi. Who wouldn't? Support [[winter pool]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::[[Winter pool]]? Sounds good to me {{User:Tatpoj121/sig}} 21:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::Yeah, that'd be perfect. It'd be the first time we ever did a post-2006 email. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 21:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 2]] (Jan 5-11) === | + | == Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion == |
- | In the past, about this week, we usually feature something related to either [[20X6]] or [[Trogdor]]. This year, I was thinking of doing both at the same time with the Trogdor-centric toon: [[Happy Trogday]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.'' |
- | :I'm up for it! {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 02:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::With a 20X6 reference to boot! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 02:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::I was thinking [[Trogday 08]]. It is the newest Trogdor-related cartoon and there is some historical significance (with the theme of [[The S is for sucks dragon]]) Any takers?{{User:Tatpoj121/sig}} 01:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::Who said it had to be a new toon? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::No one. just a suggestion.{{User:Tatpoj121/sig}} 03:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::I think Trogday 08 is a good idea for sometime, but since Happy Trogday was suggested first and has a high degree of support, we should go for that this time. Incidentally, Tatpoj, if there's already a suggestion on this page and you make a new suggestion, it's best to make sure you address the previous suggestions and why you think yours is preferable (this is not really a vote, but rather a discussion). Keep on keeping on! {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::Also, I personally think we should do TSifS before Trogday 08. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 01:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 3]] (Jan 12-18) === | + | ==Stalled Discussions== |
- | This will mark a while since we've done a character or pseudocharacter. I think it would be well worth our time to feature [[Tire]]: A remarkably detailed article about an inanimate object that is nonetheless often treated as a character. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. '' |
- | :That'd be a great one! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::I'm surprised ol' Poppy the Tire wasn't featured already! Go for it! {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 02:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::After becoming the national symbol of [[Strong Badia the Free|The Cheat and Tireia]], it's a good time to feature the sole inhabitant of Strong Badia. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 4]] (Jan 19-25) === | + | ==General discussion== |
- | While we are on the subject of former countries in [[Strong Badia The Free]], I think we should do a location that needs an article badly: namely, [[Club Technochocolate]] (formerly [[Strong Badia The Free|Pompomerania]]). It's been a while since we've done an actual location anyway. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :It seems like a solid article to me; I'm cool with it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::As a location in the HR universe, I'm down with it, but we should feature [[SBCG4AP]] and all the games in it before we start listing SBTF loctions... or better yet, we could do SBCG4AP and the games on a daily baisis, like we did for Puppet Jams and other puppet stuff a while back. Sound good? Otherwise, [[Club Technochocolate]] is good, but I think we can hold it off until SBCG4AP has been featured... {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 14:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::I'm not talking about doing Pompomerania, I'm talking about just doing what it really is: Club Technochocolate. As for doing SBCG4AP on a weekly basis, we only have five episodes, not seven. And any of them would work well solo, I think. So I'm only talking about Club Technochocolate for this week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::OK, CTC is good, and next week I'll elaborate on my plans to feature SBCG4AP... {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 5]] (Jan 26-Feb 2) ===
| |
- |
| |
- | OK, so here's my proposal for an SBCG4AP week: We feature [[SBCG4AP]], [[SBCG4AP Dev Blog]], and each of the five episodes daily. Great idea, or no? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 00:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | :Except maybe for the Dev Blog, I think those are all important enough to get a whole week, not just a day. How about just [[SBCG4AP]] for now, and feature the individual episodes another time? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | ::OK. Man, I ''still'' can't beleive we haven't already done it! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 00:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | :::<s>I think we were waiting to feature it until all 5 episodes were released, and until it was cleaned up a little bit. Personally, I think the actual [[SBCG4AP]] page should just be a disambig sometimes, and I certainly don't think it's ready for featuring. </s> {{User:Acam30/sig}} 16:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::Wow! Look who forgot to read the article before she commented again! <nowiki>*</nowiki>hits head on keyboard<nowik>*</nowiki> Nevermind guys, Disregard. {{User:Acam30/sig}} 16:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::Okay, I'm sure we can do SBCG4AP now. Not the individual games, but just the series as a whole. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::::Note to Acam30: Although in current times they haven't been released, by the time we get to feature this article, it'll be late Janurary... I sure '''''hope''''' they've all been released for a while!!! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 22:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::::Rest assured TGD, they will all be out by this time. I found out that [[8-Bit Is Enough]] will be released this upcoming Monday (on the 15th). [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ===[[HRWiki:Featured Article for 2009, week 6]] (Feb 3-9)===
| |
- |
| |
- | I think the next should be [[Tis True, Pom Pom, Tis True]].
| |
- |
| |
- | {{User:Ninja pom pom/sig}} 21:36, 10 December 2008
| |
- |
| |
- | Yes! I agree.
| |
- | {{User:Marzie500/sig}}
| |
- | :I guess we could do it. We don't usually feature non-website material very often. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ::Well, most people don't know alot about it because they don't have the dvd, I wish, but I don't have ''ANY''!--[[User:Ninja pom pom|Ninja pom pom]] 02:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- | :::Maybe these articles would raise awareness of the DVDs. I have two of them. And one DVD-only thing ([[Real-Live E-mails]]) has already been featured. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | :::Right! [[User:Ninja pom pom|Ninja pom pom]] 22:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ==General discussion==
| |
| ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)=== | | ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)=== |
| In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like: | | In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like: |
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.