HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Because you should let other people nominate something. There's also nine other nominations without consensus.)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 871 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
===Redirects===
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
+
<pre>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
+
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_1-10|2010, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
+
-
</center>
+
==Article discussions==
==Article discussions==
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 22]] (May 31-Jun 6)===
 
-
How about a Videlectrix game? We have available: [[Secret Collect]], [[Rhino Feeder]], [[Thy Dungeonman]], [[Population: Tire]], [[Pigs on Head]], [[Thy Dungeonman 2]], [[50K Racewalker]], [[Duck Guardian One]], and [[Thy Dungeonman 3]]. [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] [[User talk:RickTommy|talk]] [[Image:slang.PNG|50px]] 01:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:Based on the ones listed here, I would say [[Population: Tire]] is probably the best bet. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::I'd pick one of the Thy Dungeonman games.
 
-
:::Either Pop Tire or a Dungeonman game would probably be good choices. Can't decide which I prefer at this point. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I always thought [[Retro Gaming Character Variations]] was an interesting article. But out of the games, I think Thy Dungeonman games have more information. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 00:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::So which will it be? It's almost time.
 
-
:::::Well, two of us are going for one of the Thy Dungeonman games, and two of us aree going for Pop Tire. I guess you're gonna be the deciding vote. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::Yes, I'm in favour of a Dungeonman game. Not sure which one, though. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::I'd have to go with [[Thy Dungeonman 3]]. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::[[Thy Dungeonman]] is now featured.  Although it's shorter than [[Thy Dungeonman 3]], being that it is the first installment in the franchise, it deserves to be featured first.  --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 15:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::::how 'bout...[[20X6 vs. 1936]], [[Xeriouxly Forxe]] or [[DELETED!]] for next month (June)? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.79.130|206.116.79.130]] 21:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::::If you want it featured then, you need to make that suggestion on the appropriate week below. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 23]] (Jun 7-13)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
For this week, how about the [[jibblies]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Jibblies seems like a good choice. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)<small>jibbliejibbliejibblejibblejibbliejibbliejibblie</small>
+
-
::I dunno, while not completely centered on Halloween, I think jibblies would be a good FA around, say, October. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 02:31, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, how about [[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]]? I'd have to say it's better written than the jibblies. Looks like random page finally payed off. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::I was just about to suggest that. Let's do [[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]]! {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
:::::Maybe the original idea of the Jibblies would work. [['d]] and [[-ed]] are great choices as well, though, as well as [[The Announcer]], and [[New Paper]], since this is the time the New Paper was introduced. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Suggesting five ideas at the same time won't work, Ricky. 'd and -ed aren't too interesting, The Announcer is pretty short, and New Paper needs to be worked on. Even if this is the time it was introduced, it needs a better article first. --[[User:Kingdom Stars|Kingdom Stars]] 14:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::[[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]] has been featured. It seemed a little more cohesive than [[jibblies]] and seemed better organized.  Although not animated, the image was good too! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 15:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::so, the [[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]] won, did it? i'm okay with that. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 05:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 24]] (Jun 14-20)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
For this week, how about [[Strong Bad's Computer Malfunctioning]]? We could have the intro and all the little descriptions after it, sort of like [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 26|that article on characters lacking certain body parts]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:That could work, although I'd prefer [[The Virus]]. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah, let's do The Virus! {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 25]] (Jun 21-27)===
+
==General discussion==
-
How about [[The Reddest Radish]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:While this is (once again) over the limit of ten, there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus in some of the nominations above. Why not contribute your opinion there first instead of adding more weeks? {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 00:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
+
-
I agree with Strong Awesome in that you should discus other things before bringing up something else. On a more related note, I don't really like the idea of featuring Reddish Raddish, but I don't know what we could replace it with. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:I came up with something: [[404'd]]. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
::Nevermind. That needs expansion. How abut [[Homestar Ruiner]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:::If we were to do individual SBCG4AP episodes, they should be done in increments at a time. Instead, might I propose something that had been proposed before, but got bumped off by something else: [[Sterrance]], but not Da Huuuuuuuudge, since the former appeared more often than the latter, and it was the one SB claimed to have gotten right. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::Sterrance sounds good. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
Since we just did Sterrance, how about [[Basement of The Brothers Strong]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 26]] (Jun 28-Jul 4)===
 
-
[[Cardboard Marzipan]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:What did the man say to you above? --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water|Essence of Ghost Water]] 12:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::At this point, we're exactly 10 weeks out, so he's OK this time. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 12:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::Oh. Anyhow, Cardboard Mazipan is a good choice. It's certainly better than [[Cardboard Homestar]]. --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water|Essence of Ghost Water]] 12:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::While Heim's right and he's ok within the 10-week limit, [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]], why don't you give others a chance to make initial suggestions during the new few FA weeks for a change?  There is no need to rush the FA process and you should give others a chance to weigh in their suggestions without them feeling rushed or like they need to follow a specific topic.  Thanks. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 27]] (Jul 5-11)===
 
-
[[New Paper]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:Can We do [[Lookin' At a Thing In a Bag]] now? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
::Umm, what about my idea instead? And besides, you could move this suggestion to Aug 2-8. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::Your idea totally ignored the [[User talk:RickTommy#featured article|repeated messages]] to your talk page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::New Paper is sloppy and not written well. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
::::I disagree. Besides, it's been nearly a year since the New Paper "died", so if it's going to be featured, it'll hafta be around now. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 28]] (Jul 12-18)===
 
-
[[Li'l Brudder]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Spotlight hogger. :P
 
-
That aside, Lil Brudder is a good idea. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:I agree. Yeah, not much to say. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 02:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 29]] (Jul 19-25)===
 
-
We usually feature a Sbemail around this time. How about either [[rock opera]], [[bottom 10]], [[your friends]], [[death metal]], or [[different town]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
You know, there's not much consensus on anything else. If you're so eager to get things done, I request you help with the others before you throw something else out. <br><br>Yeah, we could do bottom 10. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:And we need to keep this list below ten. And let someone else come up with an idea sometimes, please! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 30]] (Jul 26-Aug 1)===
 
-
It does end on August 2nd, right? Anyways, how about [[Everybody to the Limit]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:That'd be a good one. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]]
 
-
::Good. Also, I beat RickTommy. :D {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:::No, July has 31 days. The week ends on August 1. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 15:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::Ah. Thanks for clearing that up for me. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 31]] (Aug 2-8)===
 
-
I'd like to go with a pseudocharacter for this week. [[Charlemagne]] seems likea good choice, but [[Wormdingler]] and [[Credenza]] would work too. --[[User:Kingdom Stars|Kingdom Stars]] 12:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 32]] (Aug 9-15)===
 
-
For this week, how about something proposed long ago: [[SXSW Panel - 14 Mar 2005|the SXSW Panel from March 2005]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:It's comical and worthy of being featured. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 12:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::How about something 20X6-related instead? Perhaps either [[Make-O Your Own Stinko]] or [[Stinkoman 20X6]] (I know we're waiting until it's finished, but at the rate the site is going, I don't think it'll ever be finished)? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::How about discussion rather than just throwing out ideas while ignoring previous suggestions? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 12:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::If we're going to do an interview or public appearance, how about a more notable one? I can't really think of one (I'm not really into that sort of stuff), and besides, I wholeheartedly believe that we should do something 20X6-related this week. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::RickTommy, that's the same thing you suggested for last week before it was deleted. So stop hogging the spotlight. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 12:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
We could do [[NYU Talk - 1 Mar 2005]]. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:For the record, the reason MHarrington suggested the interview he did was because of [[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_11-20#HRWiki:Featured_article_for_2010.2C_week_17_.28Apr_26-May_2.29|This.]] We opted for [[The Couch]] then. I like this specific interview, so I'm for it. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 20:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::This seems like a good idea. The only mild concern I have (which I alluded to last time) is the possibility that the writeup might be too short (it's a fairly short interview). If we can get a good writeup, though, I'm all for it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::As I said, I think a more notable interview/public appearance should be featured instead. And what about my 20X6 suggestion? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::RickTommy, sometimes consensus doesn't go your direction. I think in this case that's what's happening: people are disagreeing with both of your points and favouring another option besides your suggestion. You've clearly stated that you think a more substantial appearance should be chosen and that you think this week should be 20X6. Others disagree. Constantly reiterating is not going to change people's minds, rather, it's going to make them annoyed. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Per that guy above me. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 21:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 33]] (Aug 16-22)
 
-
[[sloshy|ʎɥsols]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:39, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools