HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(undid revision 707506; Please don't remove or edit other user's comments.)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 766 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
-
 
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
+
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
-
 
+
|-
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
+
| 2005
-
 
+
|
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
|
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]  
+
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_1-10|2010, Weeks 1-10]] |  
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
</center>
</center>
Line 37: Line 90:
{| {{standardtable}}
{| {{standardtable}}
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
{{FA queue| 26 Jul 2010 |Everybody to the Limit}}
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
{{FA queue|  2 Aug 2010 |Credenza}}
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
{{FA queue| 9 Aug 2010 |SXSW Panel - 14 Mar 2005}}
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
{{FA queue| 16 Aug 2010 |Play Date}}
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
-
{{FA queue| 23 Aug 2010 |Heavy Lourde}}
+
-
{{FA queue| 30 Aug 2010 |Gavin}}
+
-
{{FA queue| 6 Sep 2010 |Sloshy}}
+
|}
|}
-
===[[Everybody to the Limit]]===
+
===Redirects===
-
:''{{done}} {{FA|26 Jul 2010}}''
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
It does end on August 2nd, right? Anyways, how about [[Everybody to the Limit]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
<pre>
-
:That'd be a good one. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]]
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
::Good. Also, I beat RickTommy. :D {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
</pre>
-
:::No, July has 31 days. The week ends on August 1. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 15:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
::::Ah. Thanks for clearing that up for me. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
<pre>
-
:::::Yes! Everybody to the Limit is a great idea.
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
 
+
</pre>
-
===[[Credenza]]===
+
-
:''{{done}} {{FA|2 Aug 2010}}''
+
-
I'd like to go with a pseudocharacter for this week. [[Charlemagne]] seems like a good choice, but [[Wormdingler]] and [[Credenza]] would work too. --[[User:Kingdom Stars|Kingdom Stars]] 12:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:Credenza would work, I suppose. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::I like Credenza. --[[Special:Contributions/79.221.47.243|79.221.47.243]] 22:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
===[[SXSW Panel - 14 Mar 2005]]===
+
-
:''{{done}} {{FA|9 Aug 2010}}''
+
-
For this week, how about something proposed long ago: [[SXSW Panel - 14 Mar 2005|the SXSW Panel from March 2005]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:It's comical and worthy of being featured. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 12:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::We could do [[NYU Talk - 1 Mar 2005]]. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
:::For the record, the reason MHarrington suggested the interview he did was because of [[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_11-20#HRWiki:Featured_article_for_2010.2C_week_17_.28Apr_26-May_2.29|This.]] We opted for [[The Couch]] then. I like this specific interview, so I'm for it. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 20:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::This seems like a good idea. The only mild concern I have (which I alluded to last time) is the possibility that the writeup might be too short (it's a fairly short interview). If we can get a good writeup, though, I'm all for it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::As I said, I think a more notable interview/public appearance should be featured instead. And what about my 20X6 suggestion? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::::RickTommy, sometimes consensus doesn't go your direction. I think in this case that's what's happening: people are disagreeing with both of your points and favouring another option besides your suggestion. You've clearly stated that you think a more substantial appearance should be chosen and that you think this week should be 20X6. Others disagree. Constantly reiterating is not going to change people's minds, rather, it's going to make them annoyed. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Per that guy above me. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 21:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::RickTommy, I think you really need to focus on everything else besides just this. You're really hogging it. Why don't you do Recent Changes instead? You can edit often and not just hog! My vote anyway is really for any interview. We haven't done any in several months. [[User:Doctorwho295|doctorwho295]] 15 June 2010
+
-
:::::::::We really need to focus on some interview for this week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::[[All Things Considered Interview - 8 May 2005]]? {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 21:54, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
===[[Play Date]]===
+
-
:''{{done}} {{FA|16 Aug 2010}}''
+
-
I hope I as an Anonny am tolerated to make this suggestion. It's been on my mind for some time. Shorts seem to get featured rather rarely for some reason and this is one of my favorites. --[[Special:Contributions/79.221.32.11|79.221.32.11]] 10:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:Yeah it has been a while since we've featured a short. we could also do [[Ballad of The Sneak]], [[One Two, One Two]] or [[No Hands On Deck]] {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 17:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::Play Date sounds like a really good one. I still think that's one of the most fun ideas TBC've had yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 16:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
+
 +
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
==Article discussions==
==Article discussions==
-
===[[Strong Bad Sings]]===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
How about [[Strong Bad Sings]] instead? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:If you're talking about the toon, that's too short to work. If you're talking about the CD, we already did that. I'm all for featuring [[Credenza]]. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
::For once, RickTommy, actually focus on what is already suggested instead of hogging the spotlight. --[[User:Kingdom Stars|Kingdom Stars]] 02:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
+
 +
==Stalled Discussions==
 +
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
===[[Stinkoman 20X6]]===
+
==General discussion==
-
How about something 20X6-related instead? Perhaps either [[Make-O Your Own Stinko]] or [[Stinkoman 20X6]] (I know we're waiting until it's finished, but at the rate the site is going, I don't think it'll ever be finished)? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:How about discussion rather than just throwing out ideas while ignoring previous suggestions? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 12:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::If we're going to do an interview or public appearance, how about a more notable one? I can't really think of one (I'm not really into that sort of stuff), and besides, I wholeheartedly believe that we should do something 20X6-related this week. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::RickTommy, that's the same thing you suggested for last week before it was deleted. So stop hogging the spotlight. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 12:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::::What's more, Stinkoman 20X6 is still incomplete. And judging by how things are looking on the website now, I think it will always remain incomplete. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Um, I said almost those exact words. Yes, it doesn't look like it will ever be finished. So it's no use waiting for it to be finished before we can feature it. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 06:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::::We ''could'' do Make-o Your Own Stinko... {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
::::::I'd prefer to wait a while before featuring this one; too early to give up hope.  But Sinko-related articles are just as good! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
+
-
===[[Heavy Lourde]]===
 
-
It's probably major enough to warrant a feature. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
===Week before Halloween 2010===
 
-
It will soon be that time of year once again, All Hallows Eve. Traditionally, we have two Halloween-themed articles, one for the week before Halloween (a minor Halloween toon or something Halloween-related) and one for the week during Halloween (a major Halloween toon). Anyway, for the week before Halloween, I'm thinking of a Puppet thing, [[Homestar vs. Little Girl 2]] (this one even mentions that a Halloween toon would be released later in the week). [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:How about [[That-a-Ghost]] instead? And since there are hundreds of Ween-themed articles on this wiki, how about one the week after Ween as well? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::I don't think we should do more than two. It'd be just too much of an awesome thing. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I'm not saying I'm in favor of doing three weeks, but if we did do it, then we would have to do the Fan Costumes series. Okay, I'm done. And as for the week before Halloween, I think we've just done [[Parsnips A-Plenty]] recently. How long has it been since we've done a [[Puppet Stuff]] toon? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 04:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I support featuring [[That-A-Ghost]]. --[[User:Power Pie|Power Pie]] 12:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::I agree with MHarrington - 1 vote for the Puppet Thingy. (That Anonny Guy)--[[Special:Contributions/79.221.32.92|79.221.32.92]] 10:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===Week of Halloween 2010===
 
-
For the week during Halloween, I'm thinking [[Happy Hallow-day]]. It's so different from anything else. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:I'd like to see either [[3 Times Halloween Funjob]] or [[Jibblies 2]] instead. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:: Hmm..... have we done [[Most in the Graveyard]] yet? I support the Happy Hallow-day idea too, just throwing in another idea if anyone wants it. [[User:doctorwho295|doctorwho295]] 8 August 2010
 
-
:::[[Doomy Tales of The Macabre]], perhaps? --{{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
::::I wouldn't do something so recent. Jibblies 2 or something older would have my vote. (That Anonny Guy)--[[Special:Contributions/79.221.32.92|79.221.32.92]] 10:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Where's The Cheat?]]===
 
-
I'm suprised it hasn't been featured yet - I think it's the toon that most emphasises the site. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:Agreed. Let's do it. [[User:doctorwho295|doctorwho295]] 8 August 2010
 
-
 
-
===[[Sloshy]]===
 
-
For Aug 16-22. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:What's so special about August 16 that would make you want to feature Sloshy then? {{User:Phlip/sig}} 10:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::[[concert]] originally was released on August 20, which is during that week. That's nearest I can guess. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 10:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I think sloshy is a fine choice for an FA. I don't think we should bend over backward to time it for the anniversary, though. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::I'm gonna have to go with Heimstern on this one. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
===[[sisters]]===
 
-
Before I forget, I had previously suggested this one in the old format but was too soon to feature.  I think it'd be a nice feature for the next time we do an email.  --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:I'm not sure if it's important enough for a week to itself... {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 07:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::Why not? I think it's a real classic and would make a good feature. (That Anonny Guy)--[[Special:Contributions/79.221.32.92|79.221.32.92]] 10:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Gavin]]===
 
-
I wrote a potential [[User:DorianGray/Featured Article: Gavin|FA writeup]] for Gavin a while ago, and I'd still like to hear people's opinions on it. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:The writeup looks good. I'm all for adding it to the queue. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 22:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[On Point Kings]]===
 
-
I think we should do an article on the [[On Point Kings]] before the year ends. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:Sure, but you or me is going to have to consult higher authority for a date. [[User:doctorwho295|doctorwho295]] 12 August 2010
 
-
::Probably after Halloween? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I'd say it's a good choice of article; lots of info about a fairly obscure group. I think it'll get into the queue sometime, after Halloween is a strong possibility. Incidentally, there's some discussion on the talk page for this page about how to decide the order of the queue. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Fonts]]===
 
-
It's the biggest page on this wiki - I think it deserves to be featured sometime soon. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:It seems too list-like and without enough prose to make a good feature to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Strong Bad and Strong Sad's Relationship]]===
 
-
The most obvious relationship on the site, and one that I have audibly cried at. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:An interesting topic, but the intro is pretty short. Could we maybe expand it? Then it'd probably make a fine feature. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Answering Machine]]===
 
-
An important item. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[Theme Song Video]]===
 
-
One of the earliest toons on the site. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[The Reddest Radish]]===
 
-
Another early toon that I believe is overdue to be featured. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===A Daily===
 
-
Sometime soon, can we have a week of daily articles? I was thinking maybe stuff on [[Old Flash Stuff]] or some [[Main Pages]]. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[No Hands on Deck!]]===
 
-
How about it? It's a great toon and I thinks it's definitely worth being featured. Oh and also, RickTommy, stop with all the suggestions please. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 16:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"