HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 27 (Jun 29-Jul 5))
(with the notice we can also restore the old text, update notice)
 
(includes 1524 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
-
 
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death-Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 27]] (Jun 29-Jul 5)===
+
===Redirects===
-
I think it's time for another [[Old-Timey]] character. I'm thinking of either [[Fat Dudley]], [[Old-Timey Bubs]] or [[Old-Timey Marzipan]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirectsDue to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FAWhen an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:This is the middle of the year, and because the page doesn't specify a release date, I think this week would be great for acknowledging the 10th anniversary of [[Marshmallow's Last Stand]].  As we don't know the date of release, the middle of the year gives us the best all round coverage of this significant subject{{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 02:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::Unfortunately, however, Marshmallow's Last Stand was already given an article [[HRWiki:Featured_articles/Archive_1#Week_33.2C_2005|a ''long'' time ago]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 14:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Well, about 4 years ago... isn't that when the old wiki was around?  I think that 4 yrs is long enough between repeats, and this is a VERY significant toon (like, the first full toon or something?).  If not this, then we should do something RELATING to this.  {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 09:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::Nah, FAs started under the new wiki. As for repeating an FA, we've never done so in the past, and I'm disinclined to do so now, at least until we get to the point we really have very few new featurable articles. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
:::::Shouldn't we expand the intro to [[fireworks]] and feature that for Independence Day? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::::::I don't live in the USA, and that thought never crossed my mindYeah, lets do it, or [[Happy Fireworks]].  Either one.  {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 14:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
:::::::Happy Fireworks has already been featured. As for [[fireworks]], find a way to expand the intro and we could definitely do that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::::::Is it long enough now or should it be expanded a little more? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 16:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Okay, I think so now. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::I concur. Good prize. Ding. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Well I think it should be Lappy 486 due to it's recent departure. [[User:MICGAGUH]]
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 28]] (Jul 6-12)===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
I'd like to see one of my favourite toons that we still haven't featured get the spotlight this week: [[A Folky Tale]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:That'd be interesting, except we're running out of Big Toons to discuss. Maybe we should go easy in the future, huh? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::I think that's pretty much inevitable. We don't get big toons very often, so starting to exhaust them is pretty much guaranteed. Heck, we're doing better than we were a few months ago now, what with [[Kick-A-Ball]] having been released. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, maybe after they release a few more, whenever that happens? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Ever since 2006, it feels like they either release 0 or 2 Big Toons every year. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Which they have done ever since they started the website. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::The years 2000 and 2005 had 3 Big Toons. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 21:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Well, now that SBemails are gone (maybe) and they've already made 2 toons this year, I'd say more big toons are on the way. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 22:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::I don't have a problem featuring Folky Tale. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.175|132.183.140.175]] 16:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Nor do I. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 17:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Then I guess I don't either. But let's go easy on them in the future, okay? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Besides A Folky Tale, 9 Big Toons haven't got featured yet: [[Kick-a-Ball]], [[Career Day]], [[DNA Evidence]], [[Strongest Man in the World]], [[Shopping for Danger]], [[Parsnips A-Plenty]], [[Where's The Cheat?]], [[The Reddest Radish]], and [[In Search of the Yello Dello]]. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Make that ten with [[2 Part Episode: Part 1]], and if they don't merge part 2. And no, I am not going to keep updating this.[[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 11:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Okay, we can do [[A Folky Tale]], I guess. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 29]] (Jul 13-19)===
+
==Article discussions==
-
For this week, we need to do [[50 emails]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:At the time this week comes around, it will have been about 3 months since we've featured an email ([[email thunder]]). It's a good idea, but many other articles that were good that got turned down by ones that were better (even ones that were suggested by you MHarrington) should be thought about for this week (SB's website, Crack Stuntman, etc.) [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Then how about [[Crack Stuntman]]? Of course, "50 emails" was once suggested but rejected, too. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 23:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::You're right, I forgot. Either one be's fine. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 00:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::So let's just do Crack Stuntman now and we'll do "50 emails" next week and Strong Bad's Website the week after. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Looks like we're swapping this and Week 24 now, so [[Crimes Committed by Strong Bad]] is this week's featured article, and Stuntman will be featured 5 weeks ahead of "plan". {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 11:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 30]] (Jul 20-26)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
I think we should try again to do [[50 emails]] this week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Well, no one's said anything for a while, so I'll go ahead and second it. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::More like, YOU feature [[50 emails]], ''NERD!'' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 31]] (Jul 27-Aug 2)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
As stated from the previous week, we now should feature [[Strong Bad's Website]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:Actually, you stated it the week BEFORE the previous week. [[Seriously]], though, it's a good idea. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 32]] (Aug 3-9)===
+
==General discussion==
-
For this week, I was thinking of the [[Double Deuce]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 04:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:How about [[Doughnuts]]? It's had quite a bit of references, but the intro needs quite a bit of expansion. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::The intro is far too short, nor do I think that it could be expanded beyond what it has.  We're looking for toons, characters or major themes of the site.  While Doughnuts show up in a lot of unusual ways, I don't think it makes a good FA. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Oh! I have a better one!  [[First Time Here?]] is extremely important toon and gets constantly overlooked.  It should be featured. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::[[First Time Here?]] seems like a good article. It's also VERY funny. "Homestarrunner.net:Its Dot Com!" Never gets old. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 20:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::And also, "Check me out! No, seriously, check me out." [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 33]] (Aug 10-16)===
 
-
I still can't believe that [[G]] hasn't been featured yet. It's like, a healthy piece of real estate! --{{User:Darkangel/sig}} 05:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:The big problem with the G article is it has very little prose and is mostly a list.  It's a great theme, but it's not what a FA makes. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::Yeah, and I'm not sure one could really expand it to the point it would be a good FA, though I'd be perfectly happy for someone to prove me wrong on that point. Unless and until someone does so, though, it's not a good choice. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::Well, since it's being debated whether or not to do [[First Time Here]] for week 32, how about doing the article originally intended: the [[Double Deuce]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::Since I upstaged the suggestion for Double D, I'll second featuring [[Double Deuce]] for this week.  Great theme, and a lot of text for an intro. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 23:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Well, I...one...two...Fifth it! For reasons stated above and beyond! Take it away, sig: {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 00:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 34]] (Aug 17-23)===
 
-
For this week, how about [[General Tso's Chicken]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2013

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death-Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example:

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Personal tools