|
|
| (includes 3453 intermediate revisions) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | <div id="shortcut" style="border: 1px dashed blue; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; float: right; clear: both;"> | + | <div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center"> |
| - | Shortcuts:<br />[[HRWiki:FAS]], [[FAS]]</div>
| + | '''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.''' |
| - | ==Discussion Archives==
| + | </div> |
| - | <center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]]</center>
| + | {{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}} |
| | | | |
| - | ==Weeklies==
| + | [[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 11]] (Mar 13-19)===
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | :Okay, next character would probably fit in well here. But the question is, which character's next in line? I'm thinking either [[Marzipan]] or [[The Cheat]], leaning towards Marzie. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
| + | Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]]. |
| - | ::Let's let many of these sit red for a while. I don't want to work too far ahead. Let's put FAS to rest for a coupla weeks. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 12:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::Yeah, that's why I didn't start by suggesting something for each week. I think keeping the links red until about a month or so before is good, getting too far ahead is no good. But I don't see any problem if users want to throw out ideas or anything before then, just as long as all the links stay red until mid-Febuary. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::It's about mid-February right now, so I think we better start deciding again. Something I ''really'' want to see get featured soon is [[The Geddup Noise]]. I added 2 paragraphs to it, and it really deserves to be featured. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::I was on the school librery today browsing this page and several other and said to my self <!--what a wonderfull world--> "The Geddy page is long, nice... It should be feaured!" Alot of work was put into that page (as seen from the long tables on the talk page) and it's also little known. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 17:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::I'd agree to the Geddup Noise, especially now that the list on the talk page is completed. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | |
| - | :::::::I never even though of Geddup noise. Sounds like a good idea. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::Let's get up Geddup! {{User:LePorello/sig}} 00:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::Very nice article. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 23:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::Since we're almost at week 11, can someone make an article? Geddy has definitely won out. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 23:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 12]] (Mar 20-26)=== | + | ==Checklist== |
| | + | {{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}} |
| | + | *Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard. |
| | + | *At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache]. |
| | + | *[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image. |
| | + | *Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up. |
| | + | *Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page. |
| | + | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history]. |
| | + | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history]. |
| | + | |}<br/> |
| | | | |
| - | :Pushing back [[Trogdor]] and [[TROGDOR!]]? I can't find any new information to be added on those pages (Mainly because I did most of the work on Trogdor... Teehee) {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 17:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | ==Discussion archives== |
| - | ::I agree, Trogdor (either the game or the character, I don't really care) was my second choice for featured article. If anyone has the DVD and sees anything that can be added to Trogdor, speak now or forever hold your peace. Whatever that means. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 18:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | + | <center> |
| - | :::I'd like to see Trogdor featured soon, but I'd also like to see one of the main characters featured sometime in the month of March. Perhaps move the Trogodor feature to week 13 or 14? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | + | {| {{standardtable}} |
| - | ::::Waitaminute! Didn't we all agree to to have a main cherecter every this-an'-that amount oe weeks? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | + | ! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52 |
| - | :::::Yup, 12 characters for 12 (Gregorian) months was my plan. Which means March is still in need of the character next in line, probably [[The Cheat]] or [[Marzipan]]. Any opinion between the two? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 05:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | + | |- |
| - | ::::::I think we ought to do them in the order they debuted...debued...um, made their debut. Since he was in the original book, I say The Cheat.; {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | + | | 2005 |
| - | :::::::Well the problem with that idea is that we've already skipped over Pom Pom then. According to the cast list [[Original Book|here]], he should have been second. In any case, I wouldn't mind seeing The Cheat come next. I would suggest us going by how the [[Characters]] page is ordered. Since it's ordered in general order of "when they were made/how integral to the plot they are", If we deviate from it, then we may as well change that order to match the order we put them in here. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 05:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | | |
| - | ::::::::So, no matter what, Homsar will be the last one, right? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | + | | |
| - | :::::::::I would think the last three would obviously be [[The King of Town]], [[The Poopsmith]], and [[Homsar]], yes. The middle 7 characters are the iffy ones. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 05:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] |
| - | ::::::::::I consider Homestar, Strong Bad, Pom Pom, and The Cheat to have debuted simultaneously, since it was the same work [of literature] for all of them. so we haven't skipped anybody. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 07:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] |
| - | :::::::::::Alright, I'm gonna go with [[Pom Pom]], then [[The Cheat]] next, unless anybody disagrees. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 05:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] |
| - | ::::::::::::Nope, that's fine here. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | + | |- |
| | + | | 2006 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2007 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2008 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2009 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2010 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2011 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2012 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 13]] (Mar 27-Apr 2)===
| |
| | | | |
| - | :[[A Jumping Jack Contest]], perhaps? —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 23:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | |
| - | ::What's so special about that toon? Other that is was removed. We already featured and much more popular removed toon once. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] | |
| - | :::Ooh, ooh. An idea. Since [[Trogdor]] will probably be next week, why not [[Stinkoman]]? He was introduced in the email before Trogdor was. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 00:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]] |
| - | ::::Something else other than a character. It would be a PseudoCharacter + 4 characters in a row if this were Stinkoman. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | </center> |
| - | :::::Ok, what about [[Toons]] or [[Toons Menu]]? Preferably [[Toons]]. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 00:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::I like the menu idea. What about an older, abandoned menu? There's many many to choose from, listed in [[Secret Pages#Old Navigation]]... {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 01:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::[[Yearbook Character Page]]. Some of the newer fans aren't familiar with it. Could use a "what happened since" section (With a better name ofcourse). {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::Good choice. Plus it's got that [[Homestar Quiz]] interesting tie-in. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::Ooh, I likes that idea. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 02:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::Looks a lot better now with the blockquotes. Yearbook Character Page, rock, rock on! {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 02:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | I'm not very good at making openings for articles (It took me 20 minutes to write the one for [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]]), so if anyone is willing to make one for he Yearbook, it would be great. We only got less then a week. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 14]] (Apr 3-9)=== | + | ==Featured Article Queue== |
| - | Perhaps feature of the Trogdor articles here? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | {| {{standardtable}} |
| - | :I'd say yes. Trogdor is a huge part of the site, and has branched out in many ways. Keep for sure. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | ! Week !! Article !! Discussion |
| - | ::Go BURNiNATOR! {{User:LePorello/sig}} 03:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}} |
| - | :::And the [[Trogdor|article]] comes... In the night! {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}} |
| | + | {{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}} |
| | + | {{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}} |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 15]] (Apr 10-16)=== | + | ===Redirects=== |
| | + | This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: |
| | + | <pre> |
| | + | {{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}} |
| | + | </pre> |
| | + | Example: |
| | + | <pre> |
| | + | {{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}} |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| - | :Maybe put [[The Cheat]] or [[Marzipan]] in here, depending on who wasn't featured last month? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
| + | Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well. |
| - | ::<strike>[[Pom Pom]]?{{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 07:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)</strike> I'm going with The Cheat now, too. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 03:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I vote [[The Cheat]]. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 00:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::Totally. The chort is a sure bet—wait, which one? The user, or the character? ;) — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::The Cheat came before Marzi. Go with the cheese, or the envil. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::Kinda late now, but Teh C. sounds awesome. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 16]] (Apr 17-23)=== | + | ==Article discussions== |
| - | I'm thinking [[Batman]] would be a great pick, becuase of how many appearances it's had. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 01:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Needs a bit more background, like why they love Batman so much and some quotes from interviews. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::I think it's awesome. Definitely a good article. Does anyone else object? — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I trust Elcool's evaluation. We can probably come up with something else for now. Since there's so many options, nowadays if there's just one serious objection, it's enough to move on. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | Well... [[Flashforward 2006 Seattle - 28 Feb 2006]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :I agree. Flashforward is a dynomite page! It would be pretty cool seeing TBird's name on the Main Page. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | I'm thinking mabye [[Store]] or [[20X6]]? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 01:48, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Both have already been featured. Besides, Store still needs a bit more cleaning up. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 14:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::What about [[Strong Bad's Basement]]? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 16:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::That article needs a bit more info. Currently, my vote is Flashforward. Very full (Good job TBird!) and an interesting article. We'd better be's hurrying up; there's less than a week left. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 10:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::Now we need one of the pics. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 18:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::How 'bout [[:Image:Flashforward Convention.JPG|this one]]? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 18:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::Perfect. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 18:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 17]] (Apr 24-30)=== | + | == Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion == |
| - | How 'bout [[Lack of Visible Arms]]? It's a great article about an interesting subject. There are also enough links in there to keep anyone busy for a week. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 23:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.'' |
| - | :This and [[How Do You Type With Boxing Gloves On?]] are great articles. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::I'm leaning toward Lack of Visible Arms on this one. It seems more organized than Boxing Gloves. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 06:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I agree with Joey. Lack of visible arms is a great idea. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::LoVA gets my vote. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 03:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 18]] (May 1-7)=== | + | ==Stalled Discussions== |
| | + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. '' |
| | | | |
| - | :[[User:Bluebry muffin|Bluebry muffin]] suggested it, [[User:Thunderbird L17|me]] and [[User:Lapper|Lapper]] fixed it, and now I think it would be a decent feature choice. How does everybody feel about [[Strong Badman]]? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | ==General discussion== |
| - | ::I likes that idea. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 13:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I don't know. It just seems a bit too short for my tastes. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 04:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::It's got more than enough appearances. I say let's keep it. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 04:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::I suggested it (did I?), you know I like it. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 04:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::A better, longer article: [[Blue Laser Commander]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::Re: Blubry, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki%3AFeatured_article_nominations&diff=282339&oldid=279130 yup, you suggested it]. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 03:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | Blue Laser Commander? That sounds okay. Any objections? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 17:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Either is OK in my lookings. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 18:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::It kinda seems strange to me that all that info on the Commander's page and not on [[Blue Laser]]'s page, which I feel needs to be greatly expanded. Most of the Commander's article details plot summary that would fit better on [[Blue Laser]]. If we can move the necessary info from Blue Laser Commander to Blue Laser, maybe Blue Laser can be a featured article. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 04:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::We's better reach something quick; there's less than a week left. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 10:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 19]] (May 8-14)=== | + | ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)=== |
| | + | In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like: |
| | | | |
| - | :Another character would probably fit somewhere around here. Should we go by who was created first, or who's used more? 'Cause I'm thinking either [[Bubs]] or [[Strong Mad]] next, leaning towards Graw Mad. (Or maybe [[Strong Sad]]) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki> |
| - | ::Definitely Bubs, I'm thinking. He is on the ball. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki> |
| - | :::Strong Mad. Came earlier than Buh-hubs (MLS vs. AJJC). {{User:LePorello/sig}} 03:53, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]</nowiki> |
| - | ::::Wrong. [[Where My Hat Is At?]] {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]</nowiki> |
| - | Come to think of it, [[Marzipan]] is probably a bit more central of a character than [[Bubs]]. Perhaps feature her this month, and leave Bubs to June or July? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 17:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki> |
| - | :Marzi soundeth good. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 18:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki> |
| - | | + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this) |
| - | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 20]] (May 15-21)===
| + | |
| - | How about the [[Big Knife]]. {{User:Tampo/sig}} 03:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Yeah. That would be cool. {{User:Tampo/sig}} 10:17pm March 18, 2006 (Eastern time)
| + | |
| - | ::Agreed! {{User:Tampo/sig}} 10:27pm March 18, 2006 (Eastern time)
| + | |
| - | :::Yes. Once. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 03:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::Whatev. (Yes) {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::I guess so. It doesn't really seem like that big of a thing, but I guess it would be pretty cool. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::Should use a gallery. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::Okay. Big knife it is. {{User:Tampo/sig}} 13:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::Sounds like a plan. {{User:Tampo/sig}} 8:50am March 19,2006 (Eastern Time)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::I dunno, it seems like a pretty short and uninteresting article. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 16:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::Yeah, and with the [[Talk:Big Knife|debates]] currently going on, we can't feature this until we reach a final concensus. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 04:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | What about the [[Compy 386]]? {{User:LePorello/sig}} 17:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | === [[HRWiki: Featured article for 2006, week 21]] (May 22-29) ===
| + | |
| - | How about [[Crapfully Yours]]? Seems like a sure bet to me. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :I want something other than a character or a gag. I watched [[Cool Things]] today... I forgot how ''awexome'' that toon [[HR:coolthings.html|really is]]. We should make a synopsis of it and make it the FA (and super-duper fix-up the article to make it an excellent representative article). —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::I concur its awexomeness, but should it really be a FA so soon? {{User:LePorello/sig}} 04:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::Sure, everybody's forgotten about it by now. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::You've got a great point. I love [[Cool Things]] too. 61.3-38.7 in favor. Full decision later. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::Either [[Cool Things]] or [[Bug In Mouth Disease]]. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::I'm thinking maybe a computer such as [[Compy 386|The Compy]] or [[Lappy 486|The Lappy]]. Neither have been a featured article. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 03:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::I suggest we feature the Compy the previous week and one of the two suggested toons this week. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 12:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==General Discussion==
| + | |
| - | ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
| + | |
| - | In order to switch to and from daily featured articles, follow these simple steps:
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | <blockquote>'''1)''' Create pages like:<br>
| + | [[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]] |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 7]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 2]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''2)''' Create a redirect to begin with, such as <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50]] redirecting to [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | once it's switched over...<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''3)''' Change the main page text 'This Week's Featured Article' to 'Today's Featured Article'.<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''4)''' Change the main page link to: <br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <code><nowiki>{{HRWiki:Featured article for {{CURRENTYEAR}}, week {{CURRENTWEEK}}</nowiki><span style="color:darkred">, day <nowiki>{{</nowiki>CURRENTDOW}}</span>}}</code><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | once it's ready to be finished...<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''5)''' Create a redirect to end with, such as <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 3]] redirecting to [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''6)''' Change the main page link back to:<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <code><nowiki>{{HRWiki:Featured article for {{CURRENTYEAR}}, week {{CURRENTWEEK}}}}</nowiki></code></blockquote><br>
| + | |
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
