HRWiki:Featured Article Selection
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 16 (Apr 14-20)) |
Sam the Man (Talk | contribs) (Suggestion) |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
Either a week of entertainment running gags or 1 gag featured the whole week. (I think if we only had to pick 1, [[Peanuts]] is the worthiest) [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | Either a week of entertainment running gags or 1 gag featured the whole week. (I think if we only had to pick 1, [[Peanuts]] is the worthiest) [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, the only problem with that one is that its intro would have to be DRASTICALLY expanded. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | :Well, the only problem with that one is that its intro would have to be DRASTICALLY expanded. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 21]] (May 19-25) === | ||
+ | A Food or Drinks Running Gag. How about [[General Tso's Chicken]], [[Fluffy Puff]], [[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]], or [[Homestar Jr.]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
==General discussion== | ==General discussion== |
Revision as of 23:21, 19 March 2008
Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations.
Checklist
Checklist for new Featured Article:
|
Discussion archives
2006, Weeks 1-10 | 2006, Weeks 11-20 | 2006, Weeks 21-30 | 2006, Weeks 31-40 | 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007, Weeks 1-10 | 2007, Weeks 11-20 | 2007, Weeks 21-30 | 2007, Weeks 31-40 | 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008, Weeks 1-10 | 2008, Weeks 11-20Article discussions
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 13 (Mar 24-30)
After looking at the FA history for this year and the nominations, it looks like we haven't yet featured a Strong Bad email. I'd like to suggest comic, the origin of TGS? --Stux 17:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Like I said earlier ijn the year, how about a daily featured article week with Compy 386 emails. Just some classics: comic, japanese cartoon, dragon, crazy cartoon, personal favorites, monument, video games, your friends, invisibility, time capsule, monster truck.
Sam the Man
17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- dragon's already been featured, so it wouldn't include that. Some of those other ones may be significant enough to have a full week also (japanese cartoon, possibly). Heimstern Läufer
17:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- I counted eleven emails in that list, unfortunately the week only has seven! :S. However some of these (like japanese cartoon) have already been featured. Same goes with dragon and... I guess that's it. However, we may have featured more than I know: HRWiki talk:Featured Article Selection#Milestone emails. is a talk section I'm still going by and I think a better week-long selection might be garnered from that list (perhaps not, perhaps a common theme like Compy 386 might be better? not sure.) Anywho, at least with japanese cartoon, HRWiki:Featured article nominations isn't up to date (I remember updating the Milestone emails list) since I'm guessing lately we haven't been using that list for the nominations. So I suspect there may be other emails we have featured that haven't been marked as "featured". --Stux 17:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- I take back what I said. I can't find japanese cartoon in the FA history. Why the heck did I mark it!? --Stux 17:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- If that is the case, I would say japanese cartoon is long overdue as a featured article. wbwolf (t | ed) 05:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, we should just feature japanese cartoon this week. Homestar-Winner (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- If that is the case, I would say japanese cartoon is long overdue as a featured article. wbwolf (t | ed) 05:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- dragon's already been featured, so it wouldn't include that. Some of those other ones may be significant enough to have a full week also (japanese cartoon, possibly). Heimstern Läufer
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 14 (Mar 31-Apr 6)
Does April Fools' 2007 have enough information to be a featured article? Homestar-Winner (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- There was no April Fool's 2007. MHarrington 06:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oops. I mean April Fools' 2006. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- That article doesn't really have enough of a prose intro to be on the main page as it stands, and I'm not sure the topic really lends itself to a lengthier intro (someone may feel free to crush my doubts, though). Heimstern Läufer
06:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- How about one of the other April Fools' gags, such as Under Construction or HomestarRunner.com PAY PLUS!? wbwolf (t | ed) 16:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'd opt for Under Construction as it is older and more plot-driven. - Qermaq - (T/C)
05:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Or maybe we don't even need an April Fools Day FA. We've never had one before. Maybe a Sweet Cuppin Cakes character like Eh! Steve! or even just Sweet Cuppin Cakes. Homestar-Winner (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'd opt for Under Construction as it is older and more plot-driven. - Qermaq - (T/C)
- How about one of the other April Fools' gags, such as Under Construction or HomestarRunner.com PAY PLUS!? wbwolf (t | ed) 16:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- That article doesn't really have enough of a prose intro to be on the main page as it stands, and I'm not sure the topic really lends itself to a lengthier intro (someone may feel free to crush my doubts, though). Heimstern Läufer
- Oops. I mean April Fools' 2006. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 15 (Apr 7-13)
Trog-Cave? Sam the Man
00:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- That article is far too short for featured status. May I suggest Biscuit Dough Hands Man instead? wbwolf (t | ed) 00:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 16 (Apr 14-20)
How 'bout History according to Strong Bad? MHarrington 19:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Already been featured, albeit under a different title. Heimstern Läufer
19:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- DNA Evidence (running gag) week. We feature strong badathlon, unnatural, the movies, your funeral, from work, rough copy, then we top it off with DNA Evidence (toon). If that doesn't work out, we just feature DNA Evidence (running gag). It's a DNA Evidence all you can eat salad bar!
Sam the Man
21:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think I would favor featuring the running gag page, rather than each of the individual emails. I think the toon DNA Evidence is important enough that it deserves more than just a single day to be featured. wbwolf (t | ed) 06:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's a good idea; we could do the running gag one week and the full-blown toon the next. MHarrington 23:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I support featuring the running gag, but don't think we should feature the toon immediately thereafter. That would be a bit overkill. Heimstern Läufer
16:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- I support featuring the running gag, but don't think we should feature the toon immediately thereafter. That would be a bit overkill. Heimstern Läufer
- That's a good idea; we could do the running gag one week and the full-blown toon the next. MHarrington 23:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think I would favor featuring the running gag page, rather than each of the individual emails. I think the toon DNA Evidence is important enough that it deserves more than just a single day to be featured. wbwolf (t | ed) 06:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- DNA Evidence (running gag) week. We feature strong badathlon, unnatural, the movies, your funeral, from work, rough copy, then we top it off with DNA Evidence (toon). If that doesn't work out, we just feature DNA Evidence (running gag). It's a DNA Evidence all you can eat salad bar!
- Here's my idea:
- Monday: strong badathlon
- Tuesday: unnatural
- Wednesday: the movies
- Thursday: your funeral
- Friday: from work
- Saturday: rough copy
- Sunday: DNA Evidence (running gag)
- Just an idea, my pi cents. Sbemailnum314159 01:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's what Sam said above. We agreed to just do the running gag I think. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Here's my idea:
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 17 (Apr 21-27)
Perhaps another pseudocharacter. How about Drive-Thru Whale or Wagon Fulla Pancakes? Sam the Man
19:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it might be too soon for a pseudocharacter. We have Frank Benedetto and possibly Biscuit Dough Hands Man in about a month's span. How about another category of article, such as TV Shows. wbwolf (t | ed) 01:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- To do that one, we'd need to expand its prose intro by at least a few sentences. Anyone want to do that? Heimstern Läufer
06:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- How 'bout Atari 2600? MHarrington 01:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- This one would also definitely need an expansion of the intro first. Heimstern Läufer
01:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Then how 'bout Atari Dragon? MHarrington 01:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I like the idea of featuring Atari 2600. Let me take a stab at trying to expand that intro... wbwolf (t | ed) 06:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Then how 'bout Atari Dragon? MHarrington 01:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- This one would also definitely need an expansion of the intro first. Heimstern Läufer
- How 'bout Atari 2600? MHarrington 01:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- To do that one, we'd need to expand its prose intro by at least a few sentences. Anyone want to do that? Heimstern Läufer
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 18 (Apr 28-May 4)
How about doing a name used commonly in the website, like Dennis, Dan or Douglas? MHarrington 04:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Of the three, I'd say that Dan is the biggest running gag. However, the intro would need to be expanded in order to get on the FA page. The other two, I think are pretty short. (Though Dennis is close...) wbwolf (t | ed) 01:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- But Dennis has the longest intro. MHarrington 15:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I do like Dennis better. Homestar-Winner (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced either of these is really ready to feature right now. For Dan, the problem is that the intro is too short, making it hard to make a substantial write-up. By contrast, the intro of Dennis is fine, but there is scant content outside the intro. Remember, the writeup has that link saying (more...). We need to have something, and not just a little bit, that makes that link worthwhile, and I don't think Dennis is really there yet. Heimstern Läufer
00:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced either of these is really ready to feature right now. For Dan, the problem is that the intro is too short, making it hard to make a substantial write-up. By contrast, the intro of Dennis is fine, but there is scant content outside the intro. Remember, the writeup has that link saying (more...). We need to have something, and not just a little bit, that makes that link worthwhile, and I don't think Dennis is really there yet. Heimstern Läufer
- I do like Dennis better. Homestar-Winner (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- But Dennis has the longest intro. MHarrington 15:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 19 (May 5-11)
Homestar Runner and Marzipan's Relationship? Bad Bad Guy 03:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- That one would need to be expanded a bit. MHarrington 06:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 20 (May 12-18)
Either a week of entertainment running gags or 1 gag featured the whole week. (I think if we only had to pick 1, Peanuts is the worthiest) Bad Bad Guy 22:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the only problem with that one is that its intro would have to be DRASTICALLY expanded. MHarrington 00:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 21 (May 19-25)
A Food or Drinks Running Gag. How about General Tso's Chicken, Fluffy Puff, SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar, or Homestar Jr.? Sam the Man
23:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
General discussion
Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
- [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)