Talk:Fthoom-Bang

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 20:53, 16 May 2007 by The Mu (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Before anyone considers deleting this, there are plenty of things that only appeared once. --Jnelson09 19:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This is too minor. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man
OK. Then I guess we'll have to do away with this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and a lot of other things that have only had 1 or 2 appearances. ¤ The Mü Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The mu, i agree. None of those needs its own page. They would all do fine on the main items page. PS. Er, oops, sorry about that accidental revert.DeFender1031 20:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and also this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and WAY more than that. ¤ The Mü Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The mu, all true. They should all go. DeFender1031 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Alright. Why don't you take it upon yourself to merge all of those into Items, if, that is, you really care? ¤ The Mü Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
If that's the consensus reached on them, then i'd be happy to start on it tomorrow. DeFender1031 20:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
OK then. Also, don't forget, you'll have to do this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. And then you'd be done. ¤ The Mü Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop the childish list-making and actually discuss the merits of this page in a mature way. Thanks. Yes, we have a lot of those pages, but their mere existence isn't necessarily a good reason to keep them. It could just be that our inclusion policy needs looking at as far as those pages go. Or perhaps not. That's what the discussion is for. But don't just throw an avalanche of "this this this" at the thread and expect it to count as a real point. — It's dot com 20:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The Mu is right. There are already too many pages like that and it would take too long to revert them all. Homestar-Winner (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I would be willing to remove them all if necessary. That's not within the scope of this discussion though. DeFender1031 20:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This article has a lot of potential, though. For instance, we could note the patterns in the fireworks. ¤ The Mü Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Fthoom-Bang"