Talk:Main Page

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Days of the week: my thought)
(Load times and potential solutions: some unnecessary calculations)
 
(includes 4164 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Main Page Talk}}
{{Main Page Talk}}
 +
''It has been [[HRWiki talk:Main page redesign|suggested]] that the Main Page be redesigned. Feel free to use [[HRWiki:Main page redesign|its project page]] for proposed redesigns.''
-
__FORCETOC__
+
== sbemail templates ==
 +
:''See [[Talk:Strong Bad Email#sbemail templates|Talk:Strong Bad Email → sbemail templates]]''
-
== H*R Reference In New Book ==
+
== Trogday decor ==
-
I just started reading the latest from one of my favorite authors, Orson Scott Card. It's called ''Empire'', and page 19 begins thusly:
+
-
'''"My head a-''splode''," said one of the wittier students, and everyone laughed again.'''
+
Does the '''Featured content of the day (or whenever)''' template automatically switch to different links on certain days? Such as linking to [[dragon]], [[Trogday '08]] and other things when the time comes? Or is that done manually? Because tomorrow is Trogday. - [[User:HoveringSombrero|HoveringSombrero]] ([[User talk:HoveringSombrero|talk]]) [[File:Shoulder shoomps.png|23px]]
 +
:It's not automatic, but as you can see (at the time of this writing), the decorations were indeed put up to coincide with Trogday. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
-
Can it be agreed upon that this is a bonafied reference? I was wondering if there's a place on this website to record this type of thing. -[[User:TDK|TDK]] 14:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
+
== How many references do you need? ==
-
:It sounds like a direct reference to me. It would go on one of the [[Sightings]] pages, probably [[Other Sightings]], since we don't have a [[Book Sightings]] page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 15:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
+
How many references to a thing need to be on a page for the thing the page is about to become a real page? Just curious because my mock-up seinfeld page includes eight references to the titular show. The page on [[The Big Lebowski]] has the same amount of references... so do I just make a [[Seinfeld]] page now? ----[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 20:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 +
:done and done ----[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 20:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 +
::See our [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion guidelines]]. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
-
::Same here.  I think it's a reference.  {{User:Theyellowdart/sig}}
+
== Songs archive ==
-
:::I don't think TBC ''got'' it from this, but it's definetly a reference. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 03:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Uh, if TBC got it from something, they would be referring to it. We're looking at a sighting here, not a reference. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Definitely a reference. Especially since they all laughed :) --[[User:NevaDie|NevaDie]] 05:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
+
Would it be OK if I created a subpage to my user page with a complete archive of every existing song in the Homestar universe? [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 22:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 +
:I'm pretty sure we [[Songs|have that covered]]. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 +
::Well, I was gonna add MP3 files with them, so people could download them and stuff. Is that still OK? [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 00:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 +
:::No, that's not what the user space is for. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
-
::::::The distinction we are making is that this is not TBC referencing anything, it's something else referencing TBC, which we call a Sighting. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 09:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
+
== dot dot dot ==
-
== Edit Conflicts Noted in Summaries and Posts ==
+
Why come whenever I try to link to [[lady…ing]] and [[Cheat Commandos…O's]], the link is broken? Is it because of those ellipses? {{--}} {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
 +
:Sort of! "…" is different from "...", it's a single character rather than three periods. Try highlighting it and you can see. This is kind of like the difference between “curly quotes” and "straight quotes" - in both cases, the former is typically made via autocorrect in word processors or mobile keyboards, while the latter is preferred by the wiki. So while [[lady…ing]] and [[lady...ing]] may ''look'' the same, they are actually two different typed entries. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 +
::I've added redirects to fix the issue. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 23:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 +
:::Thanks! {{--}} {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
-
Can I just mention how un-useful some edit summaries are? I mean, it's good that you use an edit summary, but we should always try to make them meaningful.
+
== Navigation sidebar - adding @StrongBadActual? ==
-
Specifically, stuff like "Edit Conflict x2" or similar are not good edit summaries. We all get them, big deal. What is the '''nature''' of the edit you finally got on the wiki? A typo fix? A reply? An agreement/disagreement? I'm not intending to point to anyone in particular - I see these often from a lot of people.
+
[[Strong Bad Email]] has been in the sidebar for as long as I can remember, presumably because it was the most popular and most actively updated portion of the website. With the Twitter account handily outpacing both sbemails and "H*R.com updates" (not to mention the [[CGI Paper]] directing viewers to tweet rather than email), might it be worth adding it over there? I know I regularly find myself navigating to the [[@StrongBadActual]] page(s) to fill out "Fast Forward" sections of pages or to find dates when an item or project was mentioned. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 20:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 +
:I agree (and I'm not going to do the whole "Don't you think I agree" part, this isn't [[E-mail Birds]], but it is bird season.), and I fully support putting it there. It's a handy page and we've put a lot of work into cataloging every post made by strong bad on twitter, with fun facts to boot! So consider this my '''SUPPORT'''. ----[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 22:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 +
::I also '''SUPPORT'''. {{--}} {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
 +
:::, So I '''SUPPORT''' this too, but I like having easy access to the Strong Bad Email page, considering I usually watch the sbemails by clicking on the external links. So, maybe we keep both? [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 22:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 +
::::Maybe we link to it as <code><nowiki>[[@StrongBadActual Tweets 2023|Twitter]]</nowiki></code> and put it above [[Strong Bad Email]] and underneath [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent changes]]? {{--}} {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}}
 +
::::: GREAT IDEA! I like it! [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 18:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
-
On a tangental but related topic: what is the purpose of inticating in '''bold letters''' at the start of a Talk post that you were edit conflicted? Is there a meaningful reason to do this that I'm missing? Or is just unnecessary clutter on the page? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
== Editing user pages ==
-
:I think it was doing that automatically._[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 00:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::I think the only time you need to mention being edit conflicted is if your message has changed because of what's mentioned when you got conflicted. Or something. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
:::If, as a result of an edit conflict, my talk post doesn't follow the one immediately preceding it, I usually mark it as an edit conflict so people know that the post was meant to come right after a different post than it actually comes after. Otherwise, it's not really necessary. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::On the other point: Using "edit conflict" as an edit summary is not so useful. It doesn't let one know anything about the nature of your edit. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I concur with both of Heimstern's points. (even if I did the second recently) - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 00:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Wouldn't saying "In response to Heimstern's 00:28 post" (as I am here) be a more clear way to indicate this than mentioning the edit conflict? I mean, in this case, my post is separated from the one I want to reply to since other posts have occurred and there's no convenient way to insert this into the above without disrupting other trains of thought, not due to an edit conflict. Why not take a similar route with edit-conflicted replies, which are essentially subject to that exact same issue? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I've {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:secret_identity&diff=prev&oldid=247637 been saying this}} for {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki_talk:FAQ&diff=prev&oldid=207752 a while now}}. Noting an edit conflict in the actual wiki text should be a last resort. Upon being edit-conflicted, one should ask, does my post still flow with the other posts? Does the fact that I got a conflict need to be pointed out? Is there any way I can rephrase what I wrote to make it fit better? Yes, rephrasing does take a little more time and effort, and occasionally someone beats you to the punch and says what you were going to say. When that happens to me, sometimes I just let the other person's post speak for me. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Qermaq: I don't think it's even necessary to be that verbose. I often just address the person I'm replying to, like here, when I'm replying to the last post a person made. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Fully agreed, in most cases that level of precision would not be needed. But I wanted to illustrate how simple it would be, and how much more meaning it brings to a post than noting that the edit faced a conflict. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
==Virus==
+
-
Hey, what's with the virus pic all over da place? Is it possible that we have a haxor among us?--[[User:Marvelrulez|Marvelrulez]]
+
-
:A template was briefly vandalized to include this image. It's fixed now. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
==Archiving Weeklies?==
+
Alright, so, I've been thinking. The block log has a lot of "user banned for editing userpages of other users". So, the main page, for example, has a system so only sysops can edit it. What if we add a system to all user pages that basically makes it impossible for anybody but the user to edit it? [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 22:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 +
:The thing is, I feel sysops / admins / wiki bots should probably still be able to edit user pages. For example, an admin fixing a bug on the page or a bot auto-replacing a link. But I agree that no one else should edit other user pages. Or somehow make a system where users can choose who can edit the page. {{--}} {{User:HoveringSombrero/sig}} 18:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 +
::We already have [[HRWiki:User space#Ownership and editing of pages in the user space|explicit guidelines]] on who can and should edit user pages.  If a user page is edited for anything other than a legitimate reason, the edit typically gets quickly reverted. No harm done.  Anyone that might be banned in relation to user page edits is most likely doing it in a disruptive manner.  In any case, the block logs mostly include bans for spamming.  There really is no compelling reason to add user page security settings or tools for this.  --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
-
Anyone think it's time to archive the Sketchbook, Fanstuff, and Quote of the Week? meaning, move the 2006 entries to a seperate 2006 archive? I was wondering why it hadn't been done yet. - [[User:Dr. Clash|Dr. Clash]] (how do you people know the exact time you posted to put it after your name, anyway?)
+
== Wiki availability ==
-
:I agree. You put a timestamp after your name by signing with four tildes. These things: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>{{User:Shwoo/sig}} 01:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::I also think that sounds reasonable. Agreeing with what Shwoo said, type three tildes (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) to leave just your signature, and leave four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to leave your signature plus a timestamp. Incidentally, five tildes leaves a timestamp only. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::Done and done. Phew! I'm glad the Quotes don't need archiving, anyway... [[User:Dr. Clash|Dr. Clash]] 03:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::They look great &mdash; good work! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
==Main page image==
+
For about the past week, I haven't been able to access the HRWiki, and downforeveryoneorjustme.com consistently confirmed (and still does) that hrwiki.org is down. However, I see that plenty of edits have been made to the wiki in that time, so obviously it wasn't entirely down. Basically, I've been presented with a white screen that occasionally loaded the hills in the background and sometimes the Homestar logo in the top-left corner, and if I moved the mouse around the screen, it would recognize where links and drop-down menus were, but it wouldn't show me any text for the links and all. Any idea what may have happened/be happening? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
-
Hey I was wondering, why did you change that image on the front page?  It wasn't because I put it there, was it?  I thought the Bubs image was good. {{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 21:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:The Bubs image is a spoiler (it reveals the main joke of the toon). Spoilers should not be on the main page, and so I switched it with a unique image from the toon that doesn't give anything away. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Quit, Appledude!  Oh, dot com, cool.  I see.  As appledude tried to forge, I thought you were mad at me there, but you guys are never mad :P{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 21:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::Yes. In the future, it might be helpful to check the {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:whatsnew&offset=20070206163600&action=history&limit=2 edit summaries}}. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
== "SB emails sent by HRWiki users" ==
+
:Hey Knights.  Usually, when a big update is released, wiki activity jumps exponentially and typically the wiki reaction times can slow down to a crawl. Pages still load but they take forever and one must be patient.  Eventually that goes away as edits taper down.  However, for a site like "downforeveryoneorjustme", their timeout is likely far shorter than regular browsers when reporting if a site is down.  In your particular case it seems that not all website elements are loading and some may be timing out and not loading at all.  I'd typically expect that behavior during peak edit times.  Hope this helps a tiny bit! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 06:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
-
I suggest the making of this page. Not just because I sent one, I was going to suggest the making of this page, either that or a sub-section on the Strong Bad emails page.--{{User:H*bad/sig}} 04:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
+
::At some point I did see pages seemingly load but remain blank unless I interacted with the tab in some way, though that could have been a browser issue, it never really prevented me from accessing the wiki, and I haven't been experiencing it for a while. I've also had some "unable to connect" errors because sometimes when loading the wiki, it attempts to load an https URL. Most of the time, though, especially after a new release, it's been just slowdowns. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-
:We're here to document the work of TBC, not blow our own horns. I am absolutely opposed to this - on principle, mind you; even if a long-time admin had suggested it, my response would be the same. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Either way, there is [[HRWiki:Emails from HRWiki Users|this]] article {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 04:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::Gah... why didn't I see that?--{{User:H*bad/sig}} 04:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
== HRwiki.com Deutschland edition ==
+
=== Still Slow ===
 +
It seems that the wiki hasn't fully recovered from its slowdowns back in August.  In the last couple of months I've come across the Job Queue and [[MW:Manual:Job queue|this mediawiki page]] detailing what it is and how it's supposed to function.  I get the impression that currently, all jobs on the wiki are running when a page is being requested.  The page outlines a means by which the jobs can be run in the background (either via cron job or background process; I'd recommend the background process) and then the job run rate could be set to zero (so that pages aren't spending time running jobs while loading).  Is this something that is already in place or could this perhaps be implemented in order to improve overall performance even during busy periods? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 11:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
-
I probably missed something here but why is it that [http://www.hrwiki.com] takes me to some german Enzyklopädie?  I thought we had all 3 .com/.net/.org domains?  Was it hijacked? Has it always been this way?  I dont remember it being this way. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
+
==glitch on the main pages ==
-
:Naw, we never had .com.[http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://hrwiki.com] And we registered .net back in 2005.[[HRWiki:Ledger|[3]]] &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::We registered hrwiki.org on [http://whois.domaintools.com/hrwiki.org 03 April 2004] and hrwiki.com was registered by the German Human Resources people on [http://whois.domaintools.com/hrwiki.com 23 April 2004].  We additionally registered hrwiki.net on [http://whois.domaintools.com/hrwiki.net 03 August 2005].&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 03:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
+
Noticed a glitch on the main pages, done by holding the cursor on one of the buttons, and then moving away, and then moving your finger off the mouse. to see what this does and what I mean, refer to this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgM-NA0Rja4 [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 21:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 +
:There's a whole page about this. [[Main Page Glitches]] {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 21:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
-
:::Ah! Must've been my imagination.  I wonder if they get much traffic meant for this site. Thanks guys! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 11:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
+
== Why does the website still have the Halloween theme? ==
 +
Halloween ended 18 days ago, and so did October in general, so why does the website still have the Hallow's Eve theme? --{{User:Cy4nIsN0tB1u3/sig}} 04:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 +
:Because we're still waiting for the annual Fan Costumes toon to close out the season, even if we have to wait [[Decomposing Pumpkins|days after Thanksgiving]]. Also, because the sysops in charge of changing the wiki settings are busy people with lives and tend to wait a while to get around to it. -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131|68.37.43.131]] 23:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
-
== Memo to HRWiki power users et al. ==
+
==New Fan Stumes’!==
-
Hey guys. I've noticed that not a whole lot of people are aware of this, so I'm letting you know that I created a template called {{[[Template:newsbemail|newsbemail]]}} that gives us a really big head start on the first edit of a new sbemail article. For example, when starting the article for [[unnatural]], all you need to type is <code><nowiki>{{subst:newsbemail|166}}</nowiki></code>. So check it out, try it out in the [[HRWiki:Sandbox|sandbox]], and improve it if you can. We'll probably make a <nowiki>{{newtoon}}</nowiki> template once people get the hang of it. Thanks, and happy editing! &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 15:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
+
The 2023 Fan Stumes has been released! And not only that, but my costume from last year is the very first Strong Bad costume! That counts as a fun fact, right? We should probably note that like how we note when a wikian sent a email. [[User:TMBGLOVER|I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too!]] 17:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
-
== Capital Sbemail titles? ==
+
== Permafrosted logo? ==
-
With the release of this new [[New Stuff]] feature on the Toons menu, I wonder, are the sbemails meant to be capitalized? [[:Image:NewToonsMenu.PNG|This image]] clearly spells [[unnatural]], [[strong badathlon]], and [[looking old]] capitalized. Is this the way they should be spelled, or is this something to ignore? {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 02:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
+
The Decemberween themed logo is still up, but December ended 11 days ago. The weirdest part in my opinion is that there's no d'ween themed colors despide icicles and Homestar's hat. Is there something we're waiting for, like a new not-Decemberween toon?
-
:I believe the last time we talked about this was on [[Talk:Strong Bad Email#No caps]]. Opinions are heavily divided: I still see lowercase Lappy menu e-mail titles as non-binding aesthetics; some would rather keep article case based on how the first official released title looks. Maybe we should move this thread to [[Talk:Strong Bad Email]] if you wish to talk about it further. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 02:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
+
Yours truly,
-
::One way or the other, we're gonna have to have piped links somewhere. Since the Strong Bad Email menu can and does have some capital letters, I maintain that we should continue using it as our official capitalization. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
+
The guy who confused Dobbs for Daubs. {{unsigned|206.110.189.60|11 January 2024 16:34 (UTC)}}  
-
:::I much prefer them lowercase. I can't explain why, except that I feel it looks god-awful in uppercase. That's just my opinion, though. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
:::Dorian, I have to simply state that regardless of your feelings on what the aesthetics are, whatever is presented in the sbemail menu should be considered canon. They can feel free to also present them in other styles elsewhere, but as we are documenting the sbemails, we should use those titles. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 05:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Absolutely. I'm sure redirects wouldn't be that big of a deal however, if that's an option. &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 22:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:''Note: Any further discussion on this topic should take place in  [[Talk:Strong_Bad_Email#Capitalizing_titles|Talk:Strong Bad Email#Capitalizing titles]].''
+
-
== Toons Menu ==
+
:I'm not an admin, but I'm assuming the style is simply for the winter season. Even though the Christmas lights have been taken down, it's still a chilly and snowy time of year for {{w|March equinox|at least another month and a half}}. (P.S. Even if you don't have an account, please sign your posts with four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 17:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
-
There's a new thing called "New Stuff" on the Toons Menu. --[[User:205.206.196.178|205.206.196.178]] 04:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:Yes, see [[New Stuff]] and [[H*R.com updates 2007#Monday, February 12, 2007]] for details.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 04:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
+
== Load times and potential solutions ==
-
== Update ==
+
The wiki's been crawling along like something funny that crawls along for about a year now. This hasn't been much more than a minor inconvenience on my end, but it comes up pretty frequently on [https://www.reddit.com/r/HomestarRunner/ the Homestar subreddit], with a concerning number saying they haven't been able to access it at all. [https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/hrwiki.org downforeveryoneorjustme.com] consistently insists that the system is down. I don't know what the hosting situation is like, nor am I anything close to an expert on such things, so unfortunately I can't diagnose the issue... But, [[DNA Evidence|after <s>extensive</s> investigation]], I'm ready to release my findings.
-
*New Quote of the week, weekly fanstuff, and sketchbook. --[[User:205.206.196.178|205.206.196.178]] 15:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
+
*[[Talk:Main Page#Still Slow]] {{--}} A few months ago, [[User:Stux|Stux]] proposed a solution involving MediaWiki's [[mw:Manual:Job queue|job queue]]. Seems like something worth looking into.
-
 
+
*[https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/host-a-website-with-high-availability/ Host a Website with High Availability] {{--}} The wiki's web host Linode features a guide on how to host a website with high availability. I can understand at most seven words of this, and I'm not sure how well it applies to wikis, but it might be helpful to someone. (They also have guides for [https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/security/ssl/ enabling HTTPS], which improves security... Maybe performance too, but I've heard mixed things about that.)
-
== RSS Feeds? ==
+
*[[Special:Version]] {{--}} The wiki is currently powered by MediaWiki 1.15, which released in 2011. Later versions have added collapsible elements, citation features, slideshow galleries, an optional visual editor interface, the ability to rename categories, and most relevant to this particular discussion, [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader improved performance]. The current stable release is 1.41.
-
 
+
*[[HRWiki:Donations]] {{--}} I just discovered that [[HRWiki:2011 Server Move|the wiki moved servers in 2011]] to cut back on expenses, which [[HRWiki talk:2011 Server Move#Slowness|apparently resulted in slower load times]] (at least initially, while settings were still being optimized). According to [[Special:Ledger]], there haven't been any donations since then (additionally, it still lists FellowSites hosting dues instead of the new host). I've seen multiple people offering to donate if they could, so if the more recent slowness is once again a financial issue, it might help to [https://www.paypal.com/us/cshelp/article/ts2067 get the donation links working again].
-
Could an RSS Feed be made of the Recent Updates section - or is that not possible? [[User:86.132.122.135|86.132.122.135]] 12:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
+
*{{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&group=developer Special:ListUsers&group=developer}} {{--}} I have no way of knowing how actively people have been working on maintaining backend stuff, but I can see that of the six developers, only [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] and [[User:Tom|Tom]] have been editing consistently since 2016. I realize I'm asking quite a lot of two people at most, and I really don't want to be too demanding... so I can't help but wonder if my suggestions might seem more reasonable if there were more people responsible for backend maintenance. I'm not qualified for that sort of thing, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were active users with MediaWiki and/or web development experience. As much as I want this wiki to be accessible to more people, I really don't want anyone losing sleep over it.
-
 
+
Anyway, sorry I can't offer more help than this, but I hope someone finds this stuff useful (and that I didn't get anything terribly wrong)! {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 01:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
-
:If you mean an RSS feed of [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]], that's [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&feed=atom already available]. If you're talking about an RSS feed of the H*R.com site updates, that's also [http://www.interglacial.com/rss/homestar.rss available]. &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 14:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
+
:Out of curiosity, I decided to use [[Special:Statistics]] and the WayBack Machine to calculate roughly how many people have been affected by the slow load times. After comparing the last seven months (from around the start of the slowdowns to now) to the seven months prior, I found that the average number of edits per day has decreased from 22 to 14, and the average number of active users has dropped from 27 to 17. That's a 37% decrease in ''both'' areas, leading me to believe they are linked by a common cause...
-
 
+
:Unfortunately I couldn't figure out if that percentage corresponded to anything specific, like "37% of people use this certain type of Internet connection"... That information would tell me which people are having problems accessing the wiki, and from there I might be able to research a potential solution, assuming any of that works the way I think it does. Maybe I'll do an off-site poll somewhere, but I'd need to know what information would be most pertinent to ask... Would that be helpful at all? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 05:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
-
== made new page ==
+
-
 
+
-
Hi guys! Me, hrfreak again! If you want to see my new page, just type in, Homestarrunner Bio, or just click on the hilighted word entitled, "Homestarrunner Bio". Enjoy it! although, I might be workin' on it later! see ya! Hrfreak
+
-
:Hey there, hrfreak. Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but we already have that information on the page about [[Homestar Runner]]. Cheers. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Signatures ==
+
-
Hi, I'm new to HR Wiki. I am dying to know how you guys get icons in your signatures.  Can anyone do it, or just admin-type guys? --[[User:NevaDie|NevaDie]] 05:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Anyone can do it &mdash; there are instructions at [[Help:Signature]]. If you have any questions, feel free to [[User talk:Trey56|ask on my talk page]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== More <s>butter</s> info, please! ==
+
-
 
+
-
Uh, what exactly is homestar runner wiki?  (Obviously, I'm a Star Wars geek)
+
-
[[User:Darth Plagueis The Wise|'''<span style="color:black">Darth Plagueis The Wise'''</span>]] [[User talk:Darth Plagueis The Wise|<span style="color:red"><small>Know the power of the Dark Side</small></span>]]
+
-
:Take a look at [[HRWiki:About|this page]]. That has just about everything (I think). Happy wiki-ing! - {{User:The Joe/sig}} 01:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== HRWiki OS-tan revealed to the world! ==
+
-
[[Image:HRWiki-tan.jpeg|thumb|HRWiki-tan]]
+
-
As per [[User talk:4kai2lyn6#OS-tan HRWiki|kai lyn's talk page]], I have created a cute little drawing of an [[Wikipedia:OS-tan|OS-tan]] representing HRWiki! This is just for fun to see what people think of it, but I thought if Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan|got to have one]], we should too! The full explanation of her appearance is on the [[User talk:4kai2lyn6#OS-tan HRWiki|afformentioned talk page]], but for those of you who are too lazy to go there, I'll explain it now (pardon the copy/paste job).
+
-
<blockquote>Okay here, let me explain. First, on the right arm I accidentally used a marker that was too thick before I realized that I had a smaller one to use. My mistake. :-( The logo on her bottom braid is, very small, H*R and the stars were for just what Kai lyn said, HomeSTAR Runner. Three Homestar faces are on her outfit, the loop braid and the boots; the body of the boots represents Strong Bad and she's wearing a Homestar shirt. Her hair and ribbons are the main colors of the HRWiki site, blue and white. The skirt represents bees, which the HRWiki users act a lot like (working together for a common goal, honey or info about H*R, and delivering a quick sting to trolls). I just did whatever for her arms. The utility belt has a badge that says "IP", for her to use when she's not logged in, an easter egg, and a book of references. She also holds a notebook with all of HRWiki's articles in it. The hairstyle doesn't really apply to anything, I just made it up and have used it on three characters now. Oh yes, and please pardon the fact that I can't draw hands.</blockquote>
+
-
-{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 22:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Days of the week ==
+
-
 
+
-
I just had an idea: What if we reveal the days of the week along with the release dates? I mean, it might just serve some kind of purpose. --[[User:Jnelson09|Jnelson09]] 23:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:What, you mean like [[H*R.com updates 2007|this]]? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::You probably mean on [[Template:whatsnew]], right? Well, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=421638 here]'s what it would look like. I don't think it looks too bad... &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 23:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::I honestly don't see the point. If you want to know the day of the week, you can use a calender. How would it come in handy? - {{User:The Joe/sig}} 23:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+

Current revision as of 05:18, 18 April 2024

Main Page Talk
Archive

1 (1-20)
2 (21-40)
3 (41-60)
4 (61-80)
5 (81-100)
6 (101-120)
7 (121-140)
8 (141-160)
9 (161-180)
10 (181-200)
11 (201-220)
12 (221-240)
13 (241-260)
14 (261-280)
15 (281-300)
16 (301-320)
17 (321-340)
18 (341-360)
19 (361-380)
20 (381-400)
21 (401-420)
22 (421-440)
23 (441-460)
24 (461-480)

25 (481-500)
26 (501-520)
27 (521-540)
28 (541-560)
29 (561-580)
30 (581-600)
31 (601-620)
32 (621-640)
33 (641-660)
34 (661-680)
35 (681-700)
36 (701-720)
37 (721-740)
38 (741-760)
39 (761-780)
40 (781-800)
41 (801-820)
42 (821-840)
43 (841-860)
44 (861-880)
45 (881-900)
46 (901-920)
47 (921-940)
48 (941-960)


It has been suggested that the Main Page be redesigned. Feel free to use its project page for proposed redesigns.

Contents

[edit] sbemail templates

See Talk:Strong Bad Email → sbemail templates

[edit] Trogday decor

Does the Featured content of the day (or whenever) template automatically switch to different links on certain days? Such as linking to dragon, Trogday '08 and other things when the time comes? Or is that done manually? Because tomorrow is Trogday. - HoveringSombrero (talk)

It's not automatic, but as you can see (at the time of this writing), the decorations were indeed put up to coincide with Trogday. — It's dot com 01:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

[edit] How many references do you need?

How many references to a thing need to be on a page for the thing the page is about to become a real page? Just curious because my mock-up seinfeld page includes eight references to the titular show. The page on The Big Lebowski has the same amount of references... so do I just make a Seinfeld page now? ----J∃ffJMan 20:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

done and done ----J∃ffJMan 20:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
See our inclusion guidelines. — It's dot com 21:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Songs archive

Would it be OK if I created a subpage to my user page with a complete archive of every existing song in the Homestar universe? I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 22:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure we have that covered. — It's dot com 23:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Well, I was gonna add MP3 files with them, so people could download them and stuff. Is that still OK? I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 00:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
No, that's not what the user space is for. — It's dot com 00:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

[edit] dot dot dot

Why come whenever I try to link to lady…ing and Cheat Commandos…O's, the link is broken? Is it because of those ellipses? — HoveringSombrero (talk)

Sort of! "…" is different from "...", it's a single character rather than three periods. Try highlighting it and you can see. This is kind of like the difference between “curly quotes” and "straight quotes" - in both cases, the former is typically made via autocorrect in word processors or mobile keyboards, while the latter is preferred by the wiki. So while lady…ing and lady...ing may look the same, they are actually two different typed entries. -- Bleu Ninja 22:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
I've added redirects to fix the issue. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 23:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! — HoveringSombrero (talk)

[edit] Navigation sidebar - adding @StrongBadActual?

Strong Bad Email has been in the sidebar for as long as I can remember, presumably because it was the most popular and most actively updated portion of the website. With the Twitter account handily outpacing both sbemails and "H*R.com updates" (not to mention the CGI Paper directing viewers to tweet rather than email), might it be worth adding it over there? I know I regularly find myself navigating to the @StrongBadActual page(s) to fill out "Fast Forward" sections of pages or to find dates when an item or project was mentioned. -- Bleu Ninja 20:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

I agree (and I'm not going to do the whole "Don't you think I agree" part, this isn't E-mail Birds, but it is bird season.), and I fully support putting it there. It's a handy page and we've put a lot of work into cataloging every post made by strong bad on twitter, with fun facts to boot! So consider this my SUPPORT. ----J∃ffJMan 22:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
I also SUPPORT. — HoveringSombrero (talk)
, So I SUPPORT this too, but I like having easy access to the Strong Bad Email page, considering I usually watch the sbemails by clicking on the external links. So, maybe we keep both? I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 22:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Maybe we link to it as [[@StrongBadActual Tweets 2023|Twitter]] and put it above Strong Bad Email and underneath Recent changes? — HoveringSombrero (talk)
GREAT IDEA! I like it! I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 18:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Editing user pages

Alright, so, I've been thinking. The block log has a lot of "user banned for editing userpages of other users". So, the main page, for example, has a system so only sysops can edit it. What if we add a system to all user pages that basically makes it impossible for anybody but the user to edit it? I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 22:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

The thing is, I feel sysops / admins / wiki bots should probably still be able to edit user pages. For example, an admin fixing a bug on the page or a bot auto-replacing a link. But I agree that no one else should edit other user pages. Or somehow make a system where users can choose who can edit the page. — HoveringSombrero (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
We already have explicit guidelines on who can and should edit user pages. If a user page is edited for anything other than a legitimate reason, the edit typically gets quickly reverted. No harm done. Anyone that might be banned in relation to user page edits is most likely doing it in a disruptive manner. In any case, the block logs mostly include bans for spamming. There really is no compelling reason to add user page security settings or tools for this. --Stux 21:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki availability

For about the past week, I haven't been able to access the HRWiki, and downforeveryoneorjustme.com consistently confirmed (and still does) that hrwiki.org is down. However, I see that plenty of edits have been made to the wiki in that time, so obviously it wasn't entirely down. Basically, I've been presented with a white screen that occasionally loaded the hills in the background and sometimes the Homestar logo in the top-left corner, and if I moved the mouse around the screen, it would recognize where links and drop-down menus were, but it wouldn't show me any text for the links and all. Any idea what may have happened/be happening? The Knights Who Say Ni 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hey Knights. Usually, when a big update is released, wiki activity jumps exponentially and typically the wiki reaction times can slow down to a crawl. Pages still load but they take forever and one must be patient. Eventually that goes away as edits taper down. However, for a site like "downforeveryoneorjustme", their timeout is likely far shorter than regular browsers when reporting if a site is down. In your particular case it seems that not all website elements are loading and some may be timing out and not loading at all. I'd typically expect that behavior during peak edit times. Hope this helps a tiny bit! --Stux 06:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
At some point I did see pages seemingly load but remain blank unless I interacted with the tab in some way, though that could have been a browser issue, it never really prevented me from accessing the wiki, and I haven't been experiencing it for a while. I've also had some "unable to connect" errors because sometimes when loading the wiki, it attempts to load an https URL. Most of the time, though, especially after a new release, it's been just slowdowns. DEI DAT VMdatvm center\super contra 21:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Still Slow

It seems that the wiki hasn't fully recovered from its slowdowns back in August. In the last couple of months I've come across the Job Queue and this mediawiki page detailing what it is and how it's supposed to function. I get the impression that currently, all jobs on the wiki are running when a page is being requested. The page outlines a means by which the jobs can be run in the background (either via cron job or background process; I'd recommend the background process) and then the job run rate could be set to zero (so that pages aren't spending time running jobs while loading). Is this something that is already in place or could this perhaps be implemented in order to improve overall performance even during busy periods? --Stux 11:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

[edit] glitch on the main pages

Noticed a glitch on the main pages, done by holding the cursor on one of the buttons, and then moving away, and then moving your finger off the mouse. to see what this does and what I mean, refer to this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgM-NA0Rja4 I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 21:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

There's a whole page about this. Main Page Glitches Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 21:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Why does the website still have the Halloween theme?

Halloween ended 18 days ago, and so did October in general, so why does the website still have the Hallow's Eve theme? --Cy4nIsN0tB1u3 04:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Because we're still waiting for the annual Fan Costumes toon to close out the season, even if we have to wait days after Thanksgiving. Also, because the sysops in charge of changing the wiki settings are busy people with lives and tend to wait a while to get around to it. -- 68.37.43.131 23:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

[edit] New Fan Stumes’!

The 2023 Fan Stumes has been released! And not only that, but my costume from last year is the very first Strong Bad costume! That counts as a fun fact, right? We should probably note that like how we note when a wikian sent a email. I wanna be the TMBGLOVER too! 17:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

[edit] Permafrosted logo?

The Decemberween themed logo is still up, but December ended 11 days ago. The weirdest part in my opinion is that there's no d'ween themed colors despide icicles and Homestar's hat. Is there something we're waiting for, like a new not-Decemberween toon? Yours truly, The guy who confused Dobbs for Daubs. — 206.110.189.60 (Talk | contribs) 11 January 2024 16:34 (UTC) (left unsigned)

I'm not an admin, but I'm assuming the style is simply for the winter season. Even though the Christmas lights have been taken down, it's still a chilly and snowy time of year for at least another month and a half. (P.S. Even if you don't have an account, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~) -- Bleu Ninja 17:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

[edit] Load times and potential solutions

The wiki's been crawling along like something funny that crawls along for about a year now. This hasn't been much more than a minor inconvenience on my end, but it comes up pretty frequently on the Homestar subreddit, with a concerning number saying they haven't been able to access it at all. downforeveryoneorjustme.com consistently insists that the system is down. I don't know what the hosting situation is like, nor am I anything close to an expert on such things, so unfortunately I can't diagnose the issue... But, after extensive investigation, I'm ready to release my findings.

  • Talk:Main Page#Still Slow — A few months ago, Stux proposed a solution involving MediaWiki's job queue. Seems like something worth looking into.
  • Host a Website with High Availability — The wiki's web host Linode features a guide on how to host a website with high availability. I can understand at most seven words of this, and I'm not sure how well it applies to wikis, but it might be helpful to someone. (They also have guides for enabling HTTPS, which improves security... Maybe performance too, but I've heard mixed things about that.)
  • Special:Version — The wiki is currently powered by MediaWiki 1.15, which released in 2011. Later versions have added collapsible elements, citation features, slideshow galleries, an optional visual editor interface, the ability to rename categories, and most relevant to this particular discussion, improved performance. The current stable release is 1.41.
  • HRWiki:Donations — I just discovered that the wiki moved servers in 2011 to cut back on expenses, which apparently resulted in slower load times (at least initially, while settings were still being optimized). According to Special:Ledger, there haven't been any donations since then (additionally, it still lists FellowSites hosting dues instead of the new host). I've seen multiple people offering to donate if they could, so if the more recent slowness is once again a financial issue, it might help to get the donation links working again.
  • Special:ListUsers&group=developer — I have no way of knowing how actively people have been working on maintaining backend stuff, but I can see that of the six developers, only It's dot com and Tom have been editing consistently since 2016. I realize I'm asking quite a lot of two people at most, and I really don't want to be too demanding... so I can't help but wonder if my suggestions might seem more reasonable if there were more people responsible for backend maintenance. I'm not qualified for that sort of thing, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were active users with MediaWiki and/or web development experience. As much as I want this wiki to be accessible to more people, I really don't want anyone losing sleep over it.

Anyway, sorry I can't offer more help than this, but I hope someone finds this stuff useful (and that I didn't get anything terribly wrong)! Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 01:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, I decided to use Special:Statistics and the WayBack Machine to calculate roughly how many people have been affected by the slow load times. After comparing the last seven months (from around the start of the slowdowns to now) to the seven months prior, I found that the average number of edits per day has decreased from 22 to 14, and the average number of active users has dropped from 27 to 17. That's a 37% decrease in both areas, leading me to believe they are linked by a common cause...
Unfortunately I couldn't figure out if that percentage corresponded to anything specific, like "37% of people use this certain type of Internet connection"... That information would tell me which people are having problems accessing the wiki, and from there I might be able to research a potential solution, assuming any of that works the way I think it does. Maybe I'll do an off-site poll somewhere, but I'd need to know what information would be most pertinent to ask... Would that be helpful at all? Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 05:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal tools